similar to: rsync --server command line options

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 12000 matches similar to: "rsync --server command line options"

2017 Mar 03
2
How do you exclude a directory that is a symlink?
Considering you cant INCLUDE a directory that is a symlink... which would be really handy right now for me to resolve a mapping of 103 -> meaningful_name for backups, instead im resorting to temporary bind mounts of 103 onto meaningful_name, and when the bind mount isnt there, the --del is emptying meaningful_name accidentally at times. I think both situations could benefit from a
2018 Oct 09
0
rsync --server command line options
. is the 'current directory' notation in unix. .. is the parent directory. /kc On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 01:57:09PM -0700, Parke via rsync said: >Hello, > >I ran the following commands: > >rsync /tmp/foo remote: >rsync remote:/tmp/foo . > >On the remote computer, the following commands were executed: > >rsync --server -e.LsfxC . .
2015 Apr 06
3
rsync --link-dest won't link even if existing file is out of date
This has been a consideration. But it pains me that a tiny change/addition to the rsync option set would save much time and space for other legit use cases. We know rsync very well, we dont know ZFS very well (licensing kept the tech out of our linux-centric operations). We've been using it but we're not experts yet. Thanks for the suggestion. /kc On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:07:05PM
2015 Jul 02
1
cut-off time for rsync ?
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:05:50PM +0100, Simon Hobson said: >As I read this, the default is to look at the file size/timestamp and if they match then do nothing as they are assumed to be identical. So unless you have specified this, then files which have already been copied should be ignored - the check should be quite low in CPU, at least compared to the "cost" of
2015 Jul 14
1
rsync --link-dest and --files-from lead by a "change list" from some file system audit tool (Was: Re: cut-off time for rsync ?)
And what's performance like? I've heard lots of COW systems performance drops through the floor when there's many snapshots. /kc On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:59:25AM +0200, Paul Slootman said: >On Mon 13 Jul 2015, Andrew Gideon wrote: >> >> On the other hand, I do confess that I am sometimes miffed at the waste >> involved in a small change to a very
2018 Dec 31
2
--partial does not "unhide" the files
Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (So 30 Dez 2018 23:56:44 CET): > I think --partial might be a red herring here. It only applies to what > happens when rsync is aborted in the middle of a file. What happens > without -P? Same happens w/o --partial. I append 2 logs: - a from localhost to remote server, exposing the missing "rename" - b from localhost to
2015 Apr 06
6
rsync --link-dest won't link even if existing file is out of date
Feature request: allow --link-dest dir to be linked to even if file exists in target. This statement from the man page is adhered to too strongly IMHO: "This option works best when copying into an empty destination hierarchy, as rsync treats existing files as definitive (so it never looks in the link-dest dirs when a destination file already exists)". I was suprised by this behaviour
2018 Dec 30
2
--partial does not "unhide" the files
Hi, I used --partial to transfer files from my local computer (rsync 3.1.2, Debian) to a remote computer (rsync 3.1.1 WD MyPassport Storage device) The files get transferred, but after successful transfer, the files are not renamed from .<tmpfile> to <file>. Where to go next? Here is the verbose output after transferring an empty file heiko at blade:~/Pictures$ rsync
2018 Dec 31
0
--partial does not "unhide" the files
I can't say I have any idea why rsync would just skip that step and I can't duplicate it myself. Your only recourse might be to use --inplace on that system. On 12/31/18 12:33 PM, Heiko Schlittermann via rsync wrote: > Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (So 30 Dez 2018 23:56:44 CET): >> I think --partial might be a red herring here. It only applies to what
2017 Nov 26
3
Solution for rsync overall progress data display
Hello, I looking for a solution to display overall rsync progress on an LCD display as a bargraph. I have found 2 parameters: --progress This option tells rsync to print information showing the progress of the transfer. This gives a bored user something to watch. Implies --verbose if it wasn't already specified.
2004 Jul 21
2
nonparametetric bivariate regression
Hi there, Does R has built-in codes for nonpara. bivariate regression so that I can estimate the joint distribution of two variables as a function of some covariates? Thanks a lot. --------------------------------------------------- Ximing Wu Department of Economics University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1 Tel: (519) 842-4120, ext 53014 Fax: (519) 763-8497 email: xiwu at
2003 Jan 06
3
Printer Driver Download Problem - PPD's Not DL'ing
Hey All, just a quick question about printer upload/download stuff that's been confusing the hell out of me for a couple days... This might be a Samba, or a CUPS problem, so i've posted this on both newsgroups, but if anyone's had a similar problem I'd really appreciate any help! I'm running Samba 2.2.7 and CUPS 1.1.17 on a RedHat 7.3 System.. I'm trying to get the
2024 Feb 05
1
Graceful shutdown doesn't stop all Gluster processes
Hello Everyone, I am using GlusterFS 9.4, and whenever we use the systemctl command to stop the Gluster server, it leaves many Gluster processes running. So, I just want to check how to shut down the Gluster server in a graceful manner. Is there any specific sequence or trick I need to follow? Currently, I am using the following command: [root at master2 ~]# systemctl stop glusterd.service
2015 Sep 09
2
large rsync fails with assertion error
rsyncing a tree of perhaps 30M files, getting this: rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. then a bit more output and
2010 Jul 20
1
metaplot (rmeta)
Greetings I have been trying to use metaplot to create a forest plot of my meta-analysis results. My data is in the form of ORs, so I've been inputting the ORs as the point estimate (mn) and the SEs of the logORs as the SE (se). However, whilst the point estimates appear to be displayed properly, many of the confidence intervals go below zero (not possible for an OR, as far as I know). I
2013 Feb 22
1
Netcdf file in R
Good afternoon, I am a new in R. I have to work with large climate data.I am not able to read the netcdf file. Can anyone try with this file attached ? Best Regards, ..................Anup KhanalNorwegian Institute of science and Technology (NTNU)Trondheim, NorwayMob:(+47) 45174313
2012 Jul 05
5
Netbios over VPN
I am attempting to utilize BackupPC on a Fedora 14 server to backup a remote client. As I understand, it's primary mechanism for finding clients is performing a nmblookup <clientname> This works fine for computers connected to the local network. My issue is extending ?Samba's? search to encompass our other network - the point-to-point VPNs Using OpenVPN, we have a number of road
2012 Aug 07
2
What is this called? lapply(datum,"[[","ColumnName")
Hello R users I recently learned how to use this command: lapply(datum,"[[","ColumnName") Unfortunately, I don't know how exactly it works, what it's called (in particular the "[[" part], and what other things you can do with it (retrieve multiple columns?). Given datum is a list of dataframes with the same column, but different number of rows,
2015 Apr 16
2
rsync --delete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand what is wrong with rm either. But if you must have an empty directory is there a tmpfs where you can make one? Is there already an empty one like /var/empty? On 04/16/2015 10:13 AM, Ken Chase wrote: > Wow, it took me a few seconds to figure out what you were trying to > do. > > What's wrong with rm? >
2015 Jul 17
3
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099 --- Comment #8 from Chip Schweiss <chip at innovates.com> --- I would argue that optionally all directory scanning should be made parallel. Modern file systems perform best when request queues are kept full. The current mode of rsync scanning directories does nothing to take advantage of this. I currently use scripts to split a couple