similar to: bug: xattr filter rule treated as file filter rule on the remote side

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "bug: xattr filter rule treated as file filter rule on the remote side"

2018 Jun 10
1
[Bug 13467] New: an xattr filter rule is treated as a file filter rule on the remote side
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13467 Bug ID: 13467 Summary: an xattr filter rule is treated as a file filter rule on the remote side Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core
2005 Apr 26
1
Bug#306368: filter rules are too modern for remote rsync (which is 2.5.6)
I received the following bug report for the Debian rsync package today. I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in this way... Perhaps Wayne could comment? Paul Slootman On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > Rsync fails to push filters to the the remote host if the remote rsync > is older than the Debian's. I've tried to connect to a
2011 Sep 13
1
protect rule prevents file sending when in merge filter file?
Hi, We upgraded from rsync 2.6.8 to 3.0.6, and ran into a problem with P (protect) rules coming in from filter files. The rule works if given on command line, but if given via . (merge), it no longer works. The effect is that files are not sent to the destination any more. I verified the problem still exists in 3.0.9pre2. I don't think this is bug 8309
2007 Jul 20
0
[ycui1@bloomberg.com: Re: rsync bug?? (rsync fails when -C is used).]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:24:10PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > The remote rsync is running out of memory as it collects the CVS > ignore rules (add_rule). Something could be awry with the CVS ignore > rules, or the machine could just be low on memory. Please run rsync > again with -vvv (three verbose options), which will make the remote > rsync show (among other useful
2016 Feb 29
0
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
Nice repro. It looks well-defined to me too. Is there a PR open yet? > On 2016-Feb-29, at 08:21, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> Just as a reality check, I wrote up a demonstration where one link >> order causes a SIGFPE and another
2011 Oct 28
3
Strange bug (buffer overflow) happening only under cron
Hi, I am running OS X Snow Leopard on the 'sender' side and Linux (2.6.32, possibly fedora but unsure) on the 'receiver' side. Both with rsync 3.0.9. If I run the following command from the command line: /usr/local/bin/rsync -av -e "ssh -i \ /Users/pedrofortunyayuso/.ssh/backup_pfortuny_net" \ --filter ': rsync.dirs' ~/ pfortuny at
2010 Feb 05
1
Error 11: can not backup /var/lib/zope2.9
Moin, I wrote a small backup script that use rsync: r5backup (http://sourceforge.net/projects/r5backup/). It backup dozen of unix machines for many people. But when I try to backup /var/lib/zope2.9 I get an error 11. It does not matter if zope is running or not. I can't see an error meassge in the (verbose) logfile: [client] parse_filter_file(/etc/r5backup/profiles/boulder.exclude,0,3)
2009 Aug 18
2
rsync 3.0.4 under cygwin: problems with --exclude
Hi all, I'm trying to backup a disk using rsync but I need to exclude some folder. I'm using rsync 3.0.4 under cygwin on a winxp machine. The script that I use is: # ---------------------------------------------------------------- # SRCDIR=/cygdrive/d LOGDIR=/cygdrive/f BCKDIR=/cygdrive/f/Backup rsync -auv --progress --delete --delete-excluded --log-file=$LOGDIR/`date +%Y%m%d`.log
2016 Feb 29
3
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Just as a reality check, I wrote up a demonstration where one link > order causes a SIGFPE and another doesn't (and the program is well > defined, as far as I can tell). All TUs are compiled with -O3. This is also > an instance where we don't actually speculate an inline function,
2007 Jul 19
2
rsync bug?? (rsync fails when -C is used).
hi, All. I just compiled the latest rsync (2.6.9). but I'm getting an error when I use the -C option. eg: $ rsync -aCv host1:/home/john/data/ /home/john/data receiving file list ... ERROR: out of memory in add_rule [sender] rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(115) [sender=2.6.9] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes received so far) [receiver]
2023 Feb 22
1
Auth-worker, unknown scheme ARGON2ID
> On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:33 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Aki, that was helpful. When I add that I get: >> >> checking for LIBSODIUM... no >> configure: error: Can't build with libsodium: not found >> >> So I have to tell it where libsodium is. >> >> Tried: >> >>
2023 Feb 22
1
Auth-worker, unknown scheme ARGON2ID
> On 22/02/2023 08:41 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:33 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Aki, that was helpful. When I add that I get: > > > > > > checking for LIBSODIUM... no > > > configure: error: Can't build with libsodium: not
2023 Feb 22
1
Auth-worker, unknown scheme ARGON2ID
> On 22/02/2023 07:48 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 4:14 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I?ve spent ages on this and am getting really desperate! :-( > > > > > > CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/homebrew/Cellar/openssl at 3/3.0.8/include
2023 Feb 22
1
Auth-worker, unknown scheme ARGON2ID
> On 22/02/2023 09:10 EET James Brown <jlbrown at bordo.com.au> wrote: > > > On 22 Feb 2023, at 5:53 pm, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > % locate libsodium > > > > > /opt/homebrew/Cellar/libsodium > > > > > /opt/homebrew/Cellar/libsodium/1.0.18_1
2019 Jan 31
1
1.1~pre17 is no longer available for OSX from Homebrew.
Hey Folks, It seems that Homebrew for some reason arbitrarily decided to banish all of the --devel flavors from all of their installable packages.  I couldn't find any discussion as to why or what they intend to replace the function with. **update;  this is where they decided to do this; https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/5060#issuecomment-428149176 But in the meantime, 1.1pre17 is
2014 May 10
2
[LLVMdev] error compiling llvm 2.9/3.2 from source on macosx (possibly stdlibc++ issue)
Hello, I've some exceptions which I would like to solve to build LLVM+Clang from source on MacOSX 10.8+. " /Users/travis/build/vpmedia/crossbridge/llvm-2.9/lib/Transforms/Utils/CodeExtractor.cpp:728:28: [0;1;31m error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'std::vector<BasicBlock *>' std::vector<BasicBlock*> Succs(succ_begin(codeReplacer), " I
2013 Oct 02
2
[Bug 10179] New: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 Summary: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chdiza at gmail.com
2014 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] Can't build against LLVM-3.5 with CMake: CMakeExports.cmake broken?
On Sep 9, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > This is happening because the ``LLVMConfigLibs`` makefile variable is > empty when used in ``cmake/modules/Makefile``. It is normally set in > Makefile.rules . However if you build with --enable-shared this > variable doesn't get set and so LLVMExports.cmake isn't generated > correctly. > >
2015 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] Problem with InsertPointGuard ABI?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:30 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:55 PM Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> > wrote: > > > > Paweł Bylica <chfast at gmail.com> writes: > > > I can confirm that the issue has been caused by NDEBUG flag. >
2015 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6 homebrew core formula
Dear LLVMers, I am working on a project that depends on LLVM 3.6. For Homebrew, the core formula is pointing to LLVM 3.5.1 and LLVM 3.6 is only available as a homebrew tap. Since no core formula can depend in versioned taps, would it be possible to get the llvm36 (since already released) formula into homebrew core and replace the 3.5.1 formula? Thank you very much, Sebastian -------------- next