similar to: Rsync between 2 datacenters not working

Hmmm, looks indeed like changing the mtu helps, strange thing is that with the bigger mtu sometimes I had no problems and often TB are copied without problems. Problem is I can't test the connection that much because the connection has been established by a third party and it is just some vlan without any hops. But thanks for the link to the nfs-test that looks interesting!

If reducing the MTU is helping, you might look into turning on Path MTU Discovery. NFS can be fast for large transfers if you tune it. http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/nfs-test.html NFS is not terribly secure though - at least v2 and v3 weren't. Not sure about v4. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Marc Roos via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Kevin, Dan,

Note that if you do this you are stuck with --whole-file On 03/25/2018 04:36 PM, Dan Stromberg via rsync wrote: > You could try using an automounter, like autofs, in combination with > sshfs. It'll be slower, possibly a lot slower, but it should be more > reliable over an unreliable connection. > > I've been using: > remote

I still stuck with these errors packet_write_wait: Connection to 192.168.10.43 port 22: Broken pipe rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (534132435 bytes received so far) [receiver] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [receiver=3.0.9] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (27198 bytes received so far) [generator] rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad

On 02/12/2018 07:24 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2018-02-12, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> Running CentOS 7 on workstation and having a problem with ssh >> disconnects. My ssh_config contains: >> >> Host * >> TCPKeepAlive yes >> ServerAliveInterval 30 >> ServerAliveCountMax 300 >> >> and sshd_config on the server contains:

I have some (for testing) Debian based client/workstation connected to my AD. Signing to the AD works as a domain/user should. These clients can, via Nautilus file manager, access shares on the file server manually that the *signed in domain user* is permitted to "see". I would prefer to connect these files and the domain user home directory automatically at sign in without manual

I mounted vpopmail/domains in sshfs. root at 192.168.239.205:/mnt/disk-b/domains on /mnt/domains type fuse.sshfs (rw,nos uid,nodev,max_read=65536,allow_other) I used qmail+dovecot+vpopmail+mysql dovecot-2.0.beta4. I mounted sshfs with vpopmail/domains directory. my /usr/local/etc/dovecot/conf.d/mail.conf file mmap_disable = yes dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes

Hi all, I am trying to mount on boot a sshfs filesystem. I have tried this in /etc/fstab backup at myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup fuse.sshfs nonempty,allow_other 0 2 but only works when network works. I have also tried this in my crontab: @reboot sshfs -o idmap=backup myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup but doesn?t seem to work either. What else can I try?

Hello Hendrik Can you help input 2 commands 'mount' and 'df -TPh' on OMV, and post the output to us, thank you. -- Regards, Jones Syue | ??? QNAP Systems, Inc.

sshd also dies when certain other kinds of traffic is generated, such as `man pw' using the most pager[1], and many x11 apps such as emacs. However, it is stable when running simple x11 apps such as xeyes, and the link its self is stable -- a terminal will stay connected without issue for days, as long as not much happens in it. Also a sshfs connection dies immediately. ssh -Y karren gkrellm

On 06/10/2013 01:41 PM, pr.G wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:29:32AM +0400, свящ. Георгий Гольцов wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >>> On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys >>>> inside container?

Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine except I can't delete files from sshfs unless they are in 0777 chmodded directory. Even if that files were putted trough smbclient. I can read files, write files (regardless their directory permissions) but not delete them. Here is my share config: [myshare] comment = shre over sshfs path = /home/kli/work/remotes/dev

On 25/09/2020 12:55, Robert Wooden wrote: > Thanks Dr, Naumer and Rowland. > > Although still not quite correct, my pam_mount.conf.xml looks like: > root at lws4:~# cat /etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml > <debug enable="1" /> > <volume fstype="fuse" > server="mbr04.subdom.example.com <http://mbr04.subdom.example.com>" >

On 02/12/2018 06:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:25 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> Running CentOS 7 on workstation and having a problem with ssh disconnects. >> My ssh_config contains: >> >> Host * >> TCPKeepAlive yes >> ServerAliveInterval 30 >> ServerAliveCountMax 300 >> >> and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 Summary: -x with sshfs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs at dotcommie.net QAContact: rsync-qa at

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > On 06/09/2013 08:14 PM, pr.G wrote: > > Hello. > > > > Is it possible to start container via libvirt_lxc without mounting /sys > > inside container? > > > > When I start container via lxc-start and do not add mount point to config, > > then /sys inside container is empty. > > >

New to sshfs and new to this mailing list so please guide me if required. Is this a bug? When sshfs is given option -o rellinks, it responds with fuse: unknown option `rellinks' According to my understanding of the sshfs man page and --help output this option a) is valid and b) should be passed to the module, not to fuse. Versions: SSHFS version 2.4 FUSE library version: 2.8.5

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 Summary: please don't use client-server model for local copies Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/400489/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi, after trying sshfs to mount a remote file system on a server with the result that sshfs will sooner or later get stuck and require a reboot of the client, I'm fed up with it and am looking for alternatives. So next I would like to use NFS over a VPN connection instead. To minimize the instances of the NFS mount getting stuck, it might be helpful to use autofs. What happens when the