similar to: rsync very very slow with multiple instances at the same time.

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20180323/66c46d5a/attachment.html>

Ok, so i did some tests. find /path -type f -ls > /dev/null First on my local SSD disk (1.9 millions files) : 1 find : real 2m16.743s user 0m7.607s sys 0m45.952s 10 concurrent finds (approx same results for each) : real 4m48.629s user 0m11.013s sys 2m0.288s Almost double time is somehow logic. Now same test on my server on the iSCSI disk (when there is no other activity) (2.8 millions

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've compiled rsync 3.0.3 on OSX 10.4 PPC via the plain jane ./configure; make method (no patches). The resulting binary has then been moved to /usr/local/bin/rsync3 and copied to a OSX 10.5.4 Intel client machine as rsync3. I then run the following command: rsync3 -vvv -e ssh -avAX --progress --delete -

Did anyone ever get rsync3 to compile as a universal binary and work correctly on both tiger and leopard on ppc and intel? David.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it > should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied. > Doesn't it tries to create all (empty) directories first? > On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: > > > > > > Em seg, 19

what is the source and destination filesystem? here is some report that rsync has some problem with HFS+ filesystems and "ressource forks": http://quesera.com/reynhout/misc/rsync+hfsmode/ but as you are using ubuntu and not osx i`m curious what`s the problem, so i think we need more information here. regards roland > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Dezember 2014 um 15:31 Uhr > Von:

Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly > determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole > command line? > rsync -avP /data-old/ /data > > On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >

It creates the directories as it needs them. If you want to watch it looking through files it doesn't need to copy you can add -ii (see --itemize-changes for what the output means). On 03/20/2018 05:24 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net > <mailto:kmk at sanitarium.net>> wrote: > > Nothing

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20141214/3d32f770/attachment.html>

Hi all, I'm using rsync 3 to copy all files from one disk to another. The files were writen by Minio, an S3 compatible opensource backend. The number of files is dozens of millions, almost each of them within its own directory. Rsync takes a long time, when not several hours, to even start syncing files. I already see a few reasons: - it first create all directories to put files in, that

Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied. On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote: > > > Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync > <rsync at lists.samba.org <mailto:rsync at lists.samba.org>> escreveu: > > The performance of rsync with

hi, as it's been awhile since my last attempts w/ v269, i'm building the latest rsync3-svs on osx 10.4.8; looking to see what's evolved re: acls & xattrs support on osx ... @ build, i note complaint abt a missing yodl2man, which originates with YODL. YODL, then requires icmake. as neither is available on osx, it's src build time. on building debian's icmake (already

Hi Bryan, thanks for your kind reply but it happend only with some fonts not all font file, (email with attachment is under verification by admin, so i resend this without attachment file) here i attach 2 screenshot one original folder and second backup folder, you can notice that the font .otf, .ttf, .dfont have no problem in rsync it copied as it is but the font that not show extension (Font

Hello, Noticed this (bug?) while testing out rsync. For a little background, I need to push files real-time to some front-end servers, and I am thinking of switching from some custom shell scripts that do this job to rsync. I am thinking of running rsync as a daemon on the front-end servers, and doing an upload from the back-end server to push the data out as it comes in. So, here is the deal:

Rsync-2.5.2 does not gracefully report connection and transfer errors and always properly return with a non-zero exit code, despite many assurances to the contrary in the code and commit logs. It seems a kludge to handle a special case of lost connections to older servers was FAR too aggressive! With '-vvv' I also print the source of the exit_cleanup() call, and optionally with

The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole command line? On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote: > Hi all, >   > I'm using rsync 3 to copy all files from one disk to another. The files > were writen by Minio, an S3 compatible opensource backend. > > The number of files

Hi! I've just tried to do a backup of a machine with rsync. While doing this (I was reading emails:-) I noted that mbox for mbox, I had no longe new mails, but I've never read off these mailboxes lately... This seemed to be a st_atime problem, and indeed, I could verify that. This is what I used for backup: rsync --archive \ --recursive \

Hi All. On Mac OS10.4, using rsync 3.0, it stops during a transfer. I mount an SMB share, and then use the line: sudo rsync -avhi --delete --stats --timeout=360 --progress --log-file=/Volumes/backup/20080429/rsynclog.txt --exclude="*:*" /Volumes/RAID_One /Volumes/backup/20080429 There's a few terabytes of data, and it never finishes a complete run. It can stop at anywhere during

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 Summary: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr system.posix_acl_default failed: Permission denied Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi all, Can anyone please advise if it is possible to mount a Windows share and view files with chinese filenames ? I am able to view the files on the local disk, however the files on the Windows share display as ??????.htm I have tried mounting with the following commands smbmount //xxxxxxxx/filesync /mnt/filesync -o username=xxxxx,codepage=cp950,isocharset=utf8 or mount -t smbfs -o