Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "rsync time machine backup permissions"
2018 Mar 19
1
rsync time machine backup permissions
sh-3.2# /Users/andre/Desktop/Skripte/rsync_tm
Kopiere Time Machine Backup ...
rsync: chgrp "/Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3/Backups.backupdb/.RecoverySets/0/com.apple.recovery.boot/boot.efi" failed: Operation not permitted (1)
rsync: failed to set times on "/Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3/Backups.backupdb/iMac": Operation not permitted (1)
rsync: symlink "/Volumes/G-DRIVE
2018 Mar 20
2
Very slow to start sync with millions of directories and files
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:49 PM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
> Nothing there should be preventing incremental indexing. That means it
> should start copying as soon as it finds a file that needs to be copied.
>
Doesn't it tries to create all (empty) directories first?
> On 03/20/2018 02:33 PM, Bráulio Bhavamitra wrote:
> >
> >
> > Em seg, 19
2016 Jun 02
2
rsync keeps writing files over
OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret
—itemize-changes?
The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them,
which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777.
What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps?
Thanks,
Blake
On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb"
<rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on
2018 Mar 20
2
Very slow to start sync with millions of directories and files
Em seg, 19 de mar de 2018 11:34, Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org>
escreveu:
> The performance of rsync with a huge number of files is greatly
> determined by every option you are using. So, what is your whole
> command line?
>
rsync -avP /data-old/ /data
>
> On 03/19/2018 09:05 AM, Bráulio Bhavamitra via rsync wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
2016 Feb 04
2
Is there a parameter in rsync to clean $BACKUPDIR before writing to it (--backup-dir=$BACKUPDIR)?
Hi,
I am runing rsync --backup --backup-dir=$BACKUPDIR where the
BACKUPDIR=$(date +%d) to recycle the $BACKUPDIR in a month. But rsync does
not clean the $BACKUPDIR before writing to it in cycling.
I guess you have to clean it manually before the rsync can write to it. As
my $BACKUPDIR is in remote machine, do you have to run ssh to delete it
first before calling rsync in a script? Or if there
2016 Jun 02
2
rsync keeps writing files over
Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you
provide some insight?
This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all
attached to one computer.
rsync -aPh --itemize-changes -n
/Volumes/shuttle_05/2012_79_1_14_1__1199_Workprint /Volumes/3TB_LTO/LT003A/
sending incremental file list
>f..t.......
2017 Apr 07
3
modification times questions
Thank you!
I run --times when I use rsync (I actually use the -a flag) but the times do not transfer over and if I run rsync dryrun with -i I can see that it wants to transfer the files because of times. When I run rsync a second time with your suggestion the times do transfer over. I don't know why...
B
________________________________________
From: rsync [rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org]
2018 Mar 19
2
Very slow to start sync with millions of directories and files
Hi all,
I'm using rsync 3 to copy all files from one disk to another. The files
were writen by Minio, an S3 compatible opensource backend.
The number of files is dozens of millions, almost each of them within its
own directory.
Rsync takes a long time, when not several hours, to even start syncing
files. I already see a few reasons:
- it first create all directories to put files in, that
2016 Jun 02
9
rsync keeps writing files over
Cool Thanks!
Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l"
but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc”
The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why
it wouldn’t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn’t exist
for every file, just the vast majority. So, that just makes it more
confusing.
Yes,
2017 Apr 07
3
modification times questions
How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2016 Jun 24
2
--partial not working?
Hi Kevin,
I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears.
So, if I am running partial (-P) and not using --whole-file or disabling the delta-transmission, why would an incomplete file be deleted and the
2016 Feb 04
1
Is there a parameter in rsync to clean $BACKUPDIR before writing to it (--backup-dir=$BACKUPDIR)?
Hi Kevin,
Thank you very much for the response. Actually, I don't think I need to
clean the backup dir defined in --backup-dir=<backup dir>, when the
contents has already been deleted in the destination (no exist), it will
delete from the backup dir as well in next cycle, correct?
Regards,
- j
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
>
2015 Jan 11
2
Link-dest thinks file is newly created, but it isn't
On Sat Jan 10 2015 at 5:21:33 AM Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What does --itemize-changes say about that file? Try using the stat
> command on the various copies of it to see what is different about them.
>
In my original message, I stated I used --itemize-changes, and I reported
the following:
>
2015 Oct 01
2
Verifying backups
In message <560C79FF.5010302 at sanitarium.net>,
Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote:
>Because you are making two/one. Change to:
>rsync -n -v --itemize-changes -checksum -a one/ two/
OK, I tried it with your suggested command line, and yes, that produces
rather more substantially useful results. However...
Perhaps I am just a bit thick, but I really don't have any
2018 Mar 19
4
rsync time machine backup permissions
Dear rsync users,
I'm trying to copy my Time Machine Backup from my old USB hard drive to a new one. I got error messages, because rsync don't create group and other permissions.
I use rsync 3.1.3.
Did I use the correct parameters? Who has an idea, what mistake?
Thanks!
Best, André
--
The bash script:
#!/bin/bash
source=/Volumes/LaCie\ d2\ Quadra\ v3/Backups.backupdb
2015 Sep 10
2
Doubt on usage of rsync for chown of existing folders
Hi Kevin,
Thank you very much. I changed my user in the remote machine (su).
Then, by trying again with rsync but with no modification in the source folder, I see that file ownership continues the same.
Would be possible for rsync to change the ownership in this case (I am not root) ?
Thanks,
Regards,CJ
Em Quinta-feira, 10 de Setembro de 2015 20:01, Kevin Korb <kmk at
2014 Dec 03
4
encrypted rsyncd - why was it never implemented?
rsync in daemon mode is very powerful, yet it comes with one big
disadvantage: data is sent in plain.
The workarounds are not really satisfying:
- use VPN - one needs to set up an extra service, not always possible
- use stunnel - as above
- use SSH - is not as powerful as in daemon mode (i.e. read only access,
chroot, easy way of adding/modifying users and modules etc.)
Why was encrypted
2016 Dec 17
2
script showing extended stats ( deleted/added ...)
is there a script which analyses rsync output with --itemize-changes ?
i.e. i would like to have extended information on number of deleted files, created directories, changed files....
i know rsync 3.1.x is better with this, but it`s still not in centos 5/6/7 and i don`t want to update tons of systems to get extended statistics, so i wonder if anbody did an analyze script to get that information
2016 Feb 08
2
--link-dest not working on remote server (running daemon)
Thanks for the reply. The link-dest is different. It is Feb 1 while the
source is Feb 2.
I tried setting path = /media/external/ for the daemon and using
rsync -a -v -i --delete --link-dest=backup-2016-02-01-0100
--password-file=/media/external/scripts/offsite_rsync.pass
/media/external/backup/backup-2016-02-02-0100 backup at 192.168.2.102:
:offsite/backup
So all three (link-dest, source,
2013 Aug 02
2
hardlinking and -R (multiple source directories)
Hi,
hardlinking (-H) works perfectly while using a syntax like -avhxSDH <SRC>
<DEST>
Now I have to mirror multiple SRC directories which contain hardlinks. e.
g: src1/a is a hardlink to src2/b
-RavhxSDH SRC1 SRC2 DEST
does not preserve hardlink a and b in DEST. Is there any chance to do that?
Thanks
lopiuh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...