similar to: Comparison of huge files ineffective?

Your observation would be right if you are using --checksum which you shouldn't be. Otherwise, unless you are using --whole-file rsync will use its differential algorithm to compare the files. If you are using --progress you will see it step through the file at a faster speed than the network is capable of. If there is no difference then rsync will go very fast to 100% then do any metadata

Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (Mi 14 Mär 2018 14:52:55 CET): > Your observation would be right if you are using --checksum which you > shouldn't be. Otherwise, unless you are using --whole-file rsync will > use its differential algorithm to compare the files. If you are using > --progress you will see it step through the file at a faster speed than Ok,

Do not use --checksum. It has an extremely limited use case. Normally it is much slower than simply re-copying everything. --checksum means checksum every file on both ends (even files that only exist on one end) before doing anything else even if doing so causes a timeout failure. --checksum is the only part of rsync stupid enough to leave one end idle potentially for hours. On 03/14/2018

Hi, I used --partial to transfer files from my local computer (rsync 3.1.2, Debian) to a remote computer (rsync 3.1.1 WD MyPassport Storage device) The files get transferred, but after successful transfer, the files are not renamed from .<tmpfile> to <file>. Where to go next? Here is the verbose output after transferring an empty file heiko at blade:~/Pictures$ rsync

Hi, recently I had to sync really huge files (VM images), represented either as block devices (on one or both sides) or as regular files. It *seemed* that Rsync didn't work well with block devices (the --copy-devices didn't 'work for me, maybe I'm stupid or it's broken in the Rsync that ships with Debian bullseye). And additionally I ran into performance and resource issues

Hi, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 with a director/backend setup. The user base is about 4711 users currently. If I start at one of the directors doveadm search -A all savedbefore 5000d it terminates with doveadm(1rrissma): Error: doveadm server disconnected before handshake: EOF doveadm(1rrissma): Error: 2001:638:913:f33::5:ff:24245: Command search failed for 1phaaman: EOF

Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> (So 30 Dez 2018 23:56:44 CET): > I think --partial might be a red herring here. It only applies to what > happens when rsync is aborted in the middle of a file. What happens > without -P? Same happens w/o --partial. I append 2 logs: - a from localhost to remote server, exposing the missing "rename" - b from localhost to

Hi, Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 21 Nov 2016 11:50:13 CET): > a) Routing stage > You need to interact with the user database dovecot uses. > Either you access the user database directory (flat file, LDAP, > whatever) or you use the ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to > dovecot. The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore. Using $

Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 00:10:50 CEST): > Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 23:49:20 CEST): > ? > > > > Proxying in general does check that hostname matches the SSL certificate, because both the hostname and IP address are sent to login process. So it should work in a way that host=<hostname> and

> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> wrote: > > > Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): > > Hi Aki, > > > > aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > > ? > > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/,

Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> (Di 13 Okt 2015 21:36:40 CEST): ? > > I see: > > > > a) pass the host *names* to the director too, for CN verification > > purpose > > > > May be in struct mail_host could be a field for the original > > hostname we used to obtain the adress(es)? > > Does the attached patch work? Compiles,

Hi Timo Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mi 14 Okt 2015 01:10:20 CEST): ? > Ah, the information comes from the other director running. The other one > is using an unpatched version of dovecot. Your patch for backend-certificate verification works. Thank you for the good and fast work. Is there any chance that this will make it into Dovecot's next release? BTW: The

Hi Aki, aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): ? > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try the xi.dovecot.fi packages. With 2.2.24 it works as expected. Due to the project state I'll

Hi, Peter Chiochetti <pch at myzel.net> (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST): > Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: > In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job" The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both /etc/init.d/dovecot /lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service > While xi packages places its own init script

Hi, Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command, the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation: ? login ? C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1

Hi Heiko, Here is the router: virtual_aliases: driver = redirect debug_print = "R: Check address using virtual_aliases for $local_part@$domain" allow_fail allow_defer hide data = CHECK_VIRTUAL_ALIASES user = vmail group = mail local_user: debug_print = "R: local_user for $local_part@$domain" driver = accept

Hello, I'm using dovecot 2.2.9 and a director/backend setup. On the director I've the LMTP in proxy mode, mapping the users to one of the backends. The backends to quota check and return the OverQuota message already at RCPT TO time. Here is what I typed, connected to the director Connection to director1 2525 port [tcp/*] succeeded! 220 director1.rz.hs-example.de Dovecot

Hi, Mark Foley <mfoley at ohprs.org> (Do 12 Nov 2015 23:31:39 CET): > According to a message to this list from Oli Schacher, > http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-June/059493.html, all I need to do is copy the deleted > emails to their original folder and dovecot will take care of it: > ? > > exactly, just copy the mail from your backup back into the users > >

Hello, I'm just asking myself, how I get multiple quota rules into the LDAP userdb. Dovecot is 2.2.9 userdb_attrs = ? fooQuotaRule=quota_rule=%$ which allows me to have an user db entry as fooQuotaRule: *:storage=1000:messages=50 fooQuotaRule: Trash:storage=500 But, if I'd like to have another quota rule for a submailbox of that user? doveadm user returns the first

Hi, it seems that Squirrel mail uses Mailbox annotations for storing Expire times on the Server. It's an Cyrus server currently. (I've no clue how cyrexpire is able to read it's information from the annotiations) Does dovecot support some similiar mechanism? Or - does anybody know anything about how it's supposed to work on Cyrus and how it can be emulated/simulated with dovecot?