similar to: rsync of a reflink from OCFS2

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "rsync of a reflink from OCFS2"

2018 Mar 14
3
rsync of a reflink from OCFS2
no backup - no mercy ----- On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rubson at gmail.com wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay >> bytes to the file from the day before. >> But it doesn't: >> >> ha-idg-1:/cluster/guests/servers_alive # time rsync -av --stats
2018 Mar 14
3
rsync of a reflink from OCFS2
--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a little). Local copies force --whole-file for a good reason. On 03/14/2018 10:05 AM, Ben RUBSON via rsync wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> ----- On
2012 Sep 11
1
problem starting virt-manager
Hi, i try to run virt-manager on a SLES 11 SP1 box. I'm using kernel 2.6.32.12 and virt-manager 0.9.4-106.1.x86_64 . The system is a 64bit box. Here is the output: ========================= pc56846:/media/idg2/SysAdmin_AG_Wurst/software_und_treiber/virt_manager/sles_11_sp1 # virt-manager & [1] 9659 pc56846:/media/idg2/SysAdmin_AG_Wurst/software_und_treiber/virt_manager/sles_11_sp1 #
2019 Jun 14
1
Re: blockcommit of domain not successfull
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 16:01:18 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > ----- On Jun 13, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Bernd Lentes bernd.lentes@helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote: > > I found further information in /var/log/messages for both occurrences: > > 2019-06-01T03:05:31.620725+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-coredump[14253]: Core Dumping has been disabled for process 30590 (qemu-system-x86). >
2020 Sep 20
1
can't define domain - error: cannot open /dev/null: Operation not permitted
Hi, i have a two-node cluster running on SLES 12 with pacemaker. The cluster refused to start the domains on one node. So i took some of the domains out of the cluster and tried to start it manually. This is what happened: virsh # define /mnt/share/vm_documents-oo.xml error: Failed to define domain from /mnt/share/vm_documents-oo.xml error: cannot open /dev/null: Operation not permitted Same
2018 Mar 09
2
snapshot with libvirt tools or with lvm tools ?
Hi, i asked already a time ago about snapshots. I have some guests, each resides in a raw file, placed on an ext3 fs which is on top of a logical volume, for each guest a dedicated lv. The raw is not a "must have", if there are obvious reasons i can convert them to a qcow2. What i want is a consistent backup of each guest taken overnight. If possible i won't have downtime. I can use
2018 Dec 04
3
concurrent migration of several domains rarely fails
Hi, i have a two-node cluster with several domains as resources. During testing i tried several times to migrate some domains concurrently. Usually it suceeded, but rarely it failed. I found one clue in the log: Dec 03 16:03:02 ha-idg-1 libvirtd[3252]: 2018-12-03 15:03:02.758+0000: 3252: error : virKeepAliveTimerInternal:143 : internal error: connection closed due to keepalive timeout The
2019 Jun 13
2
Re: blockcommit of domain not successfull
----- On Jun 13, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Peter Krempa pkrempa@redhat.com wrote: > > Thanks for comming back to me with the information. > > Unfortunately this is not a full debug log but I can try to tell you > what I see here: I configured libvirtd that way: ha-idg-1:~ # grep -Ev '^$|#' /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf log_level = 1 log_filters="1:qemu 3:remote 4:event
2019 Sep 18
1
Live-Migration not possible: error: operation failed: guest CPU doesn't match specification
Hi, i have atwo node HA-cluster with pacemaker, corosync, libvirt and KVM. Recently i configured a new VirtualDomain which runs fine, but live Migration does not succeed. This is the error: VirtualDomain(vm_snipanalysis)[14322]: 2019/09/18_16:56:54 ERROR: snipanalysis: live migration to ha-idg-2 failed: 1 Sep 18 16:56:54 [6970] ha-idg-1 lrmd: notice: operation_finished:
2018 Dec 07
3
Re: concurrent migration of several domains rarely fails
On 12/6/18 10:12 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i have a two-node cluster with several domains as resources. During testing i >> tried several times to migrate some domains concurrently. >> Usually it suceeded, but rarely it failed. I found one clue in the log: >> >> Dec 03 16:03:02 ha-idg-1 libvirtd[3252]: 2018-12-03 15:03:02.758+0000: 3252:
2018 Oct 15
3
snapshots with virsh in a pacemaker cluster
Hi, i have a two node cluster with virtual guests as resources. I'd like to snapshot the guests once in the night and thought i had a procedure. But i realize that things in a cluster are a bit more complicated than expected :-)) I will shutdown the guests to have a clean snapshot. I can shutdown the guests via pacemaker. But then arises the first problem: When i issue a "virsh
2020 Sep 21
0
Fwd: can't define domain - error: cannot open /dev/null: Operation not permitted
> Von: "Lentes, Bernd" <bernd.lentes@helmholtz-muenchen.de> > Datum: 21. September 2020 um 18:38:48 MESZ > An: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> > Betreff: Aw: can't define domain - error: cannot open /dev/null: Operation not permitted > > Hi Martin, > > after configuring the logging and a restart of the service the problem dissapeared
2019 May 15
1
domain still running although snapshot-file is deleted !?!
Hi, i have a strange situation: A domain is still running where domblklist points to a snapshot file and also dumpxml says the current drive is that snapshot file. But the file has been deleted hours ago. And the domain is still running. I can login via ssh, the database and the webserver are still running, domain is performant. How can that be ? Also lsof shows that the file is deleted:
2019 Jun 13
0
Re: blockcommit of domain not successfull
----- On Jun 13, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Bernd Lentes bernd.lentes@helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote: I found further information in /var/log/messages for both occurrences: 2019-06-01T03:05:31.620725+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-coredump[14253]: Core Dumping has been disabled for process 30590 (qemu-system-x86). 2019-06-01T03:05:31.712673+02:00 ha-idg-2 systemd-coredump[14253]: Process 30590 (qemu-system-x86) of
2018 Oct 15
0
Re: snapshots with virsh in a pacemaker cluster
Pacemaker always knows where its resources are running. Query it, stop the domain, then use the queried location as the host to which to issue the snapshot? Cheers, Peter On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, 20:36 Lentes, Bernd, < bernd.lentes@helmholtz-muenchen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > i have a two node cluster with virtual guests as resources. > I'd like to snapshot the guests once in the
2018 Oct 20
2
rsync of big image files from virtual hosts takes lot of time
Hi, i'd like to rsync some image files from virtual hosts each night. The image files are between 50GB and 400GB big. I thought rsync would be the appropriate solution because it just transfers the differences, not the whole file. But nevertheless rsync takes hours. The images aren't much modified over the day, i would expect just some tens of megabyte needed to be transfered. I have the
2019 Jun 04
2
blockcommit of domain not successfull
Hi, i have several domains running on a 2-node HA-cluster. Each night i create snapshots of the domains, after copying the consistent raw file to a CIFS server i blockcommit the changes into the raw files. That's running quite well. But recent the blockcommit didn't work for one domain: I create a logfile from the whole procedure:
2018 Feb 13
3
snapshot of a raw file - how to revert ?
Hi, i have the following system: pc59093:~ # cat /etc/os-release NAME="SLES" VERSION="11.4" VERSION_ID="11.4" PRETTY_NAME="SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4" ID="sles" ANSI_COLOR="0;32" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:suse:sles:11:4" pc59093:~ # uname -a Linux pc59093 3.0.101-84-default #1 SMP Tue Oct 18 10:32:51 UTC 2016 (15251d6) x86_64
2018 Dec 06
0
Re: concurrent migration of several domains rarely fails
> Hi, > > i have a two-node cluster with several domains as resources. During testing i > tried several times to migrate some domains concurrently. > Usually it suceeded, but rarely it failed. I found one clue in the log: > > Dec 03 16:03:02 ha-idg-1 libvirtd[3252]: 2018-12-03 15:03:02.758+0000: 3252: > error : virKeepAliveTimerInternal:143 : internal error: connection
2013 Sep 27
6
[Bug 10170] New: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10170 Summary: rsync should support reflink similar to cp --reflink Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at shubin.ca