similar to: rsync does hours of "fake-work" after failure

Rowland penny via samba wrote: > So your server doesn't seem to be able to find winbindd, are you sure it > is running ? > > What does this show: > > ps ax | grep '[w]inbind' > > What OS is this ? It's SuSE Linux Enterprise 15sp1. winbindd is definitely running, I showed that in the first mail in the output of "rcwinbind status", there you can

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul

Hi Rowland, thanks for all your input! Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Could it be Selinux or Apparmor (not sure which SLES uses) stopping smbd > contacting winbindd ? No, none of these is running on our systems. > Could the SLES Samba packages be wrong ? Yes, that's a possibility. I opened a SR with SUSE support, but they usually take some time to analyse and propose a

Hi Rowland, > Remove 'map untrusted to domain = Yes', it has been removed. > > Add 'domain logons = Yes' > > This gets it back to being a PDC: thanks for the hints! I did that, but it doesn't help. I guess the problem is not on the PDC server but on SERVER2. That's the one that got upgraded and stopped working (even with the non-pdc config of SERVER1). I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12940 Bug ID: 12940 Summary: rsync: -C/--cvs-exclude does not ignore SCM ignore files (patch) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hi, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > which doesn't surprise me. Wasn't "security=domain" removed in that > timeframe? I've found no hint that security=domain was removed. Do you have a reference for that? https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html still lists it as option and in many examples. > You may want to switch to security=ads.w We

Hi, the man page states For systems that support extended-attribute namespaces, a copy being done by a super-user copies all namespaces except system.*. That's the reason why NFAv4 ACLs are not copied as they are in the system.nfs4_acl (or system.nfs4acl) namespace. Why are those namespaces excluded? Not being able rsync ACLs von NFSv4 is a major drawback now that NFsv4 becomes

Hi, I'm not subscribed to the list, so please cc me if you want to reach me. We've found some interesting problem with some Fujitsu-Siemens PCs using pxelinux: The PCs are "FS Scenico L" with Athlon XP 1800+ CPUs and Via KT266 chipset. We tried to boot off pxe using pxelinux 2.09/2.10 with several 3com 3c905-* cards. The PCs loaded the kernel but right after

Hi, we've problems getting samba shares to work after upgrading from 4.7 to 4.9. We have one samba PDC server providing some shares and the users via local passdb.tdb file. Its smb.conf (names/ips changed): [global] security = user encrypt passwords = yes passdb backend = tdbsam:/etc/samba/passdb.tdb workgroup = OURWORKGROUP netbios name = SERVER1

Hi, we do a 1:1 backup from our main raid to a backup raid every night with rsync -a --delete /mnt/raid1/ /mnt/raid2 rsync is 3.09, filesystems are ext3, OS is SLES 11 SP1. The rsync process takes several hours, even if no file has changed at all. Using -vv I see that rsync compares all files every time and that takes long for some hundreds of millions of small files. Can I tell rsync it

Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Summary: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ehaupt at

On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 06:37:57AM -0500, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > I have Samba shares mounted to my Linux workstation. Mostly I access files on the Samba server over the Samba mount. I use mount.cifs to bring up these mounts. > > For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the > server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:21:17 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>>

On 03/11/2019 11:37, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > Greetings Samba team, > > It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. > > Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually > that was yesterday I applied them. > > >> samba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First, don't use -z on a local copy. It will only make rsync slower for no reason at all. Second, 45 million files means 90 million calls to stat(). This will take a while even if nothing needs copying. On 01/21/2016 03:20 AM, dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million

Hi there: I am testing rsync with a large number of small files. I am using 'tee' to keep the log, and I noticed that the log file was growing very quickly. It seems that the progress text refreshes too often: building file list ... ?0 files... ?100 files... ?200 files... ?300 files... ?... ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s??? 0:10:20 (xfr#478709, to-chk=9/537759) ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s???

Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 >>> Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Bug ID: 13423 Summary: Checksum option does not work as expected when append-verify is used Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core