similar to: [Bug 13071] New: [PATCH] Allow --partial-dir with --inplace

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13083 Bug ID: 13083 Summary: [PATCH] Use both partial file + basis file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 Bug ID: 13082 Summary: [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13445 Bug ID: 13445 Summary: Fuzzy searching in link-dest tries to open regular file as directory Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Summary: report --stats output when termination signal arrives Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

Hi, I frequently rsync larger files from my rented server to my PC. Sometimes I have to stop the rsync process and restart it a while after (e.g. I'm shutting down my PC for the night, ...), sometimes several times per source file. I like the two following features: (1) The unfinished files should stay in a own directory (I call it '.dl'). I'm talking here about the 'temp'

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14401 Bug ID: 14401 Summary: unicode character conversion problem from MacOS to Linux despite iconv Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi, I need to use rsync with options inplace and no-whole-file, but have problems with transfers of large files being frequently interrupted. partial-dir could be the solution, but it does not work with inplace-updating of destination files. I am thinking of doing the sync in two steps: 1) sync with --partial-dir and --backup-dir to send updated files to a different directory at the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7123 Summary: Use both old dest file and partial file as basis data Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: matt at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371 Bug ID: 14371 Summary: Combined Exclude & Protect Filter Type Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

Hi, i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error. (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a reconnect every 24 hours) i had a script which detect the rsync error and restart the transmission. this means that if a file has transfered e.g. 80 % i start again from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl

I believe that the changes to support --preallocate and --sparse together have broken --preallocate by itself (commit f3873b3d88b61167b106e7b9227a20147f8f6197) The previous behavior of --preallocate was to do just that: reserve blocks in the filesystem WITHOUT setting the size of the file to the final length. The reported filesize would change as the preallocated blocks were actually written.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13320 Bug ID: 13320 Summary: file contents cause rsync to fail (with certains args and dir structure) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi all, >From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions: --inplace The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does not delete the file) So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for resuming a file with the following steps: 1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ard@waikato.ac.nz

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101 Bug ID: 11101 Summary: support writing to devices Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: jpyeron at

Hi! As I commonly spell --inplace as --in-place, I'd like to suggest this simple patch: commit 5689f99b702788044a45e13582559832cf986328 Author: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de> Date: Wed Jun 26 22:49:31 2019 +0200 Allow "--in-place" as an alternative option name for "--inplace". diff --git a/options.c b/options.c index e5b0cb68..7ff0c51d 100644 ---

Hi, I have written a 'smallish' patch to implement the --inplace option as discussed on this mailing list at various points in the past. It makes a small modification to the sender algorithm so that it won't ask the receiver to relocate blocks from earlier in the file when running with the --inplace option. I would appreciate any testing and feedback people can provide! I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12817 Bug ID: 12817 Summary: [PATCH] Allow daemon itself to chroot Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a little). Local copies force --whole-file for a good reason. On 03/14/2018 10:05 AM, Ben RUBSON via rsync wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> ----- On