similar to: --no-omit-dir-times does not override --backup

source.c, function source_reserve() : Function avl_tree_wlock(global.source_tree) call must be placed before do-while, not inside the cycle. My correction in block _DIGI: #define _DIGI ... if(mount[0] != '/') ICECAST_LOG_WARN("Source at \"%s\" does not start with '/', clients will be " "unable to connect", mount);

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7668 Summary: Add --omit-symlink-times option, same purpose as --omit- dir-times Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hello, I merged the fallback-override feature in icecast-kh22. I'll send you the 4 modified files (perhaps you want to integrate them in your release, but also I'm not sure about locking or not the main source before moving the clients : if(source->fallback_override && source->fallback_mount) { /* get fallback source */ avl_tree_rlock (global.source_tree);

diff -u --recursive icecast/src/admin.c icecast-new/src/admin.c --- icecast/src/admin.c 2003-07-18 16:29:23.000000000 -0400 +++ icecast-new/src/admin.c 2003-08-06 19:18:32.000000000 -0400 @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ html_write(client, "HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n" "Content-Type: text/html\r\n" "\r\n"); - DEBUG1("Sending XSLT

Hello all, when the "write only = yes" option is used on rsync server, the client can't download any file from the server. My question is, if in that case the rsync protocol will allow the client to read the server directory content or not. The question is not about if standard rsync client will allow to do that - I verified that using "--list-only" client option fails in

Hi all, I recently ran into some problems with rsync. My plan is to renew some of our old administration concepts from early 90's, I already replaced rdist with rsync a few years ago. Because of the rdist legacy, the current method requires synchronizing files into 6 different locations, {/alt,/usr/alt}/{hostdep,sysdep,hutdep}, which in turn are prioritized by a tool that just symlinks

Hello, after the reply of Jerome Alet, I forward our questions to you. I hope it is now the right place to put it. Could you please send your answers, questions, comments to interopcast-general@nongnu.org so everyone in the group can get a copy of it. Thank you. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerome Alet" <alet@librelogiciel.com> To: <interopcast-general@nongnu.org>

Why does using --delete -b --backup-dir relative/path puts the deleted files in the target folder, while using the full path works as expected? my experimentation... root@feral:/tmp/test (0)>uname -a Linux feral 2.4.22-1.2115.nptlsmp #1 SMP Wed Oct 29 15:30:09 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux root@feral:/tmp/test (0)>rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26

Hello, I am using rsync v2.5.6 to backup our entire server filesystem over the network to a central backup server. I have copied the example script from the rsync website (http://rsync.samba.org/examples.html) to create incremental backups, the --backup-dir seems to have a strange side-effect. Everything goes well, but on the server side where the backup is stored I can't seem to break out

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ard@waikato.ac.nz

take a look at rsnapshot http://www.rsnapshot.org/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Blake Carver [mailto:lists@lisnews.com] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:35 AM > To: rsync@lists.samba.org > Subject: Question on --backup --backup-dir Switches For Incremental > Backs > > > I current do some rsync backups with a command like so every day > > rsync -az

Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to get filters purely for the two backup flags. They would work in a similar manner to the current ones except that they would only work on files to be backed up in order to indicate what should be included in the backup and what should be excluded. This came up for me as part of daily server backups where I use --backup-dir to have, effectively, daily

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412 ------- Additional Comments From bob@proulx.com 2004-12-23 09:59 ------- I do not believe this bug is completely fixed in 2.6.3. I am still seeing many errors of the type described. Here is one example: rsync: mkdir "/mnt/a/hpsvoh/incr-2004-12-23/home/haehre/filtered_backup/wjemulator/sherman/hppa" failed: File exists (17) I

I current do some rsync backups with a command like so every day rsync -az -e ssh --stats --delete --exclude "stuff" / user@server:/home/user/ What I want to do is have some incremental backups in there in subdirectories. So, for example, something like this on the remote server /home/user/something.tuesday /home/user/something.friday I thought the --backup --backup-dir Switches were

On Tuesday 13 January 2004 17:15, Melanie wrote: > Hi, > > On 2004.01.13 02:32 Michael Smith wrote: > > Since we've now (finally!) got 2.0 out the door, I'm now coming back to > > these > > patches - hoping to actually get the functionality incorporated. > > > > I've got a few questions, though: > > 1) Documentation: did you ever manage to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl

Hi all, I am getting problem with --backup-dir option in rsync. I want to take backup of the file before i am synching the new changes. I am using -b option. And i am specifying the backup dir and suffix for the file also. Backup is taking for the old back up files also. So i am getting directories inside directories in a loop. Kindly help me to get rid of this. Thanks for any help. Regards,

Hello all, I have a question. The man page of rsync: SYNOPSIS rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST R?SUM? DES OPTIONS --backup-dir effectue des sauvegardes dans ce r?pertoire What is the difference between 'DEST' and the rsync option '--backup-dir='? Thank you very much. paco

Hi, In 3.0.4, encountered a problem with dot-dir path (e.g. , foo/./bar) inside a -files-from file when the root of the transfer isn't in the current directory. This was fixed in 3.05 (well, partially). 3.0.5 bug fixes release info: - Fixed the use of a dot-dir path (e.g. foo/./bar) inside a --files-from file when the root of the transfer isn't the current directory.

With the following rsync settings: cd /home/lina_backup rsync -R -v -z -rlptgo --delete \ --password-file=password \ --include-from=include --exclude="*" \ --backup --backup-dir=./`date -d yesterday +%Y-%m-%d` \ rsync://root@lina/backup current I would expect the backup directory to be /home/lina_backup/2001-12-29. But it becomes /home/lina_backup/current/2001-12-29. Is this a