similar to: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion?

Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. Don Kuenz via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before

You probably want --inplace for this rather than partial. The upside of --partial is that the existing file isn't replaced until there is a complete file to replace it with. The downside is building up that entire new file. On 09/05/2017 12:01 AM, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. > > Don

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 10:45:26PM +0000, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before rsync times > out to enable a nightly local backup to complete. The local backup

Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 09 Dec 2016 21:52:39 UTC > Don via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> The backup and restore Samba AD DC section of SambaWiki [1] refers to >> ./source4/scripting/bin/samba_backup . Although my recent version of >> samba_backup uses tdbbackup on ldb files, it

An old, standalone Samba 4.1 DC was originally provisioned with --use-rfc2307. When a new Samba 4.7 DC was joined to the original domain --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' was not used. How do you correct this oversight? Is it possible to remove the new Samba 4.7 from the original domain and then join it to the original domain yet again but this time use

Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File

Rowland penny wrote: > On 11/11/2019 01:22, Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Error occurs on FreeBSD 12.1 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 --interactive >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/local/bin/samba-tool", line 33, in <module>

Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: > >> Samba 4.8. It turns out that both the FreeBSD bin and source packages >> are broke. Fully functional, error free binaries were eventually created >> by manually installing about a dozen requisite packages, one at a time >> along the way, whenever make halted on an error. >> To add to a difficult day, something

Andrew Bartlett wrote: > Don Kuenz wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 >> server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a >> network isolated from the Production Server (PS). >> The DR's /var/db/samba4 directory, which contains the private >> directory,

Greetings, The process to join a new samba 4.6 DC to an existing samba 4.1 DC repeatedly caused: samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names to fail on the new DC with: Failed to connect host x.x.x.x on port 49152 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Noted: both samba versions are obsolete and will be updated post haste. Regardless, samba_dnsupdate was accidentally invoked on the new DC while the

On 28/05/2020 05:14, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > bind914-9.14.6 and bind-tools-9.14.6 were built and installed on a new > FreeBSD 12.1 samba DC. Then a prebuilt samba410-4.10.13 package was > installed. Both bind-dns/named.conf and BIND9_DLZ libs are missing. Is this using the ZFS filesystem ? If so, how ? What do you mean by 'a prebuilt

From: Feizhou > I know what a Kerberos authentication system is. > You mean a core component in Samba 3.0's functionality as an ADS client. You're still artificially limiting your understanding. Kerberos (with the MS extensions in the case of 200x/XP) is how objects authenticate each other and grant tickets for access in a Kerberos realm. Samba can use Kerberos how it sees fit.

From: Dag Wieers > Bryan, and you're still belittling people in discussions and get into long > arguments as a result. Pretty please stop doing that. I apologize for any belittling. It is not my intent, but I do see a repeat theme. People thing in single products/projects, not breaking down things into their multiple technologies. That's all I meant by "artificially

Greetings, This post pertains to Samba version 4.16.8 on FreeBSD 13.1. When GPMC.MSC is invoked from within a Windows server domain member, it displays an inconsistency error: <https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8386> <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14927> # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class

Hello I am working on radio tracking data, with a short programme someone gave me and ... which should, supposedly, work ... In this programme, there is the function : getareahr(kern, levels = 95). But i cannot find any 'getareahr' in R ... could anyone help me? thanks! Agn??s

Hello useRs! I'm REALLY having trouble with readline when compiling R. 2.2 from source during ./configure. Here are the last lines of the configure log: checking readline/history.h usability... yes checking readline/history.h presence... yes checking for readline/history.h... yes checking readline/readline.h usability... yes checking readline/readline.h presence... yes checking

Hi, I am having troubles trying to install package "sp" in R (2.13.0) on mac OSX. I have tried installing the package using GUi or function install.packages but it didn't work. Here is the error message I get: also installing the dependency ‘rgdal’ trying URL 'http://cran.univ-lyon1.fr/src/contrib/rgdal_0.6-33.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length

im betting here on a smb.conf that was not 4.6 compliant. port 49152 is not related i my opinion. is there a firewall running? the dynamic port range changed from a low range to high. Greetz Louis Op 17 mrt. 2019, om 22:36, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schreef: On 17 Mar 2019 20:44:12 UTC Don Kuenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

On 2019-11-12 14:06, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > It seems that Samba/FreeBSD became a hot mess during the past couple of > years. Samba 4.8.7 now works on FreeBSD for me. It looks like we're back > to the days of Do It Yourself make from source on FreeBSD. Just a note.... While I was able to "fix" Samba 4.8 port (at least for my needs), currently I'm not investing on

On 15/11/2019 20:16, Don Kuenz via samba wrote: > > Greetings, > > This post pertains to a Disaster Recovery (DR) scenario on a Samba 4.8 > server. The DR server was provisioned as a standalone host, on a Just what do you mean by 'provisioned as a standalone host' ? Do you mean 'samba-tool domain provision --server-role=standalone' ? Rowland