similar to: [Bug 12940] New: rsync: -C/--cvs-exclude does not ignore SCM ignore files (patch)

Ever since I upgraded from Samba 1.9.18 to 2.0.0, I've been having problems with applications started from a Samba share dying silently, or with an Illegal Instruction message, on NT 4.0 Workstation. Since the only configuration change has been the Samba upgrade, that would seem to be the orgin of the problem. Below is my smb.conf file, in case I have something configured (or not configured)

Dear NUT developers and contributors, Back in January 2005 (the 19th to be precise), we started to create an infrastructure to support the NUT development and its newly formed (or formalized) team. Alioth, which is basically a GForge for Debian related efforts, allowed us to move on, and concentrate more on development. First, using CVS, we then quickly moved to Subversion due to the former

Okay since we have a few more people on the list now I see I wanted to get peoples input on a couple things. First of all, I'd like to work on general consensus so I'd like to see what people think of having the list setup to reply back to the list. I know some lists use this and some don't so I'd like to get input on the matter. I'd also like to get input on choice

Greetings, I have a freshly installed Centos 6.2 box with everything (darn! I had to hand select each and every package -- IIRC one of the fedora versions had a nice "select all" checkbox). My questions are: 1. Can somebody suggest a way to select all packages while installing from DVD? 2. Can somebody suggest a versioning system which integrates well with a bug tracking system (I had

Git is a source code management system like CVS, svn, arch, and others. It would be nice to add exclude support to R CMD build and INSTALL so that the .git subdir of an R package is handled appropriately. Here is a possible patch: diff --git a/src/scripts/INSTALL.in b/src/scripts/INSTALL.in index 75da9db..09e5ab5 100644 --- a/src/scripts/INSTALL.in +++ b/src/scripts/INSTALL.in @@ -863,7

Hi all-- I''m starting a new Rails project and I''m preparing to import it into my local Subversion repository. In the past, I''ve just imported the entire set of files generated by ''rails'', but I''m starting to wonder if that is the best way to approach things. For instance, it makes sense to add the log/ directory, but probably not the

Hi all, I've setup two * servers which are SIP interconnected ala osaka/toronto from the * book (before anyone sugggests using IAX instead, no, I NEED to have them SIP interconnected for verification/test purposes). Then I have a Zoiper connected to one of them via IAX (so that * will not reinvite (?)). As soon as I try to call (via Zoiper) an extension on the other * I get a "Failed to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ehaupt at

Dear R-help, I would like to be able to run the following code sequence as a source routine. If I paste it into R via the clipboard it works as expected, but if I source the code instead then the last 3 statements fail. I've also tried writing to the file in place of the sink sequence, but that also hits a snag. R 1.6, w98e2, dfr is a data frame containing the content of Julian

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul

Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying

Hi everyone. I''m choosing an SCM for my current Rails project. Up until now, for my other (non-Rails) codings, I used Darcs and liked it very much. I''d prefer to use Darcs for my Rails development as well. Looking into the matter, I''m somewhat deterred by the appearant dominance of Subversion as the SCM tool of choice for Rails hackers. Is there a technical reason for

On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 06:37:57AM -0500, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > I have Samba shares mounted to my Linux workstation. Mostly I access files on the Samba server over the Samba mount. I use mount.cifs to bring up these mounts. > > For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the > server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:21:17 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>>

On 03/11/2019 11:37, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > Greetings Samba team, > > It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. > > Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually > that was yesterday I applied them. > > >> samba

Hi there: I am testing rsync with a large number of small files. I am using 'tee' to keep the log, and I noticed that the log file was growing very quickly. It seems that the progress text refreshes too often: building file list ... ?0 files... ?100 files... ?200 files... ?300 files... ?... ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s??? 0:10:20 (xfr#478709, to-chk=9/537759) ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s???

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Summary: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Bug ID: 13423 Summary: Checksum option does not work as expected when append-verify is used Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin

I have a scenario where a "broken pipe" condition can happen on a fairly regular basis and in all honesty it is to be expected. We are working with satellite links to moving ship platforms (no it isn't military based) and depending on location, sea conditions, and a few dozen other factors, the data link can become somewhat unstable at times. That and the high-latency for IP