similar to: [Bug 12781] New: rsync library

Hello, I'm author of Lsyncd - the live syncing deamon - http://code.google.com/p/lsyncd/ - a daemon that uses Linux` inotify to watch for filesystem changes - aggregates them for a few seconds and then periodically calls rsync to transfer the changes to target(s). Version 1 was simply aware of directories only, and it called rsync once with --delete -d for every directory in which anything

Dear list, I'd like to have your expertise opinion on following issue. Out of a concrete need we developed an application that will rsync any changes on a local directory structure to a remove system the moment they happen using the linux kernel watch feature. This is in our opinion much more elegant compared to invoking rsync every x seconds/minutes from cron, or having to use a special

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569 Bug ID: 12569 Summary: Missing directory errors not ignored Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: axkibe

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:55:51 +0100 Axel Kittenberger <axkibe at gmail.com> wrote: > > Has someone experience with collecting the changed files > > with a third party tool which detects which files were changed? > > I don't know of sysdig but am the developer of Lsyncd which does > exactly that, collect file changes via inotify event mechanism and > then calls

Hi, we have a huge directory tree. * 17M files (number of files) * 2.2TBytes of data. * Only 0.1% changes per day Current pain: rsyncs directory tree traversal needs to long to discover the changed files. Only few files change. I discovered the tool sysdig which could be used to monitor the files which were changed. Then we could feed the list of changed files to rsync and avoid the

Okay, I gave up fixing that raspberry and going to use some conventional legacy PC instead and reinstall it all. Is there a way I can use the group, user and domain controller IDs from the backups I created to reinstall a new Samba4 DC without the clients noticing? I don't like to rejoin everything yet another time. - Axel

I never figured out how I should tread error 13 from rsync, "Problem with diagnostics". My question is, is this a transient or permanent error? Or how seriously did something go wrong when rsync returns 13? I don't get much smarter reading the rsync source either. For reference this is for Lsyncd, which watches files with inotify and uses rsync to transmit changes to a slave. It

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14262 Bug ID: 14262 Summary: add continuous sync mode using inotify/fanotify/etc Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

Am 09.02.2017 um 16:21 schrieb Ben RUBSON: > >> On 09 Feb 2017, at 16:10, Thomas Güttler <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> >> Am 09.02.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Ben RUBSON: >>>> On 09 Feb 2017, at 10:05, Thomas Güttler <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have a huge

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7778 Summary: --inplace does extra WRITE operations Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ildar at altlinux.ru

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 14:43:57 +0100 Axel Kittenberger <axkibe at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Not only that, but inotify is not guaranteed. (At least not on > > 3.16.0. Can't say regards later versions.) So you might miss some > > changes. > > > > Got any info on that? > > I noted that MOVE_FROM and MOVE_TO events are not guaranted to arrive

Thanks Donovan, I downloaded the librsync 0.9.6 from sf and it compiled just fine believe it or not in the new visual studio.net. There where warnings but no fatal errors and the exe seems to be running just fine. I've tested it just now on a 60 meg mdb file that I've been trying to backup.. it seems to work great!. I even saved the original so I could apply patches and then file compare

Hey, I'm currently adding rsync to pacman (http://archlinux.org/pacman). A static version of the program is used for rescue operations. Because of this it is impossible to use the rsync client programm via an execve call and we need a version implemented in C. So I started implementing it. But the rsync source isn't beautiful or structured - it's just a big hunk of code. I spent

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:40:41 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK - some more detail I have found in the meantime. > > I have compiled & ran listxattr, and I can now see a difference > between a working and a broken file: > > me at dc2:~/download $ > sudo ./listxattr /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ >

Hello All, When i run lsyncd using *lsyncd -rsync /home/abc/source /home/abc/dest*then i am able to sync the two directories of the local system. But when i run using *lsyncd -rsync /home/abc/source 10.5.1.12:/home/abc/dest* where 10.5.1.12 is the ip address of the local machine then i am unable to sync the both directories on the local machine. Please leave your suggestions. Thank you, --

Hey, http://zfsonlinux.org/epel.html If you have a little time and resource please install and report back any problems you see. A filesystem or Volume sits within a zpool a zpool is made up of vdevs vdevs are made up of block devices. zpool is similar to LVM volume vdev is similar to raid set devices can be files. Thanks, Andrew

I am the author of BackupPC (http://backuppc.sourceforge.net) and I am working on adding rsync support to BackupPC. I am implementing the server-side in perl, and the client will run vanilla rsync. (BTW, is there the protocol documented? I've answered all my questions by looking at the source, but it would be great to check against any docs.) I started with librsync 0.9.3 and the

I found the cvs repository at = http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/librsync/librsync/ The sourceforge project was just setup a couple of days ago. That must have = been why google could not find it yesterday. I believe the samba cvs site for librsync is now deprecated. The 0.9.5.1 version I was looking for looks to me to be a Jun. 27 cvs snapshot = from wherever cvs was at that

I'm not sure if this is the appropriate forum for questions regarding librsync, but couldn't find any others. I'm trying to get librsync working properly on Solaris 2.7 and 2.8 Sparc servers. The problem is that while librsync appears to compile cleanly, "make check" fails the sources.test. Does anyone have any insight as to why this might be? Might I need a specific

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for > > case 1), 3), and 4). > > Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably > something stronger than md4 like SHA-1. md4 is probably good enough for most