similar to: [Bug 12498] New: --fuzzy --fuzzy hugely impacts performance even if its' not needed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12489 Bug ID: 12489 Summary: --fuzzy --fuzzy does not work with daemon Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 Bug ID: 12527 Summary: Sender waits for timeout when fuzzy basis file found Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13445 Bug ID: 13445 Summary: Fuzzy searching in link-dest tries to open regular file as directory Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866 Bug ID: 11866 Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12530 Bug ID: 12530 Summary: [REQ] Improve fuzzy using files being uploaded Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12838 Bug ID: 12838 Summary: [PATCH] Log sent/received bytes even in case of error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12522 Bug ID: 12522 Summary: [PATCH] Send last error messages to sender Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file, and uses it as a basis file. Whereas --detect-renamed looks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13083 Bug ID: 13083 Summary: [PATCH] Use both partial file + basis file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12817 Bug ID: 12817 Summary: [PATCH] Allow daemon itself to chroot Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 Bug ID: 12525 Summary: [PATCH] Avoid uploading whole file when transfer fails Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 Bug ID: 13071 Summary: [PATCH] Allow --partial-dir with --inplace Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13082 Bug ID: 13082 Summary: [REQ] Hardware / SSE based MD5 operations Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Am 09.02.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Ben RUBSON: >> On 09 Feb 2017, at 10:05, Thomas Güttler <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we have a huge directory tree. >> >> >> * 17M files (number of files) >> * 2.2TBytes of data. >> * Only 0.1% changes per day >> >> Current pain: rsyncs directory tree traversal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12519 Bug ID: 12519 Summary: Failed to open lock file, add reason Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

no backup - no mercy ----- On Mar 14, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Ben RUBSON ben.rubson at gmail.com wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> I would now expect a rsync from the snap would transfer just some megay >> bytes to the file from the day before. >> But it doesn't: >> >> ha-idg-1:/cluster/guests/servers_alive # time rsync -av --stats

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 Bug ID: 12819 Summary: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10338 Summary: Start deletion from the top of the hierarchy Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ben.rubson at

--no-whole-file would only make it even worse. It would have to read the remote file over the network in order to do the diff then it would write the whole file over the network anyway (--inplace would help a little). Local copies force --whole-file for a good reason. On 03/14/2018 10:05 AM, Ben RUBSON via rsync wrote: > On 14 Mar 2018, Lentes, Bernd via rsync wrote: > >> ----- On

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13268 Bug ID: 13268 Summary: [WARN] shifting a negative signed value is undefined Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org