similar to: Inconsistent behavior using 3.1.2 from macOS 10.12.2 to an AFP mount

Assuming you are aware Apple 10.12.1/2 did a number on crypto, broke SSH, HTTPS to "legacy" servers. R/ Everett Batey / Skype: wa6cre-10 / efbatey at gmail.com Please visit So Calif Linux Expo http://www.socallinuxexpo.org On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Steven Kilby <stevenkilby2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy

Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.2(acl) and kernel 2.4.24+acl, libacl-2.2.23. Following problem: When I create a file in an directory with extended ACLs, samba applies the "create mask" in a wrong way (IMHO). The normal behaviour of tools like chmod is that the second (middle) permission field is mapped to the "mask" ACE if the file has an extended ACL, so that the change

Hi all, we got a new test system here and I just also tested btrfs raid6 on that. Write performance is slightly lower than hw-raid (LSI megasas) and md-raid6, but it probably would be much better than any of these two, if it wouldn''t read all the during the writes. Is this a known issue? This is with linux-3.9.2. Thanks, Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Jan, since i can not cc you mail address when filing a bug on oss bugzilla,just paste the bug description here. Testing env, Kernel version:latest linus's mainline 2.6.27 Testing Nodes:test5/6 Description: Jan,i used your provided quota tools,now it works for me:),currently,i'm doing a sanity check for the quota on ocfs2. Found a strange thing when comparing with the ext3,the quota

Hello group, I have an OSX 10.3.9 Server that I'm trying to back up with rsync 3.0.2. Since I didn't have any luck with the 10.3.9 patch and I do have 10.4 clients, I decided to try running the backup over AFP (Apple's file sharing protocol). I found a way to mount the AFP volume with root permissions and rsync 3.0.2 works very nicely using this on the 10.4 clients, preserving

Dear r-helpers, I am looking for an R-equivalent for the eval-function in javascript which can interpret a string as code on runtime, thereby allowing things like for (i in c(1:2)) { eval(items + "i") <- read.csv(eval(filename+ i), dec=","); } which would execute (with filename="testfile"): items1 <- read.csv(testfile1, dec=","); items2 <-

mainly question for the intel folks, any chance to rerun the ltp testsuites to see how we are doing these days with all the changes ? thanks :) Wim

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've compiled rsync 3.0.3 on OSX 10.4 PPC via the plain jane ./configure; make method (no patches). The resulting binary has then been moved to /usr/local/bin/rsync3 and copied to a OSX 10.5.4 Intel client machine as rsync3. I then run the following command: rsync3 -vvv -e ssh -avAX --progress --delete -

I''m seeing some pretty pitiful performance using ZFS on a NFS server, with a ZFS volume exported (only with rw=host.foo.com,root=host.foo.com opts) and mounted on a Linux host running kernel 2.4.31. This linux kernel I''m working with is limited in that I can only do NFSv2 mounts... irregardless of that aspect, I''m sure something''s amiss. I mounted the zfs-based

Hello, In summary, i appear to have encountered a bug when attempting to restore files using rsync 3.0.0pre4 (matt) with stored ACLs (via --fake-super). The ACL information appears to be correctly stored as xattrs on the backup server; however, when i attempt to restore while preserving the ACL data, i get the following error: ERROR: out of memory in get_xattr_data [sender] Questions: 1. Is

Hello I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Here is an example: GlusterFUSE mount: # cd /mnt/glusterfs # rm -f testfile1 ; dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile1 bs=1G count=1 1+0 records

I realize batch mode is still experimental, but I was hoping there might be a workaround for a problem I am getting. I have been trying to run some tests and I get the below error when I use the --read-batch option to. I can successfully create an initial set of batch files, then a second set based upon a few modified test files from the first batch. When I first run the --read-batch option

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

Hi Xavi At this time I'm using 'plain' bricks with XFS. I'll be moving to LVM cached bricks. There is no RAID for data bricks, but I'll be using hardware RAID10 for SSD cache disks (I can use 'writeback' cache in this case). 'small file performance' is the main reason I'm looking at different options, i.e. using formated sparse files. I spent considerable

I have a simple program that read all HTML files from a directory and returns parts of the content and the file names which are HREFs to those file. I build the HREF string dynamicaly as PATH_TO_DOC_ROOT + "file_name". My PATH_TO_DOC_ROOT = http://127.0.0.1:3000/docman/public/docs. So, the final link that I am interested in might look like this:

I have not found support in libvirt (nor virsh) for doing the equivalent of "qemu-img rebase ....". The use case: You have copied a qcow2 stack and the new files have different names or reside in a different directory. Therefore you need to change the backing file. Is there a way to do this? Is this a planned addition to libvirt? Harald -------------- next part

Hi Dmitri, On 22/09/17 17:07, Dmitri Chebotarov wrote: > > Hello > > I'm running some tests to compare performance between Gluster FUSE mount > and formated sparse files (located on the same Gluster FUSE mount). > > The Gluster volume is EC (same for both tests). > > I'm seeing HUGE difference and trying to figure out why. Could you explain what hardware

First - many, many congrats to team ZFS. Developing/writing a new Unix fs is a very non-trivial exercise with zero tolerance for developer bugs. I just loaded build 27a on a w1100z with a single AMD 150 CPU (2Gb RAM) and a single (for now) SCSI disk drive: FUJITSU MAP3367NP (Revision: 0108) hooked up to the built-in SCSI controller (the only device on the SCSI bus). My initial ZFS test was to

Hello, Can someone explain why my exclude option is not excluding filles as instructed in my script below. I have tried multiple methods and still have been unsuccessful in excluding the one file "test.sql". The methods I have tried are: 1. Removing EXTRAFLAG variable -a 2. Removing using -a 3. Option --include infront of --exclude and behind of --exclude. 4. rsync /software/testdir/

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the