Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send"
2007 Jul 11
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
boris@folgmann.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |boris@folgmann.de
------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST -------
I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated
2017 Jan 22
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> ---
Hi,
I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then
re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing
sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential
matches. I would have preferred to use a
2005 Feb 11
2
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 -------
I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer
unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which
is really annoying).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You
2015 Jan 03
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #22 from elatllat at gmail.com ---
Wow 10 years.
Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options.
For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the
iteration of this bug, here is how it works:
1) Create 2 lists of files; destination and source with the files sizes and
path
2) For each file
2014 Mar 02
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC ---
I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master
I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches?
Anyway, in a simple test, using
2005 Feb 01
0
[Bug 2294] New: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of
delete/re-send
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 Nov 30
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is
> incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz ->
> httpd.11.gz).
Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement
> request myself, I found everything
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
> myself, I found
2016 Mar 06
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My
version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers'
services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems
(i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place
to
2024 Apr 03
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea at zulu.ro> ---
The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various
snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they
are very different technologies used for different purposes.
rsync is used commonly to synchronise at the *file level* between
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #39 from andy <andy at digitalsignalperson.com> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for
when ZFS fails. Many consider zfs/btrfs/snapshots as "not a backup".
2011 Jan 29
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST -------
Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use
case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file
name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often
quite large files (0.2 to
2016 Apr 21
5
[Bug 11866] New: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866
Bug ID: 11866
Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double
fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2017 Jan 05
3
[Bug 12498] New: --fuzzy --fuzzy hugely impacts performance even if its' not needed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12498
Bug ID: 12498
Summary: --fuzzy --fuzzy hugely impacts performance even if
its' not needed
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
2016 Dec 30
1
[Bug 12489] New: --fuzzy --fuzzy does not work with daemon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12489
Bug ID: 12489
Summary: --fuzzy --fuzzy does not work with daemon
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter:
2006 Mar 01
1
detect-renamed dosn't work?!
Hi lhere,
i'm trying the detect-renamed patch in 2.6.7pre2 in a really small
scenario. Having two dirs with some files rsyncing to destination.
First I have no delete switches on, at least I will need them.
Heres the command I use:
rsync -e "ssh -i /root/.ssh/srv-key" -r -p -o -g -v -z -l -t
--detect-renamed --stats /root/test/ srv:/root/test --progress (--fuzzy)
When I
2013 Jan 29
0
detect-renamed questions
Hello,
I was looking for "detect renamed" feature in rsync
(https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294) so used rsync-3.0.9
with patches detect-renamed.diff and detect-renamed-lax.diff.
I have 2 questions, not sure if I'm missing something (options) or if
it is working as intended and could be improved.
1) It does not detect a rename when a file is moved into another
2018 May 18
9
[Bug 13445] New: Fuzzy searching in link-dest tries to open regular file as directory
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13445
Bug ID: 13445
Summary: Fuzzy searching in link-dest tries to open regular
file as directory
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core