similar to: Feature request: Closing destination files in a separate thread

Hi, I have huge data on my destination system (>5 TB, > 400,000 files, nested folderss) and i am trying to publish new files from our shared location to destination system. I am looking forward to use rsync but want it to just push new/updated files uploaded on shared server to destination. I don't intent to keep all data to remain in sync on source server and want to delete the source

Hello, I'm currently using rsync to backup up to 1 TB of small files of relatively small files (hundreds of Ko mostly) My backup strategy is to use a full backup and then backup the diff every day using hardlink with the previous backup. This means that each time I use rsync, the destination directory is empty. Using strace, I can see that rsync call a 'lstat' command to try to

Good day to all! I'm doing git file replication task and need to sync source destination, using below sync command. rsync -atnvv --existing --exclude '.git' --progress source/ destination/; Here I, 1) need only sync directories that *exist on destination* ,no new folders should copy from source - [used --existing did the job but it not copying new files also.] 2) need to copy

Hello everyone, I have been exploring how to get the estimated binary diff size without changing the destination folder, but still have no answer. I have difficulty in solving this problem. I want to do something like: rsync -av ~/src/ user at host::module/dst/ but I do not want the dst/ to be really changed. That is to say, I only want to get the estimated binary diff size (or says delta

As a safety feature, I would like to see a feature that would prevent rsync from syncing when the sync, if it were to go ahead, would result in more than a certain number of files being deleted from the destination. A similar feature, --max-delete, does exist, but does not prevent rsync from doing a partial run when --max-delete entries would be exceeded - it simply deletes up to that amount of

Hello everybody, I've been looking for a way to use rsync with the --del option but checking the data of the file as well. What I'm after is a way to backup NAS1 to NAS2, literally copying everything, but asking rsync not to delete data on NAS2 not present on NAS1 if the source was removed less than e.g. 60 days ago. Perhaps a cross checking between the file/dir date and the system

Thanks for your inputs. Surprisingly i tried executing the following command but end up deleting ssh.exe in Cygwin folder when source folder path is incorrect or not reachable. rsync --remove-source-files -v -av -r /cygdrive/c/AmitTest/ ssh username at destinationserver:/cygdrive/e/AMIT/AmitTest/ I am wondering if remove source is doing some tricks there but unable to find root cause why ssh.exe

When run from the console, the following code works, when run through the WEBrick server I get a "You have a nil object where you didn''t expect it!" class Competition < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comp_dates, :order=>:position def initial_date comp_dates.first end def display_dates i_d = initial_date if i_d.nil? return "unknown"

Thanks for info. I was under the assumption that rsync will execute followings steps: 1. Compare first to identify different files (new/updated) --> This is where i am worried due to data size 2. Upload new/updated files 3 Remove source file As per your comment, rsync will compare after uploading to check if files are identical ? Additionally i don't expect to delete directories as i want

Hi to all rsync users. rsync's `--delete' option works fine in the following example: I'm sending all the content of /home/rodolfo from machine1 to /home/rodolfo in machine2: $ rsync --dry-run -vrtul --delete --exclude='/.*' . 192.168.0.2:/home/rodolfo , and --delete works perfectly. Instead, in this other example: $ rsync --dry-run -vrt --delete --modify-window=1 file1

I''m running the latest from svn (rev 285). I''ve been having a problem launching a process repeatedly. What happens is that I get a debug message "some read error" and then the worker refuses to run again. I''ve stripped my worker down to just doing a puts and it still happens. Like the other threads I want to launch my workers as needed, however I get the

I would like to be able to see in the logs which server a pop/imap connection is proxied to. Thank you. -- Marshal Newrock, Ideal Solution LLC http://www.idealso.com

Hi I have a "Chain" of rsyncs(*) A -> B -> C -> D My problem is that "A" is switched off after the rsync is done. So i have to copy the "batch" immediately (and manually/via other means) to "B", before switching off, so the batch can later be retrieved from "B" and copied to "C" for --read-batch. And copied further on for

Greetings. If I do this: rsync --hard-links one.server.com::"module/somedir/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386 module/someotherdir/1.0/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386" /export/distros I get: /export/distros/i386/... and a conflict between the two sources. I want for destination: /export/distros/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386 /export/distros/1.0/images/redhat/3.0WS/en/os/i386 In other

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 Bug ID: 2602 Summary: (Feature request) Verify host using key in destination user account Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hi! I've installed FreeBSD5 (i386). I've synced src tree via cvsup (RELENG_5) and tried to build world. But in the process I got the following error: /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/i386/des-586.s:2363:33: warning: null character(s) ignored {standard input}:2367: Error: invalid character '=' in operand 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto. *** Error code 1

Hi, I am setting up a xen 3 enviroment that has a file backend and 2 application servers with live emegration between the 2 application servers. --------- --------- | app 1 | | app 2 | --------- --------- \ / \ / \ / ---------------- | file backend | ---------------- I am planing on using lustre clustre file system on the file backend. Are there

I'm forwarding this to security@, as I'm getting no replies on ipfw@. Hope it's relevant enough for you :( ---Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Erik Paulsen Skålerud Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:02 AM To: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Question about logging. Sorry for asking this, It's probably been

Hi! cc'd to freebsd-security@ as somebody there may correct me, cc'd to secteam@ as maintaner of security/portaudit. On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:14:21 +0930 Ian Moore wrote: > I've just updated my acroread port to 7.0.1 & was surprised when portaudit > still listed it as a vulnerability. I think it is portaudit problem. > According to

Greetings. Currently, the --one-file-system applies to both the source and destination and this is a problem. In my source, I have a symlink pointing to a directory on another device which I would like to have copied. I thus use --copy-unsafe-links. I also use --delete. This is dangerous because if there is a bug in my script, I would not like the destination to become suddenly