similar to: O_NOATIME ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "O_NOATIME ?"

2010 Mar 14
17
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7249] New: Add an option to use O_NOATIME
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249 Summary: Add an option to use O_NOATIME Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nicolas.george at normalesup.org
2016 Oct 26
0
O_NOATIME ?
On Wed 26 Oct 2016, devzero at web.de wrote: > > since we are using rsync for backing up millions of files in a virtual environment, and most of the virtual machines run on SSD cached storage, i`d be curious how that negatively impacts lifetime of the SSD`s when we do rsync run every night for backup > > my question: > does rsync normal file comparison run to determine if anything
2006 Jan 24
1
propagate atimes with rsync-2.6.6 (fwd)
Dear Martin Pool. We regularly use rsync for making backups of our file systems but we have noticed that the atimes are not transferred with the files and are also always updated on the sender's side. Therefore, we have created a modified version of rsync based on rsync-2.6.6 protocol version 29 which transfers the access times with the transferred files and also allows to preserve the access
2008 Aug 24
1
mtime, atime, ctime
Hello I am making backup of a Plesk Debian server to /backup using Rsync. My questioin is how can I preserve the ctime, mtime, and atime of original files? Thanks
2007 Aug 02
1
Option to not update Atime on filesystems not mounted noatime
Hi I have a single filesystem i don't mount noatime because mutt would work very good otherwise. Today, in a discussion about mkisofs, i learned that Linux since 2.6.8 supports "O_NOATIME" as an option to open. (see "man 2 open") So how comes that rsync doesn't do that and/or there is no option to switch on that behaviour? Bis denn -- Real Programmers
2007 May 08
1
rsync feature needed: preserve atime
Often we need to preserve the information atime conveys, but I have found no way to get rsync to preserve this, nor any hint it is being worked on. It would be great if 'rsync -t' also set atime not just mtime -- or maybe a new option is desired for atime. I don't know if the -X mentioned in "NEWS file from CVS" covers this: > Added the --xattrs (-X) option to preserver
2002 Oct 24
1
Using rsync for backup trashes st_atime
Hi! I've just tried to do a backup of a machine with rsync. While doing this (I was reading emails:-) I noted that mbox for mbox, I had no longe new mails, but I've never read off these mailboxes lately... This seemed to be a st_atime problem, and indeed, I could verify that. This is what I used for backup: rsync --archive \ --recursive \
2011 Sep 22
0
Iterating metadata using O_NOATIME, instead of only restoring the stat values
Hi there, At the Tracker project we use FLAC__metadata_simple_iterator_init to extract metadata from FLAC files. Although this API has a boolean that restores the stat results of the file after iteration, it's still not the same as passing O_NOATIME. Ideally we can pass a int fd instead of a filename, and doesn't the metadata iterator try to write to the fd at all. Then we can open() a
2004 Apr 20
1
improved atime patch
I posted a patch a few days ago that adds copying of atime. At that time, it was just enabled with -t/--times. After some time, we have figured out that that choice might not have been the best. Here's a new version of the patch (relative to CVS) that adds -A/--copy-atime instead. It also includes a test case. Any feedback on this patch and/or the previous one that I posted?
2003 Sep 10
1
Looking for atime reset...
I find rsync an excellent tool when I need to move multi-gigabyte filesystems, because I can do most of the copying during the week - then a quick cleanup sweep in our 4 hour outage window. I do need to somehow get the atime's to copy over, because as it stands now I loose the age information (which we will soon be using for auto-archiving) on things I copy with rsync. Would it be that hard
2013 Feb 12
2
A --exclude-checksum option?
Hi, I use rsync with hardlinks for backup, once a week doing checksums to ensure there's no filesystem corruption in the backed-up data. I also use tmpwatch, or something similar, to clean up /tmp, it removes files that have not been accessed recently. (atime older than some configured limit). I backup /tmp because I throw stuff in tmp that I might possibly need again but don't want to
2001 Sep 01
3
Patch to make rsync preserve access times
Bradley, and the rsync development team, I came across the following message on the rsync bug tracking system, while searching for just this feature (access time preservation)... http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/incoming?id=2509;expression=atime;user=guest ... where it is written... > Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 02:59:42 -0500 > From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org> >
2006 Jan 10
1
bin/91622: /bin/cp does not update atime of the source file
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, joe wrote: >> Environment: > RELENG_4 20051028 >> Description: > [cp fails to update atime] > > this occurs regardless of whether or not the user has > rwx permissions on the source file. does not apply of > course if the source filesystem is mounted read-only. > they are read-write here. > > since the source file is indeed being read,
2016 Mar 28
2
-H option causes unneccessary transfers
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:11:07AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > What does --itemize-changes say about these files? > > Also, what is --atimes? Is this the Apple modified rsync for OSX? > > On 03/28/2016 07:51 AM, Albert Berger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > when the daily system backup with rsync is
2009 Nov 19
1
SET_PATH_INFO is not working on NetApp Filer
Hi, I'm using samba-3.2.6 on linux. Using this, I'm trying to update/modify Last Access Time(atime) of a file on CIFS share(on NetApp Filer). But not able to do so. I could successfully update atimes on windows server, but NOT on NetApp Filer. Is SET_PATH_INFO supported by NetApp filer(7.2 version)? Any help is greatly appreciated. thanks, -Kishore
2008 Sep 10
3
NFS performance and 1.1.3 - what can you (unofficially) get away with?
Hi, Does anyone have experience with bending the NFS recommendations to get better performance? The question is has anyone, with Maildir and the INDEX= on NFS (i.e. dovecot.index and dovecot.index.cache, set mail_nfs_index to no. If so, was it better to turn maildir_copy_preserve_filename to on or did it help to turn if off. The other question is did you play with turning off atime updates
2008 Feb 11
5
Need ideas for project
Hey everyone, I am a final semester MCA student. I've chosen rsync as the subject of my project for my graduation. Hence I would appreciate it if someone could guide me with some ideas on how I can contribute to rsync. I will work hard to implement whatever suggestions that you can all give me. I would definitely like to know what are some of the issues concerning rsync. May be I can then
2015 Jun 24
0
LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?
On 06/24/2015 12:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > LVM snapshots make it easy to get point-in-time consistent backups, > including databases. For example, with MySQL, you can freeze and flush > all the databases, snapshot the LV, and release the freeze. Exactly. And I mention this from time to time... I'm working on infrastructure to make that more common and more consistent:
2004 Oct 08
2
Ext 2/3 overwriting remnant data & use of data blocks - security
Greetings all- I am conducting security testing on a device that uses Linux 2.4 with ext3. I am testing secure overwrite of remnant data in temporary files, but have run into a real good stumpper in the way Ext allocates data blocks. I've got 10 yrs of *NIX behind me, several with Linux, and this has really got me perplexed as I can't find any documentation explaining the subject
2017 May 02
2
Purge Trash Fileserver
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno mar, 25/04/2017 alle 09.25 -0300, Carlos A. P. Cunha via > samba ha scritto: >> Hello >> My fileserver is a samba 4.5.4, in Ubuntu 14.04, is all ok. >> My question is, >> >> Have the recycle bin enabled, and would like a way to rotate the >> files,