similar to: rsync keeps writing files over

Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you provide some insight? This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all attached to one computer. rsync -aPh --itemize-changes -n /Volumes/shuttle_05/2012_79_1_14_1__1199_Workprint /Volumes/3TB_LTO/LT003A/ sending incremental file list >f..t.......

OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret —itemize-changes? The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them, which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777. What is the flag to tell rsync to ignore the timestamps? Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 6:18 PM, "rsync on behalf of Kevin Korb" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on

Cool Thanks! Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc” The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why it wouldn’t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn’t exist for every file, just the vast majority. So, that just makes it more confusing. Yes,

Hi Steven, Yes, both file systems are the same. rsync -nri --modify-window=1 <src> <dest> Gives me the following for most files >f..T....... 2015_167_1_1__Boy_What_A_Girl_R2/2015_167_1_1__Boy_What_A_Girl__UHD_DPX_R2/ BWAG_R2_00138428.dpx Although a few have >f..T......n 2015_167_1_1__Boy_What_A_Girl_R2/2015_167_1_1__Boy_What_A_Girl__UHD_DPX_R2/ BWAG_R2_00135909.dpx

It is saying the timestamp is wrong and that it is copying the file and changing the timestamp. If it does that every time then either the timestamps are changing on the source or the target isn't storing them. On 06/02/2016 06:13 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can you > provide some insight? > > This is a local

The man page has a section on what all the itemize-changes flags do. There is a --ignore-times but the result is what you have now, re-copy everything even if the timestamp matches. The best you can really do with storage that can't handle timestamps is to use --update. But if you do that you need to get rid of --partial (part of -P) or else rsync will never complete a file that was

Rsync only cares about the modification time. The ls command usually abbreviates the timestamp so it is better to use the stat command on one of the problem files to see the full thing. On 06/02/2016 06:42 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Cool Thanks! > > Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" > but do not match for "ls

the T means that the timestamp is wrong and rsync is not fixing it because you don't have --times or --archive in your command line. On 06/08/2016 08:17 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Yes, both file systems are the same. > > rsync -nri --modify-window=1 <src> <dest> > > Gives me the following for most files >f..T....... >

Hello, I am having difficulty putting a frequency table on my clipboard in R studio. I do not know what the error message is. I was thinking it might have to do with changing a setting on my clipboard but I do not know how to do this. I will copy and paste the exact command and error message: write.table(dpx,"clipboard",sep="\t") Error in file(file, ifelse(append,

Hello, I am experiencing a strange problem when writing (capturing) DPX video files to a Linux/Samba share. Basically, I'm seeing seeing a single smbd process go from 9 percent CPU utilization to 100 percent CPU utilization over the course of about 40 minutes. When smbd reaches 100 percent, the capture stops (drops frames). I have tested this with three different filesystem formats

In <D37E24FA.120D%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/09/16 at 12:17 AM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: Hi Blake, Please reply to the list. >rsync -nri --modify-window=1 <src> <dest> As others mentioned, you need need to use --times. This is needed so that we can see use output from --itemize-changes. >Gives me the following for most files

Hi, this is my first time using the nlme package, and I ran into the following puzzling problem. I estimated a mixed effects model using lme, once using groupedData, once explicitly stating the equations. I had the following outputs. All the coefficients were similar, but they're always slightly different, making me think that it's not due to numerical error. Also, what is the

Instead of the second -v (or even the first) add --itemize-changes. It will tell you why each file is being copied. If the file timestamps are not correct then perhaps the underlying storage doesn't allow arbitrary mtime changes. On 06/02/2016 05:23 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi, > > > > At my work we use rsync to move files between drives and to LTO among > other

Hi Tim, Thank you very much for quick response. What happens in my case is that mixing calls to getOrInsertFunction with linking another bit code module to the current module seems to be sometimes producing different outputs. Difference might be with the ordering of functions in the file (I¹m looking at LLVM IR representation), with numbers used for constant variables, numbers used in the ³dbg²

Hello-- There must be a better way to do this. I have a class method in my model that finds averages and does a few calculations using find_by_sql. The problem I¹m encountering is that all computed columns from MySQL come back as type string. E.g., def self.find_averages(domain_id) if @@domain_average return @@domain_average else @@domain_average =

On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:39 AM, Benedict Gaster wrote: > [bg] Consider the LLVM code: > > define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) { > entry: > %tobool = icmp eq i32 %x, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1] > br i1 %tobool, label %ifelse, label %ifthen > > ifthen: ; preds = %entry > %add = add i32 %x, 10 ; <i32> [#uses=1] > ret i32 %add > >

Which is the Kernel API (Xenbus API) that is available to do a similar action as "xenstore-chmod"?? Thx, Venkat _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 05/29/2014 11:06 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > Hi Tomek, > >> I’ve got a question about Module::getOrInsertFunction(). >> I got an impression that it is not deterministic where exactly in the bit >> code module the new function will be inserted. > Looking at the code (not exhaustively), it seems a new function will > always be added to the end of a module. > >

Hi, Comments inline. Ben On 12/08/2008 03:14, "Owen Anderson" <resistor at mac.com> wrote: >> We would like to develop a code generator using LLVM for a target language >> that does not support conditional branches and in fact only supports >> structured control flow, eg. If and while. What's the difference between an "if" and a conditional

Hi Owen, On 12/08/2008 16:52, "Owen Anderson" <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > SNIP > > > I'm still not seeing how these two are any different. You just replace the > text of "if" with "br", and add the explicit target labels. I should also > point out that, in LLVM IR, the order the blocks are laid out in is not > meaningful