similar to: User controlled i/o block size?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 You didn't say if you were networking or what features of rsync you are using but if you aren't networking and aren't doing anything fancy you are probably better off with cp -au which is essentially the same as rsync -au except faster. Anyways, smaller reads and writes are usually better handled by the OS's caches than really big

I'm just doing a local copy: rsync -avp --progress <source_dir> <dest_dir> The source and dest are on different spindles. Some of my copies are a TB or more (I just started one that is 1.5 TB). It is my assumption (possibly faulty) that rsync is more robust for handling any aborted copies that have to get restarted after the copy failed, thus my preference for rsync. 3

All, One big thing I failed to mention is I was running rsync inside a cygwin windows 8.1 setup. I moved it to a linux box and the behavior is much better. I get a nice smooth 85-90 MB/sec. That might be the max speed of the source drive. I'd still like a way to improve rsync's performance in cygwin, but I can understand it is a low priority. Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In that instance you would need to delete the incomplete file. The same would happen if you used -u on rsync but -u is cp's only method of avoiding files that are already there. On 04/12/2016 02:54 PM, Greg Freemyer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> > wrote: >> You didn't say if

Hi I have a 3 level nested while-endwhile loop in a macro that when the execution reaches endwhile, it is jumping out to the While at the caller macro. It shouldn't since the are instructions after the endwhile. -- Executing [s at macro-call-from-outside:72] EndWhile("DAHDI/i1/1234567-4a7f", "") in new stack == Channel 'DAHDI/i1/1234567-4a7f' jumping out of

I seem to be having a conceptual problem with the "While" and "EndWhile" applications. It seems that on the first cycle, even if the result of the "While" is false that the enclosed applications will get run. Is this expected? It seems to be counter-intuitive, but I don't know what the intent of the While routines is. I could of course put a

Hello, I am looking for a loop unfolding procedure implemented in LLVM that helps to transform a while-loop to n-layer If-statements. The transformation should be on IR, although the example below is illustrated on the source level. original loop: * WHILE (condition) DO action ENDWHILE* Expected unfolded loop (2-layer): * IF (condition) THEN* * action* * IF

Hello, I'd like to translate de code below, write in octave, to R. I'm learning to operate R a few time ago, and an example of translation will be useful for me. This code is my lectures in an undergraduate course of statistical computing. echo off; k=0; while (k<>1) n = input('a prime: '); D = 2; r = n - D * floor((n/D)); while((D <= sqrt(n) & (r <>

Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> writes: > Yep, llvm_map_components_to_libraries gets confused by the existence of > both gtest and gtest_main and enters an infinite loop. A workaround is > to not pass "all" to llvm_map_components_to_libraries but a list of > required components. This patch *seems* to fix the problem (cmake regexps are not thoroughly documented):

Hello dear list. I am currently working on a Automatic attendant, and the core things work, but I think the loop function isn't working as expected. I am testing this environment: a sip internal call from 301 to 501. The setup here is when 301 calls 501, and 301 doesn't enter an extension, it will go in loop, 3 times, and then hangup...Can't get that working. Could someone please

I have a few commands I wish to run after a hangup. It looks like only the first 2 commands are run after hangup. I am using 1.4.3 How can I get the entire loop to run 10 times. ( I know my example just has noop's but its an example). exten => h,1,Set(i=1) exten => h,n,While($[${i} < 10]) exten => h,n,Noop(jerry) exten => h,n,Set(i=$[${i} + 1]) exten => h,n,EndWhile exten

Hi, How can I park a call from dialplan and get going?? Example: 1. Answer 2. While follow = false 3. ParkCall 4. Checksomthing ? follow = true 5. Endwhile 6. UnParkCall 7. Go on .. The idea is let the call waiting while I do some things on the dialplan, is it possible?? Maybe is not parking the solution?? Thanks

Hello I haven't found an example on how to compare the value of a string variable with spaces in it, and the While loop below never exits: ========== extensions.conf exten => start,n,Set(MYVAR="Dummy value") exten => start,n,NoOp(${MYVAR}) ;BAD TOO ;exten => start,n,While(!$[${MYVAR} : "Some string"]) exten => start,n,While($[${MYVAR} != "Some

I have the following senerio. Call file calls 1st party. When connected give called party option to connect to second party. Issue Dial to second party. Caller answers and the two are bridged together. My issue is that 4 out of 5 calls fail to bridge the audio. Am I missing something or is there some kind of bug? Here is my test dialplan ;Dialer Base Code Files. ;Variables

I have a small intranet app with only 20 or so users. I''m currently using lighttpd w/ssl for production and mongrel for dev. I don''t think Mongrel supports ssl, but what is the easiest front-end to put in front of it? Pound? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century

All, I have a small Intranet app I''m trying to get ready for remote access. (I only have 15 or so users for now and I don''t plan to be adding very many more.). I have installed the login engine and it seems to be working as advertized. (Great job!) For my needs I don''t want random people to be able to register and get access to my app, but I will need to register

Hello I'm trying to use ChanIsAvail() to check when the landline is back to idle after a call, but for some reason, Asterisk doesn't detect that the callee has hung up after listening to MoH for a few seconds: ========== extensions.conf ;Play MoH for a few seconds, hang up, and ;check ChanIsAvail() able to detect when line idle again exten => 8888,1,Answer() exten =>

I''m really lost on this issue. Do I need to reinstall rails / gems? The rest of my rails setup seems to be working. I just can''t run dispatch.fcgi. (Details in original message below). I have no idea how to troubleshoot this. I''m not even positive it is supposed to be runnable from the command line. I found a troubleshooting guide that implied it was supposed to

I''ve finally gotten lighttpd working for my production instance (SUSE 10.0 with SSL). (Had to install the fcgi dev toolkit, the SUSE 10 ruby-fcgi rpm, and the fcgi gem. I''m not positive all 3 were required, but that is what I did.) Now the devel instance of my app is broken. I''m not sure how to fix it. Previously I was using WEBrick for both devel and production.

All, My initial list is rather busy. I would like to shorten the created_on and updated_on fields to just display the date, not the time. Best wold be a simple 12/28/05 type of presentation. I''ve found the format helpers in rdoc. (ie. distance_of_time_in_words_to_now ), but none seem to be what I''m looking for. How do I control the date format of a timestamp field? Thanks