similar to: Patch for tunnel script

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Patch for tunnel script"

2005 May 20
1
Shorewall 2.2.5
This will be my last 2.2 release. It contains a couple of small bug fixes that I had laying around. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.5 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.5 1) Previously, if PKTTYPE=No in shorewall.conf then pkttype match would still be used if the kernel supported it. 2) A typo in the ''tunnel'' script has been corrected
2012 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
Hi Chris and John, You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Patrik Hägglund H Sent: den 28 november 2012 22:19 To: Tobias Grosser Cc:
2005 May 15
1
Shorewall 2.3.1
This is the latest development release and may be found at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.3/shorewall-2.3.1 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.3/shorewall-2.3.1 This release changes the way that SAVE_IPSETS=Yes works to try to make it harder to shoot yourself in the foot. Read the release notes carefully. In addition, there are two problems corrected: 1) A typo in the
2012 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
> @Patrik: would you mind to check if you are subscribed with your ericsson email address? As far as I can see, I'm subscribed to llvm-commits with the same email address used in commits (I get buildbot failure emails to the same mail account as llvm-commits messages). (BTW, why should my subscription status to llvm-commits matter?) > It would be nice to see your commit mails. Yes,
2012 Oct 19
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [cfe-commits] [PATCH] [llvm+clang] memset for non-8-bit bytes
> I'm a bit confused by this concept. For the term byte, I use the "archaic" definition in the C (and C++) standard (section 3.6): addressable unit of data storage large enough to hold any member of the basic character set of the execution environment /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen [mailto:stoklund at 2pi.dk] Sent: den 19 oktober
2013 Jun 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] gcc-4.8.1 -flto, error for visibility of LLVMX86CompilationCallback2?
Thanks, now it links. If nobody objects, I will commit the following patch: diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp index 44d8cce..8acc220 100644 --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp @@ -339,6 +339,8 @@ extern "C" { /// must locate the start of the stub or call site and pass it into the JIT /// compiler function.
2012 Oct 19
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] [PATCH] [llvm+clang] memset for non-8-bit bytes
> Please start a thread on llvmdev about this functionality, and outline what other intrinsics will have to change to add non-8-bit byte support. Well, memset is the only we have seen so far (our back-end is ~50% finished for an initial release). We have our own front-end as well (we are currently not using the clang front-end), and currently don't use many llvm intrinsics (only
2003 Jul 04
1
Is it sombody who has a working pam.conf for Solaris 9 ?
Hi, I am trying to setup PAM for telnet on my solaris 9 box and the pam_winbind grant me access but I recieve a acount failure: Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 pam_winbind[9688]: user 'patrikg' granted acces Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 login[9688]: login account failure: Permission denied The values in pam.conf for winbind is: login auth required /usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so other
2007 Dec 12
3
Measure of agreement??
Dear List, Please put me on the right track. I have been searching for the R functions for measures of agreement. Where should I look? Patrik Öhagen Läkemedelsverket Box 26 751 03 Uppsala Tel. +46(0)18-174924 patrik.ohagen@mpa.se [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
On 29.11.2012, at 15:53, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Chris and John, > > You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? My guess: the mailer may have issues with the non-ascii character "ä" in your name. See also
2012 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
On Nov 29, 2012, at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29.11.2012, at 15:53, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chris and John, >> >> You are listed as administrators for llvm-commits. Can you provide some help in this issue: that my LLVM svn commit messages do not reach llvm-commits? >
2012 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [cfe-commits] [PATCH] [llvm+clang] memset for non-8-bit bytes
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: >> I'm a bit confused by this concept. > > For the term byte, I use the "archaic" definition in the C (and C++) standard (section 3.6): > > addressable unit of data storage large enough to hold any member of the basic character > set of the execution environment
2012 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [cfe-commits] [PATCH] [llvm+clang] memset for non-8-bit bytes
On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: >> non-8-bit byte I'm a bit confused by this concept. I'm aware of the archaic meaning of the word byte, but it has meant 8 bits for the last 30 years. There's even an ISO/IEC standard. I know of architectures like Texas' C55x DSPs that address 16 bits at a time, but even their
2017 Jan 10
3
Porting LLVM to OpenVMS
Dear community, My company is interested in porting LLVM to OpenVMS. To do so, we need to look at extending the AMD64 calling convention to suit the existing calling conventions available on OpenVMS. We realize LLVM is a big and complex project and for some people who has not worked on it before, it's going to be a big and tough job that is going to take a lot of time. Still, the job has to
2003 Jun 24
2
Samba3-beta1 as a PDC and using tdbsam as passdb backend it takes the home-directory info from /etc/passwd
I didn't get any answers so I try again: I am using tdbsam as passdb backand. I have added root user with pdbedit. The machine trust account was added on the fly. I have added the user with pdbedit. I have created the user in /etc/passwd. When the user logs in from a W2k and mounts the home-directory I noticed that Samba didn't take the home-directory information from tdbsam, it
2012 Nov 28
3
[LLVMdev] Lost commit mails
On 11/28/2012 03:47 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 28 nov. 2012 à 15:07, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I just realized non of Patrik's commit mails has every reached llvm-commits. Neither my own archive nor the web interface contains commit messages for any of his commits. The relevant commits are >> >> 168785,
2002 Aug 30
4
Enhancement of wbinfo in samba2.2.6pre2
Hi, Most of the samba-commands takes a option for smb.conf file exept for wbinfo. It should be nice to have that functionallity in wbinfo also. /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant patrik.gustavsson@sun.com Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.sweden Mobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS
2012 Oct 19
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [cfe-commits] [PATCH] [llvm+clang] memset for non-8-bit bytes
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Patrik Hägglund H <patrik.h.hagglund at ericsson.com> wrote: > >>> non-8-bit byte > > I'm a bit confused by this concept. I'm aware of the archaic meaning of the word byte, but it has meant 8 bits for the last 30 years. There's even an
2013 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] gcc-4.8.1 -flto, error for visibility of LLVMX86CompilationCallback2?
Hi Patrik, On 12/06/13 09:48, Patrik Hägglund H wrote: > Thanks, now it links. > > If nobody objects, I will commit the following patch: > > diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp > index 44d8cce..8acc220 100644 > --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp > +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86JITInfo.cpp > @@ -339,6 +339,8 @@ extern "C" {
2013 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply?
I would also like so tee support for __builtin_apply*. We use it in macros and such. If others are interested, please speak up. -Jan On 02/10/2013 20:51, Patrik Hägglund H wrote: > Indeed. However, I wouldn't have called variable number of arguments a "sophisticated feature". :-) > > /Patrik Hägglund > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at