similar to: [Bug 11803] New: rsync protocol (selection/compatibility) problem

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 Summary: Rsync fails with older version. Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: r.e.wolff at bitwizard.nl

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:29:49 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 >>> KT Walrus

On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:29:49 -0400 KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > > > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at

> On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 > KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > >>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) >>> Joseph

you could try setting protocols = in config file to disable (most) listeners. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> Date: 03/11/2017 19:39 (GMT+02:00) To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Subject: Re: dovecot-lda without starting dovecot? On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 19:30:22 +0200 Sami Ketola

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:37:11 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2017, at 12.55, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: Sorry to say this setup works flawlessly for years. The only > > addition we will make now is to do the delivery with dovecot-lda. > > Everything else (including multiple dovecot pop/imap

On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:53:47 +0200 (EET) Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On November 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM Stephan von Krawczynski > > <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical > > hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage.

On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 10:44:25 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 4 Nov 2017, at 10.31, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 > > Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > >> Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:05:46 +0200 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On 20 Nov 2017, at 10.50, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > AFAIK no complex director stuff would be needed then, right? > > The second sentence implies that using file locking should also be enough, > > which dovecot does. >

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process > > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and everything worked > > pretty well. We had no problems

On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > wrote: > > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > > would implement a new param for

Hi there, I just tried a couple of ftp mirrors to grab the latest OpenSSH. ftp://ftp.solnet.ch/mirror/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/ replies with a 550 and ftp://ftp.dragonbsd.swiss-anime.ch/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/ doesn't seem to have been updated since May. They were the first two I tried. Why me??? :) 73, Ged.

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:19:23 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 9.15, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:19:12 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > > > >> mail_location Optionally disable indexes using :INDEX=MEMORY > >>

On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 21:39:18 -0400 KT Walrus <kevin at my.walr.us> wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:24:39 -0700 (PDT) > > Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Michael Felt <michael at felt.demon.nl> writes: >

> On November 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical hosts. > They share the mail data via an external storage. > Now we would like to use dovecot-lda on the smtp host, so we wonder if the > lda binary works without starting dovecot from

> On 3 Nov 2017, at 18.23, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > Hello Aki, > > let me explain this a bit more. We do not intend to use only some copied > binary. Of course we would do a full installation of dovecot and pidgeonhole, > only we question if it is necessary to start the dovecot init-file bringing up > the dovecot

> On 4 Nov 2017, at 10.31, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 01:57:31 +0200 > Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi> wrote: >> Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the locking >> problems and multi-access problems that come with setup like that? What is >> the actual problem that you

> On 5 Nov 2017, at 12.55, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > Sorry to say this setup works flawlessly for years. The only addition we > will make now is to do the delivery with dovecot-lda. Everything else > (including multiple dovecot pop/imap servers) will stay as is. > Hopefully dovecot-lda does not fiddle around with the indexes too much, as we >

On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be disabled we > would implement a new param for switching that off. ????????????????????????? Dovecot's indexing is one of its main features, and WHY it is so

On 07/11/2017 09:18, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:50:16 -0500 > Tanstaafl <tanstaafl at libertytrek.org> wrote: > > On 11/6/2017, 4:01:19 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> > wrote: Still we are not content with it touching/locking dovecot.index.log. If > someone pointed at one location in the code where this could be