similar to: [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers' services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> --- On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000 samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 > > --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com --- > Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement > request myself, I found everything

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #39 from andy <andy at digitalsignalperson.com> --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for when ZFS fails. Many consider zfs/btrfs/snapshots as "not a backup".

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 ------- I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which is really annoying). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 boris@folgmann.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boris@folgmann.de ------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST ------- I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 Summary: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is > incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz -> > httpd.11.gz). Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC --- I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches? Anyway, in a simple test, using

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> --- ### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ? If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file, and uses it as a basis file. Whereas --detect-renamed looks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> --- Hi, I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential matches. I would have preferred to use a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> --- > This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync. sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems (i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea at zulu.ro> --- The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they are very different technologies used for different purposes. rsync is used commonly to synchronise at the *file level* between

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #22 from elatllat at gmail.com --- Wow 10 years. Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options. For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the iteration of this bug, here is how it works: 1) Create 2 lists of files; destination and source with the files sizes and path 2) For each file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 ------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST ------- Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often quite large files (0.2 to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11635 Bug ID: 11635 Summary: make fails for out-of-tree build Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: andrey.gursky

On Wed 20 Jan 2016, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > I was just about to implement the same, since nanoseconds are taken > into account when transferring, thus making it obvious not to ignore Really? I thought the protocol only transmits seconds. Paul

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11588 Bug ID: 11588 Summary: missing option: preallocate for all files except for sparse Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi Andrey, 2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua>: ... > If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a > big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very > different in opposite to BSD or public domain. Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit against my project would be pretty small if I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1804 dajoker at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dajoker at gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the

I've had NO success with apps which are installed through the browser (IE6). Example: Acrobat, Flash What's the right approach to such installs? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ L.W.(Les) Dunaway Ninety-nine percent of the failures come from people who have the habit of making excuses. George Washington Carver, 1864-1943, American Botanist