similar to: Can I help move bug 11521 along?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521 Bug ID: 11521 Summary: rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to determine file differences Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with

I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite

Another option might be g95 instead of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/06, Chris

Hi, the idea of a dragon theme reminded me of the dragon-like serpents called "Nāga" from Cambodian mythology, among other places. Here's a brief link explaining the specific Cambodian meaning - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naga_(mythology)#N.C4.81gas_in_Cambodia I like this as a name, because it's unique short and easy to type and remember (as long as you omit the accent,

The PV superpage mapping feature has been in the hypervisor for a while now, but I''m not away of any use of this feature by an upstream guest kernel (e.g., and primarily of interest, pv_ops Linux). Am I mistaken, or is anyone looking into or interested in this? If the feature is unused we should remove it from the hypervisor in this development cycle, as it''s untested and is

On 9/1/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them > > like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to > > the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so > > let me know any rules I

I have the winbind login working on FC5 but now logins to local accounts cannot authenticate. My config files are here: http://www.pigeonnier.org/nsswitch.conf http://www.pigeonnier.org/pam.d/ http://www.pigeonnier.org/krb.conf Again, if I try to ssh in as a user that exists only as a local account on the remote host, I am rejected. User msh is -not- a AD account and only exists on the FC5

Hi, I'm having some problems cross-compiling from ppc (OS X) to x86 object files and to ia64, at all. I'd appreciate some advice as to whether or not I'm actually supposed to be able to do this, and what's wrong if so. Here's how I configured it: ../llvm-darcslocal/llvm/configure --with-llvmgccdir=$LLVMGCCDIR --prefix=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/install The results work fine

This patch enables support of hugepages in a pv Xen environment. It is against the latest xen unstable tree on http://xenbits.xensource.com. The patch assumes the guest is passing a physically aligned hugepage. It does reference counting on all the underlying pages. Dave McCracken Oracle Corp. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

Here is a set of small patches that enables hugetlb on PV machines. They are against xen-unstable and linux-2.6.18-xen. The patches are specifically for x86_64. I originally had these patches working back in May, but recently for some reason my machine now refuses to boot the baseline xen-unstable, so I''ve been unable to verify them. However, they should still work. Comments, bug

On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > You wrote: > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > >> all, > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1?

On 3/21/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > > Hi, I'm trying to access an analysis pass from the Inliner pass, and > > I'm having a lot of trouble getting that to work - I can verify that > > my pass is loaded and run (it is a dynamically loaded pass that is > > part of an analysisgroup),

On 9/6/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: [snip] > > ../../src/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:3871: failed assertion > > `(TREE_CONSTANT(exp) || TREE_CODE(exp) == STRING_CST) && "Isn't a > > constant!"' > > > > In this case, TreeConstantToLLVM::Convert() is getting a constant to >

Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily tried it. I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that it would require a "complete rewrite of the gfortran backend" [1]. Now, I probably misinterpreted

On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > You wrote: > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > >> all, > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

Hi - I wanted to make a pass available for use with llc, and found that even though there is a PassInfo::LLC value, it isn't currently used. If you compare analyze.cpp and opt.cpp to llc.cpp, the first two find appropriate pass names with a FilteredPassNameParser and create them, but llc does not - it just gets all the passes it wants through the TargetMachine. Is there a particular reason

Hi, I have a large-ish application I'm trying to build with LLVM, so I replaced g++ in the Makefiles with llvm-g++. This appears to work fine when I pass -Wl,-native to generate an ELF executable, but I want to control the inlining threshold it uses, so I am now passing -Wl,-disable-inlining and -Wa,-disable-inlining, and having it generate LLVM bytecode, then running opt -inlining to generate

Hi, I'm using LLVM as part of my thesis project and wanted to let the community know about it. (And get your feedback :) The project is called LENS. It's a file format and a framework for storing generic information about a program based on the control structure of the program, and quickly building tools to interact with that data. It might be best to think of the format as an external