similar to: [Bug 11513] New: Modified rrsync to support write-only usage

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6020 Summary: support/rrsync fails when server-side options include "- e." Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

rrsync used to throw the error /usr/local/bin/rrsync: invalid rsync-command syntax or options when run under BackupPC 3.2.1, with this patch full and incremental backups work. --- support/rrsync | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/support/rrsync b/support/rrsync index 6f83f9d..c231ea3 100644 --- a/support/rrsync +++ b/support/rrsync @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ our

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11879 Bug ID: 11879 Summary: escape rrsync restricted folder Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Hi all, is it possible to get rrsync with the "--delete" option working? Or is the rsync server really started unidirectional in this special scenario? Regards. JS -- GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3570 Bug ID: 3570 Summary: Add substitution token for explicitly selected IdentityFile for ControlPath selection Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.3p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Hi R users, I am trying to use the optim function to maximize a likelihood funciton, and I got the following warning messages. Could anyone explain to me what messege 31 means exactly? Is it a cause for concern? Since the value of convergence turns out to be zero, it means that the converging is successful, right? So can I assume that the parameter estimates generated thereafter are reliable MLE

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10181 Summary: --stats bug Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: RutleCorps at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at

Hi, im having this on my screen and dmesg im not sure if this is an error message. btw im using centos 4.4 with 2 x 200GB PATA drives. md: md0: sync done. RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:2 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:hda2 disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:hdc2 md: delaying resync of md5 until md3 has finished resync (they share one or more physical units) md: syncing RAID array md5 md: minimum _guaranteed_

Hi, there I am a grad student struggling to get my syntax right in a model I am building in R. I am trying to specify a variable,W, in a loop, such that on the first iteration, it is equal to Wo, my starting value, which I have already specified with Wo<-9.2 On any other iteration other than the first, I want W to equal the previous value of W in the iteration. plus an increment from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13492 Bug ID: 13492 Summary: report modified dir when using iconv Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Hi List, What this means? md: syncing RAID array md0 md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc. md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for reconstruction. md: using 128k window, over a total of 2096384 blocks. md: md0: sync done. RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:2 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda2 disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb2 sd 0:0:0:0:

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found

I must be missing something obvious here: According to the help page for read.spss, the reencode option is only active when R is run under a UTF-8 locale. read.spss can only import the SPSS file when run under a iso88591(5) locale, under a UTF-8 locale I get: Error in read.spss("wo.sav") : error reading system-file header In addition: Warning message: In read.spss("wo.sav")

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12576 Bug ID: 12576 Summary: popt aliases allow users to bypass sudo argument restrictions Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hi, LLVM dev team: Thanks for your suggestion, I have done the experiment to compare the two pointer analysis(Andersen and Steensgaard) methods in LLVM, but the result was unexpected. In each test, I compare these two methods using same optimization; There are several tests, each with a different optimization. The benchmark is all the 11 C programs in CINT2000 of SPEC. In all the tests, I found

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8565 Summary: rsync hangs when using --only-write-batch and --hard-links Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

this has never happened to me before, and I'm somewhat at a loss. got a email from the cron thing... /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md10 WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md11 ok, md10 and md11 are each raid1's made from 2 x 72GB scsi drives, on a dell 2850 or something dual single-core 3ghz server. these two md's are in

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6916 Summary: Avoid bundling a modified zlib Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: matt at mattmccutchen.net

> I'll be happy to answer any further questions you may have, feel free to e-mail > me directly (though right now our mail server is down) > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: 1. llvm-ld will be used as "The Optimizer". 2. If the user has specified to generate the final executable, then llvm-ld should run on all the .bc files generated by clang

Hi, OS : Solaris 10 11/06 zpool list doesn''t reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? # ls -l total 209769330 -rw------T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme # zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT wo 136G 100G 36.0G 73% ONLINE - # rm deleteme # zpool list NAME SIZE