similar to: [Bug 11378] New: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[Bug 11378] New: Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc."

2015 Jul 04
0
[Bug 11378] Please add a '--line-buffered' option to rsync to make logging/output more friendly with pipes/syslog/CI systems/etc.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul
2020 Jun 19
9
[Bug 3184] New: Unable to add deprecated KexAlgorithms back for host via config file
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3184 Bug ID: 3184 Summary: Unable to add deprecated KexAlgorithms back for host via config file Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: ssh
2016 Apr 21
5
[Bug 11866] New: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866 Bug ID: 11866 Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:
2018 Nov 07
4
Avoiding constant HDD access
Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 >>> Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>
2018 Nov 07
2
Avoiding constant HDD access
Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin
2019 Nov 03
4
Recent inability to view long filenames stored with scp via samba mount
Greetings Samba team, It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually that was yesterday I applied them. > samba (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.23) xenial-security; urgency=medium > > * SECURITY UPDATE: client code can
1997 Oct 31
7
NT Domain logon
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > you'll need to do encrypted passwords for your users. what version of > > unix are you using? have you looked into PAMs? (plug-in authentication > > modules) > > The problem is, we'll never have cleartext passwords for the user. > Maintaining a separate password database is unnaceptable. If we wanted to
2018 Nov 07
3
Avoiding constant HDD access
I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin and never standby: root at rpi:~# pidstat -dl 20 Linux 4.4.50-v7+ (localhost) 11/07/2018 _armv7l_ (4 CPU) 04:10:08 AM UID PID kB_rd/s kB_wr/s kB_ccwr/s iodelay Command 04:10:28 AM
2020 Aug 11
2
Meaning of "failed verification -- update retained (will try again)."
Hi, I see some warnings like the following. Could anybody explains what they mean? Thanks. 19/31274477.pdf 257,169,119 0% 1.26MB/s 0:03:15 (xfr#121, to-chk=848309/1043298)WARNING: 18/32281577.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). WARNING: 19/28879866.pdf failed verification -- update retained (will try again). -- Regards, Peng
2002 Dec 20
1
smbclient and large file support
smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with large files (> 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree in all branches as well. -- ====================================================================== Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer
2015 Apr 14
1
The --inplace is very different from the behaviour of --partial when resuming a complex case transfer.
Hi all, >From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions: --inplace The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does not delete the file) So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for resuming a file with the following steps: 1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/
1997 Dec 07
3
KerbNet!
I want to thank whoever mentioned KerbNet by Cygnus Solutions! Wowza! I recommend that people check it out. It lets you implement Kerberos under UNIX and NT, and have them work together (so you have one *unified* security system that is used by both your NT and UNIX boxes). It's at http://www.cygnus.com/product/kerbnet-index.html It also does authentication *without* sending passwords over
2016 Jan 21
4
Why is my rsync transfer slow?
I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million files/approximately 1.8 TB data (a Mac OS X Time Machine backup) over a 100 MBit connection. I use rsync 3.1.1 from MacPorts (I first tried the built in rsync, version 2.6.9, since it has a Mac OS X specific cache parameter, but it ran out of memory) with the following parameters % rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f
1998 Oct 15
3
Performance tips for heavily loaded servers
Does nayone have a collection of performance tips for heavily loaded samba servers? I have a server that routinely has 45-90 connections and just runs really poorly. We've thrown more memory at it w/ some benefit, but not significant. This is on a linux 2.0.35 based machine. Does anyone have any suggestions? -- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan
1997 Dec 12
2
How to get nmbd to work?
I have NEVER been able to get nmbd to work in anything even remotely approximating a usable fashion. All I want it to do is DNS lookups. I can't even get it to do that reliably. It looks in some cases like it isn't even sending a response back to the querying clients. When I do a request that fails, I get this: --- nmb packet from 192.55.114.4(3175) header: id=8172 opcode=Query(0)
2008 Jun 23
1
Find_by_sql Doesn't Return Attributes?
My find_by_sql is not returning attributes of the calling model class. Thermo.find_by_sql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM thermo WHERE thermo_loc = ''back'' GROUP BY DAYOFWEEK(time_on) ASC") # ==> [#<Thermo >, #<Thermo >, #<Thermo >, #<Thermo >, #<Thermo >, #<Thermo >, #<Thermo >] The sql is fine and when I checked it in a mysql
2016 May 04
2
[Bug 11893] New: rsync should check local file access permission before connecting to remote end
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 Bug ID: 11893 Summary: rsync should check local file access permission before connecting to remote end Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core
2017 May 05
10
[Bug 12769] New: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 Bug ID: 12769 Summary: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core
2012 Jul 18
1
allow-notify SUBNET and request-xfr inconsistency
Hi list, We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server. The environment is set up as follows: 0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet; 1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114; 2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf; 3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet. Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to
2000 Dec 06
2
Problems on Sparcs (fwd)
comments? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Charles Clancy <mgrtcc at cs.rose-hulman.edu> Subject: Problems on Sparcs Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:55:41 -0500 (EST) Size: 2913 Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20001206/c7cb5d2a/attachment.mht