similar to: rsync - Management of UIDs and GIDs when reserved on a Remote system

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync has 4 options for this... 1) Write all files as the owner and group that rsync is running as. This is the default and the only possibility when not running as root since only root can create files as a different UID. 2) Copy the user name and group name. This is what you get when you are running as root and use --owner --group or --archive.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 No, rsync would store the files with the numeric UID and GID as is on the source without regard to the existence or non-existence of a matching account. This could mean that ls would show numbers in those columns, or incorrect names in those columns, or (perhaps by coincidence) show the correct names in those columns. The important thing is that if

Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > No, rsync would store the files with the numeric UID and GID as is on > the source without regard to the existence or non-existence of a > matching account. This could mean that ls would show numbers in those > columns, or incorrect names in those columns, or (perhaps by > coincidence) show the correct names in those columns. The

Kevin Korb <kmk <at> sanitarium.net> writes: > > 3) --numeric-ids copies both as the number. This is what you normally > want for backups. This way you have the exact UID and GID stored on > the backups regardless of what those numbers mean to the backup > system. Just remember to use --numeric-ids when you restore. This is > especially important if you have to

Wayne Davison <wayned <at> samba.org> writes: > The best place to add that include and the gettext define would be to put them in rsync.h somewhere, which would make the localisation idiom available in all the .c files. Putting it down at the bottom of the file would be a reasonable spot for it. Hi Wayne, I thought you must have fallen off the face of the earth or something like

Hi Folks, Well, it has only been more than 6 weeks and still no response to my "No localisation for rsync?" topic. :( So far, I have determined that there are at least 4 files that need translations for rsync. They are the following. main.c flist.c log.c progress.c For my initial test I only made the following modifications. main.c ------ I added the following line ... #include

I noticed that rsync can preserve most of the file's characteristics when it is used with "-a" option (it includes -o and -g flags for preserving owners and groups). However, when I transfer data between systems, it affects my UIDs/GIDs, making the data hard to recover. Example: Sending side: /etc/passwd: mark:x:503:503::/home/mark:/bin/bash file: -rw-rw-r-- 1 mark mark

Is there any SIMPLE way to maintain consistent mappings between windows RIDs and UNIX/LINUX UIDs/GIDs among multiple samba servers servers running winbindd? Will that problem be addressed in future samba releases? I've read about the "idmap backend" possible solution but is that the only current one? Help!!!

Hi William, > I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 > clients. > I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of > machines. > > The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: > > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. > > The Samba 3.6 domain

On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix > UIDs and GIDs. > > In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other > domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID > conflict. Also, I assume that in the

Hello! I've got users that access linux file server from Win stations using Samba and winbind authentication but also have AIX based workstations accessing the same server using nis authentication. They have the same username registered in NIS domain and in Windows domain. Is it possible to map winbind users (usually using uid & gid > 10000) to nis users, so user john

Hi Guys, Just a quick one...I use ldap backend for samba users and unix(PAM+NSS) users. If I was creating a new user/group/computer manually do the RID and UID/GID have to match up somehow or something?? I mean I've been reading somewhere that that RID should be somethings like UID+2x1000 or something?? Algorithmicbase?? Whats this all about? Am I making any sense? Cheers, Rhys

Hi everyone, I've succesfully managed to create a Centos 6 - Sernet Samba 4.1 DC and a member server for hosting the shares. To have the member working right (serving folders with right permissions without chmod777 the relative fs path) I have to set all the UID GID (at least primary group) for my users unless they'll be asked for user/pass when trying to access and they get locked

On 22/12/14 19:04, Rowland Penny wrote: >On 22/12/14 17:22, Denis Cardon wrote: >> Hi William, >> >>> I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba >>> 3.6 clients. >>> I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two >>> sets of machines. >> >> By the way, samba 3.6 is going end of life pretty

First, yes, I have read the piece on chroot.... Trying to get an AIX (5.3) to run rsync 2.6.2 as a daemon I have tried every possibly usage to stop chroot, used no and false, as on the web it has showed up as either. Also dropped flag --numeric-ids when running.... Here is my test config--- # Simple test config file log file = /tmp/rsync.log [test] use chroot = no path = /tmp/rsync_test/

Hello, I have a severe problem with gluster: User and Group IDs are broken, but not in all directories: drwxr-xr-x 103 p_kohn01 p0wess 4096 24. Jul 17:22 2013_07_24_17:22_10kupsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_10_00:44_500k_upsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_12_21:54_500k_upsilon_flat_1s drwxr-xr-x 2 p_kohn01 p0wess 6 6.

I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 clients. I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of machines. The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. The Samba 3.6 domain members currently have: idmap config MBSW : backend = rid idmap config

Hey all, I'm looking to merge multiple NT4 domains into a single infrastructure based on Samba3 and OpenLDAP on Linux of the Debian Sarge flavour (and, Bob willing, Samba4 before long). In order to allow some resources to be shared from a single Linux instance, I'm rather hoping that I can put every domain's information into a single LDAP DIT. The Samba PDCs will use only portions of

Le 14/01/2018 à 15:51, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 > Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix >> UIDs and GIDs. >> >> In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other >> domains, so

On 22/12/14 17:22, Denis Cardon wrote: > Hi William, > >> I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 >> clients. >> I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two >> sets of >> machines. >> >> The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: >> >> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >>