similar to: The easiest way to restore timestamps of files?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "The easiest way to restore timestamps of files?"

2015 Apr 29
1
The easiest way to restore timestamps of files?
Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > - --archive --itemize-changes --size-only --dry-run > Obviously the last one is so you can confirm what it is going to do. > > On 04/26/2015 06:08 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: >> Please, is possible (with rsync) re-create files timestamps? I mean >> something like choosing a "-T" in
2015 Apr 26
0
The easiest way to restore timestamps of files?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --archive --itemize-changes --size-only --dry-run Obviously the last one is so you can confirm what it is going to do. On 04/26/2015 06:08 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > Please, is possible (with rsync) re-create files timestamps? I mean > something like choosing a "-T" in the program mirror- from it's man > page e.g. there:
2014 Jul 08
1
The easiest way for Fedora 14 to Centos 6 migration?
I manage several Fedora 14 servers. They was not upgraded due to several reasons (systemd unreliability, K12LTSP support absence), some newer packages I was building & updating manually, some other (OpenOffice, Mozilla) was possible update from projects binaries. Now I consider the options to migrate them to Centos 6, possibly the easiest possible way. What I'd like is some as yum
2015 Sep 11
2
SAMBA as AD DC
Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto: > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote > ... > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > packages > > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora > > versions, > > at least this. >
2013 Oct 13
1
execute permissions missing after upgrade to Samba 4
After upgrading from samba-3.6.12 to samba-4.0.9 (Fedora 17 i686 -> Fedora 19 i686, smb.conf stayed same) I see weird behavior - windows client can not run executable files due to insufficient permissions. However, when I in Linux set (with 'chmod u+x,g+x ...') execution bit for these files, all is fine and windows client can run their. It seems for me as samba4 (contrary to samba3)
2015 Sep 11
1
SAMBA as AD DC
Il giorno ven, 11/09/2015 alle 14.25 +0200, Oscar Osta Pueyo ha scritto: > Hello, > > On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> > wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha > > scritto: > > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> > > > wrote >
2019 Mar 27
5
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed (ldbsearch has not -U and -V)
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:00:42 +0100 Franta Hanzlík <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote: > Yes, is no difference between '-UAdministrator' and '-U > Administrator'. But it seems, as ldbsearch in 4.9.5 is different than > 4.9.4-. (I was furious with that, because I found lot articles on > net, where -U _username_ was stated. > > My ldbsearch is from pure
2024 Mar 26
1
core & cosine schema items in Samba AD DC user object?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:50:41 +0100 Franta Hanzl?k <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:01:27 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:57:51 +0100 > > Franta Hanzl?k via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Please, it is possible (perhaps with some Samba
2018 Feb 06
2
LDAP userdb and dovecot LDA/LMTP - different requirements
Hi, I want to use Dovecot LDA (or rather LMTP) use as local deliver with Postfix MTA. Users are in LDAP DB with structure as: dn: cn=username, ou=rank, o=myorg cn: username objectClass: Person gidNumber: uNNN uidNumber: gNNN userPassword: (somehow hashed, can only bind verification) homeDirectory: /Home/$rank/$username mailActive: 0/1 mail: usera at OneDomain mail: userb at
2024 Mar 26
2
core & cosine schema items in Samba AD DC user object?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:57:51 +0100 Franta Hanzl?k via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Please, it is possible (perhaps with some Samba schema extension?) to > have items as 'c' (countryName), 'l' (localityName), 'l' > (localityName), 'co' (friendlyCountryName), 'street' (streetAddress), > 'displayName' etc. in the
2020 Aug 28
4
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: bail out of nouveau_channel_new if channel init fails
Unprivileged user can crash kernel by using DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC ioctl. This was reported by trinity[1] fuzzer. [ 71.073906] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: crashme[1329]: channel failed to initialise, -17 [ 71.081730] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0 [ 71.088928] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 71.094059] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present
2015 Sep 11
0
SAMBA as AD DC
Hello, On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto: > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote > > ... > > > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > > packages >
2020 Nov 15
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: bail out of nouveau_channel_new if channel init fails
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 6:43 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil at debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote: > > Unprivileged user can crash kernel by using DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC > > ioctl. This was reported by trinity[1] fuzzer. > > > > [ 71.073906] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: crashme[1329]:
2013 May 14
8
[Bug 820] New: Quotas not limiting the exact specified limit
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820 Summary: Quotas not limiting the exact specified limit Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2010 Apr 16
3
run R script from Excel VBA
I wrote a R script say called computeCovarMatrix.R and i want to call and run this piece from Excel visual basic. does anyone know how to do that? thanks, KZ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2020 Feb 06
4
No announcement for kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7
On our CentOS 7 servers I see there is a new kernel available when doing yum update: kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 kernel-devel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7 However I am not able to find any announcement at redhat.com for this kernel. The only announcement I find is this from CentOS: https://www.mail-archive.com/centos-announce at centos.org/msg11573.html However that CentOS announcement links to
2024 Mar 26
1
core & cosine schema items in Samba AD DC user object?
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:49:02 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:50:41 +0100 > Franta Hanzl?k <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:01:27 +0000 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:57:51 +0100 > > >
2008 Mar 13
4
AJAX slow - to_json responsible?
Hello. I am building full-ajax back-end, which consits of many quite big partials. As the system grows up, performance is problem. After every click, partial is refreshed, if needed. I am now at 0.5 sec / request. I tried to simply disable ajax and the result was quite suprising: the same page is rendered over 2x faster. I update 80% of page in case of ajax. (Please dont tell: dont use ajax when
2016 Feb 23
3
Re: guestmount without fstab
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:21:34PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday 23 February 2016 15:21:17 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > As for the particular question about lack of /etc/fstab. Are you > > getting some kind of error when using the guestmount -i option? It > > used to be (a long time ago) that libguestfs inspection[1] could not > > handle guests that did not
2019 Mar 27
4
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:45:18 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > > I dont think one noticed this.. > > ldbsearch -H ldap://dc4 -UAdministrator > ldbsearch -H ldap://dc1 -U Administrator > > So whats the difference when you see this responce of the command: > Invalid option -U: unknown ... >