similar to: rsync --delete

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "rsync --delete"

2015 Apr 16
2
rsync --delete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand what is wrong with rm either. But if you must have an empty directory is there a tmpfs where you can make one? Is there already an empty one like /var/empty? On 04/16/2015 10:13 AM, Ken Chase wrote: > Wow, it took me a few seconds to figure out what you were trying to > do. > > What's wrong with rm? >
2015 Apr 16
0
rsync --delete
Wow, it took me a few seconds to figure out what you were trying to do. What's wrong with rm? Also I think trying to leverage the side of disqualifying all source files just to get the delete effect (very clever but somewhat obtuse!) risks creating a temporary file of some kind in the target at the start of the operation, and if you cant even mkdir then that exceeds disk quota immediately
2015 Apr 16
0
rsync --delete
problem is he's trying to rsync into the target dir and have the side effect of delete. so an empty dir would necessarily need to be in the target of course and thus created there, triggering the quota block. he tried to avoid this by using device files then 'blocking all device files' but i think rsync figures out first there's nothing to do, so it just stops and doesnt do the
2017 Jan 25
4
why "DEFAULT" ?
Hello, Rsync. --log-file-format="|%i|%B|%U|%G|%l|[%M]|// %n" After backup log to get this line: 2017/01/25 17:30:09 [8781] |hf |rw-r--r--|500|DEFAULT|83875|[2014/02/10-18:22:09]|// xml_error.txt groupID = DEFAULT The server looks like this: ls -lan | grep xml_error.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 500 1002 83875 Фев 10 2014 xml_error.txt groupID = 1002 The documentation is written:
2018 Jul 18
2
link-dest and batch-file
Hello. I need that during today's backup, the metadata about the files is saved in a file, so that tomorrow when creating a backup with the option "link-dest" instead of this option I would specify a file with metadata, then rsync will not scan the folder specified in "link-dest", but simply reads information about this folder from a file with
2018 Jun 26
5
link-dest and batch-file
Hello. I am launching a cron bash script that does the following: Day 1 /usr/bin/rsync -aH --link-dest /home/backuper/.BACKUP/0000009/2018-06-25 root at 192.168.1.103:/home/ /home/backuper/.BACKUP/0000009/2018-06-26 Day 2 /usr/bin/rsync -aH --link-dest /home/backuper/.BACKUP/0000009/2018-06-26 root at 192.168.1.103:/home/ /home/backuper/.BACKUP/0000009/2018-06-27 Day 3 /usr/bin/rsync -aH
2018 Jul 20
1
Aw: Re: link-dest and batch-file
But don‘t forget —inplace, otherwise snapshots would not be efficient > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2018 um 21:53 Uhr > Von: "Kevin Korb via rsync" <rsync at lists.samba.org> > An: rsync at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: link-dest and batch-file > > If you are using ZFS then forget --link-dest. Just rsync to the same > zfs mount every time and do a zfs
2015 Oct 23
2
What does the group "DEFAULT"?
Hello. option %G --log-file-format = "|% i |% B |% U |% G |% l | [% M] |% n" What does the group "DEFAULT"? Why is not shown, instead of "DEFAULT" figures GID? -- Sergey Dugin QWARTA
2018 Jun 26
0
link-dest and batch-file
I don't believe there is anything you can do with the batch options for this. If you added a --write-batch to each of those you would get 3 batch files that wouldn't be read without a --read-batch. If you also did a --read-batch that would contain differences between a backup and the backup before it so rsync would still have to read the backup before it to understand the batch (and this
2018 Jul 18
0
link-dest and batch-file
If you are using ZFS then forget --link-dest. Just rsync to the same zfs mount every time and do a zfs snapshot after the rsync finishes. Then delete old backups with a zfs destroy. On 07/18/2018 03:42 PM, Дугин Сергей via rsync wrote: > Hello. > > I need that during today's backup, the metadata about the files is > saved in a file, so that tomorrow when creating a
2015 Feb 28
2
rsync slow exclude folder
Hi, Rsync. rsync version 3.0.9 protocol version 30 rsync -a --exclude="tmp/*" /home/ /backup/home/ It is necessary that the contents of the folder tmp copy, but the folder tmp in backup was created. If the folder /home/tmp/ is many millions of files, rsync think of this folder can be seen through the lsof -p PID If you do so: rsync -a --exclude="tmp/" /home/
2015 May 18
0
Two questions
Hello, Rsync. rsync version 3.0.9 protocol version 30: 1) Why test.log changes not only on the parameter --log-file-format and the parameter --out-format? rsync -a --delete -vv --log-file-format="%i|%o|%B|%U|%G|%M|%f" --log-file=/home/test.log /home/124/ /home/1/ 2015/05/18 12:40:43 [21148] building file list 2015/05/18 12:40:43 [21148] delta-transmission disabled for local
2010 Mar 15
2
cwrsync and link-dest option
Hello, In a small environment I have to backup two servers, an Ubuntu 9.10 and a Windows Server 2008 machine. My Backuphost is a Ubuntu 9.10 machine as well. I installed rsync on both Ubuntu hosts from repository (3.0.6) and cwrsync from http://www.itefix.no/i2/node/10650 (3.0.7). Then I wrote some Bash-Scripts which executes rsync every week like that: BACKUPDIR=/var/backup rsync -v -a
2015 Jul 29
4
Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is no inconvenience. What is the inconvenience of encrypting your device
2015 Feb 18
13
[LLVMdev] [3.6 Release] RC4 has been tagged
Hello testers, RC4 has just been tagged (at r229782 on the branch). RC3 was disqualified due to an infloop that Duncan reported, and fixed in r229421. That, fixes for a few scary X86 bugs, a GCC5 bootstrap problem (PR22625), and parts of PR22589 is included in RC4. Baring any showstoppers, this release candidate will be promoted to release. Please let me know how it looks and upload binaries
2017 Jun 29
6
package to fit mixtures of student-t distributions
Hello! I am new to R (before used python exclusively and would actually call the R solution for this issue inside a python notebook, hope that doesn?t disqualify me right of the batch). Right now I am looking for a piece of software to fit a 1D data sample to a mixture of t-distributions. I searched quite a while already and it seems to be that this is a somehwat obscure endeavor as most
2015 Sep 08
3
Euro LLVM videos finally online - proposal to use torrents for sharing
On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 8 September 2015 at 19:20, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> Youtube has been discussed in the past but we have usually defaulted to >> mainly hosted on llvm.org and then a copy could potentially be on YouTube. I >> would want this to be an official
2018 Jul 07
2
Testing for vectors
Hi all, Is there are base function that I've missed that tests if an object is a vector in the dimensionality sense, rather than the data structure sense? i.e. something that checks is.null(dim(x)) ? is.vector() is trivially disqualified since it also checks for the presence of non-names attributes: x <- factor(c("a", "a", "b")) is.vector(x) #> [1] FALSE
2010 Oct 04
8
Can I "upgrade" a striped pool of vdevs to mirrored vdevs?
Hi, once I created a zpool of single vdevs not using mirroring of any kind. Now I wonder if it''s possible to add vdevs and mirror the currently existing ones. Thanks, budy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
2009 Mar 19
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm][gsoc] Where we at?
> > I am wondering about the status of GSoc this year. The mailing list seems to be rather quiet on the topic. Has anyone thought of project ideas? > We just received confirmation that LLVM was accepted for this year GSoC. > The ideas list, as usual, is placed at > http://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html (it also contains links to > subproject's ideas pages). > > Please