similar to: [Bug 11161] New: rare crash in hlink.c:536

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 11161] New: rare crash in hlink.c:536"

2008 Apr 22
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5407] New: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Summary: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2009 Oct 16
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6821] New: Assertion failed so rsync crashes (path includes special char)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6821 Summary: Assertion failed so rsync crashes (path includes special char) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2007 Sep 17
0
assertion failed after too many links error
While using dirvish, I ran into a runaway rsync process, which was continually spewing errors after encountering a "Too many links" error. This was with 2.6.9. I tried it again with the latest cvs version, and now at least it doesn't endless-loop with errors, but instead gives an assertion error. To reproduce: $ cd /tmp $ mkdir a b $ cd a $ date > a $ x=1 $ while ln a a$x; do
2010 May 26
11
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7454] New: assertion failed in finish_hard_link()
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7454 Summary: assertion failed in finish_hard_link() Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bas at debian.org
2001 Jun 29
1
wtmpx problem on Solaris 8 sparcv9 (64bit) environment
Hello When I was using OpenSSH-2.9p2 in Solaris 8 sparcv9 (64bit) environment, I found some trouble that wtmpx has broken. The size of utmpx structure object becomes larger than 32 bit environment in sparcv9 environment.Therefore, instead of using utmpx structure object, using futmpx structure object is better. In sparcv9 environment, futmpx structure object is used instead of utmpx structure
2001 Nov 20
0
PATCH: Fixing last/utmpx for Solaris
In case it is any help, here is the patch against openssh-3.0.1p1 that corrects the problem with last reporting on Solaris that I sent to the list a week or so ago against 3.0p1. There was no conversation about this aside from Rip Loomis' comment about including it to support BSM auditing - does this present a problem for other OSes to include the ut_name field in the utmpx entry? Should this
2002 Jan 29
0
[Bug 84] New: last command provides incorrect information on Solaris 8
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84 Summary: last command provides incorrect information on Solaris 8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: UltraSparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
2001 Nov 15
1
Patch for "last" providing incorrect information on Solaris 8
I have put together a simple set of diffs that corrects the problem described by Steven Fishback <sfishback at interpath.net> on 10-30 on this list regarding incorrect information reported by last on Solaris. The patches merely pass along the username in the utmpx record for a logout. Is there any reason why this would be a problem with other OSes? If not, maybe this could be rolled into the
2009 Dec 25
2
[openssh-portable] utmpx and ut_name
Hello OpenSSH hackers, The last couple of weeks I've been figuring out how hard it is to replace FreeBSD's <utmp.h> with <utmpx.h>. I don't think utmpx is perfect, but at least it's better than what we have now and at least it has gone through some form of standardisation. I noticed POSIX says the following [1]: | The <utmpx.h> header shall define the utmpx
2002 Dec 29
0
[Bug 460] New: ut_addr_v6 not used
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Summary: ut_addr_v6 not used Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.5p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/167867 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at
2001 Jan 29
1
Solaris wtmpx patch
Hi, Solaris (tested with 2.6) needs a username in the logout record in the wtmpx file. Currently openssh (version 2.3.0p1) leaves the username (utmpx.ut_user) empty in logout records, which leads to conflicting results from the last command. Example: # last -5 siegert siegert pts/186 stikine.ucs.sfu. Mon Jan 15 14:26 still logged in siegert pts/105 stikine.ucs.sfu. Mon Jan 15
2012 Mar 25
1
link(2) EMLINK error behavior with --link-dest and --hard-links
Hi, I'm having a problem using --link-dest and --hard-links when the fs hits the hard link limit (link(2) returns EMLINK). Using rsync 3.0.7 an error is thrown and the target file is not created. Glancing at git head it _looks_ like things could now be a little nicer. Perhaps the target file is copied instead of hard linked when hardlinking fails -- I've not tested it. Anyway, the
2000 Jul 02
0
patch for NetBSD utmp (ut_name instead of ut_host)
here are patches to compile portable openssh 2.1.1p2 on netbsd, and some other platforms I suppose. itojun -------------- next part -------------- $NetBSD: patch-aa,v 1.8 2000/07/02 22:07:56 itojun Exp $ --- configure.in.orig Sat Jul 1 15:52:55 2000 +++ configure.in Mon Jul 3 06:49:00 2000 @@ -647,2 +647,6 @@ +OSSH_CHECK_HEADER_FOR_FIELD(ut_name, utmp.h, HAVE_NAME_IN_UTMP)
2000 Jul 04
0
AW: FreeBSD 3.5-STABLE
At 08:15 04/07/00 +0200, Bladt Norbert wrote: >> Darren Evans [SMTP:darren at horseplay.demon.co.uk] wrote: >> >> gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" >-DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" - >> DSSH_ASKPASS_DEFAULT=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh/ssh-askpass\" >-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c loginrec.c >> loginrec.c:
2002 Jan 13
1
rsynd-2.5.1 / hlink.c patches
Platform: Compaq OpenVMS Alpha 7.3 Compiler: Compaq C T6.5 The following patch resolves compile problems with the HLINK.C module. The cast on function argument for the qsort() routine was wrong, and not allowing the compile to complete. When the function definiton of the hlink_compare() is corrected to have the const qualifiers, the cast inside the qsort() function call is no longer
2014 Feb 24
1
loginrec.c: bug in construct_utmpx() definition?
Hello, I am trying to cross compile OpenSSH_5.8p2 on linux for a powerpc target with uClibc available. My problem is that I get a error when loginrec.c is compiled: openssh/loginrec.c: In function 'construct_utmpx': openssh/loginrec.c:790:10: error: 'ut' undeclared (first use in this function) openssh/loginrec.c:790:10: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
2009 Jul 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6542] New: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542 Summary: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core
2017 Apr 13
0
[PATCH] Detect correct systemdsystemshutdowndir
nut hardcodes systemdsystemshutdowndir to ${libdir}/systemd/system-shutdown. This is not valid: - Executable helpers are installed to ${libexecdir}, which is different from ${libdir} on bi-arch systems. - Even if nut will use ${libexecdir}, it could be different from systemd libexecdir. That is why it is better to check systemd.pc for the correct path. That path is stored as systemdutildir.
2009 Jan 14
2
Update link for SuSE packages on networkupstools.org?
Arjen, all I don't know if there is some prohibition against it, but the packages.html link for SuSE RPMs should be changed from: http://software.opensuse.org/ To something useful that will get the site visitors to the actual rpms. For the packages that were part of the distribution: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/ or for updated packages on build service: