Displaying 20 results from an estimated 13000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Consider nanoseconds when quick-checking for unchanged files"
2016 Jan 20
2
[PATCH] Consider nanoseconds when quick-checking for unchanged files
I wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:02:27 +0100:
> --- a/generator.c 2014-06-14 01:05:08.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/generator.c 2015-01-02 15:50:30.000000000 +0100
> @@ -588,7 +588,14 @@
> if (ignore_times)
> return 0;
> - return cmp_time(st->st_mtime, file->modtime) == 0;
> + return cmp_time(st->st_mtime, file->modtime) ==
2008 Mar 04
1
preserve ctimes of *unchanged* directories on receiver
'rsync -a' updates the ctime on a directory even if no file in that directory
has changed. A kind of workaround is to use '-O', but then the mtimes of
directories are not preserved.
(Usage example where this is important: maintain a copy of filesystem A in
filesystem B, and use filesystem B as the source for incremental backups
(e.g., with star). rsync is run before an
2009 Aug 29
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6672] New: mtim.tv_nsec not used when reading time of a file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6672
Summary: mtim.tv_nsec not used when reading time of a file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: antonio at
2015 Sep 14
3
[Bug 11521] New: rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to determine file differences
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
Bug ID: 11521
Summary: rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to
determine file differences
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
2016 Jan 25
0
[Bug 11521] rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to determine file differences
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:43:20 -0800
> From: Wayne Davison <wayne at thedavisons.net>
A couple questions below; please bear with me.
> No, if you do a ext4 -> ext4 copy, rsync has set the matching ns info for
> transferred files since 3.1.0. There was a case prior to rsync 3.1.2 where
> a brand-new file transferred in the same second it was created
2016 Jan 20
1
[PATCH] Consider nanoseconds when quick-checking for unchanged files
On Wed 20 Jan 2016, Andrey Gursky wrote:
>
> I was just about to implement the same, since nanoseconds are taken
> into account when transferring, thus making it obvious not to ignore
Really? I thought the protocol only transmits seconds.
Paul
2006 Nov 12
1
Superfluous error msgs: "failed to set times ..."
When rsync'ing to an Ext2 file system (via SSH), then I frequently get
error messages such as "failed to set times ...". AFAICS, these error
messages are caused by rsync trying to change the time (and permissions,
ownership) of symbolic links, which according to my knowledge is not
possible on Ext2.
Is there any way to get rid of these supposedly superfluous error
messages?
rsync
2016 Jan 21
0
[PATCH] Consider nanoseconds when quick-checking for unchanged files
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Ingo Brückl <ib at wupperonline.de> wrote:
> On systems using nanoseconds differences should be taken into
> consideration.
>
The problem is that if you transfer from a filesystem that has nanoseconds
to one that does not support it, rsync would consider most of the files to
be constantly different, since the nanosecond values would only match if
2014 Sep 22
2
[PATCH] New APIs: Implement stat calls that return nanosecond timestamps (RHBZ#1144891).
The existing APIs guestfs_stat, guestfs_lstat and guestfs_lstatlist
return a stat structure that contains atime, mtime and ctime fields
that store only the timestamp in seconds.
Modern filesystems can store timestamps down to nanosecond
granularity, and the ordinary glibc stat(2) wrapper will return these
in "hidden" stat fields:
struct timespec st_atim; /* Time of last
2014 Mar 10
5
[Bug 10494] New: remove-source-files fails with symlinks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10494
Summary: remove-source-files fails with symlinks
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: afried at deteque.com
2004 Apr 10
0
patches for copying atimes
Hi.
Here's a patch for copying the atimes of files when -t/--times is
given. I bumped the protocol to 29 since it sends more data over the
wire. It obviously does not send the atime if it's sending data to an
older rsync version.
It passes all the tests (including the added atime.test) for me on a:
Linux Debian/3.0 gcc 2.95.4 (debian), glibc 2.2.5 system.
Any questions/feedback? I
2017 Apr 09
0
failed to set times on ... Invalid argument (22) and what to do with it
Dear All,
Along with the files that suddenly disappear, we have a bit of a problem
with these that do not.
Namely, in my test runs I can see a small but stable set of files, that
rsync is repeatedly trying to transfer, and then repeatedly fails to
updates their times ; and then the story repeats itself.
The situation is illustrated by the log snippet below, where I have
changed file names to
2004 Apr 20
1
improved atime patch
I posted a patch a few days ago that adds copying of atime. At that
time, it was just enabled with -t/--times. After some time, we have
figured out that that choice might not have been the best. Here's a
new version of the patch (relative to CVS) that adds -A/--copy-atime
instead. It also includes a test case.
Any feedback on this patch and/or the previous one that I posted?
2016 Jun 14
1
timestamp granularity
Apple File System Guide is released.
https://developer.apple.com/library/prerelease/content/documentation/FileManagement/Conceptual/APFS_Guide/GeneralCharacteristics/GeneralCharacteristics.html
>Nanosecond Timestamp Granularity
>
>APFS supports 1 nanosecond timestamp granularity, which improves
>upon the 1 second timestamp granularity of HFS+.
>Compatibility
>
>You can share
2011 Oct 13
1
[hivex][PATCH] Increase filetime printing resolution to sub-second
Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <ajnelson at cs.ucsc.edu>
---
xml/hivexml.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xml/hivexml.c b/xml/hivexml.c
index 5030c24..98b90c5 100644
--- a/xml/hivexml.c
+++ b/xml/hivexml.c
@@ -185,6 +185,8 @@ filetime_to_8601 (int64_t windows_ticks)
char *ret;
time_t t;
struct tm *tm;
+ int64_t sub_seconds;
2004 Dec 13
2
[LLVMdev] Which StatusInfo fields should have values set when dealing with win32 platform
Hi,
Does any one have an idea which fields and how to the values correctly of
the StatusInfo struct when dealing with the information returned in the
BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION struct
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/base/by_handle_file_information_str.asp)
from windows instead of the unix stuff in getStatusInfo:
--- (excerpt start) -------------
2004 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] Which StatusInfo fields should have values set when dealing with win32 platform
I'm implementing this right now. BY_HANDLE_FILE_INFORMATION isn't the
correct API, as Path doesn't have an open file handle handy. Nor does
it need one.
Reid Spencer wrote:
>Henrik,
>
>modTime.fromWin32Time(ftLastWriteTime);
> Note that you'll need write a "fromWin32Time" for the TimeValue
> class to make the conversion of ftLastWriteTime to
2011 Sep 20
17
Sched_op hypercall small questions
Greetings all.
Some small question regarding schedule poll operation hypercall.
1. struct sched_poll poll.timeout is measured in what unit of time?
Secs, ms? ns?
2. After issuing the hypercall_sched_op(SCHEDOP_poll, &poll); if no
timeout is used in poll struct how long will I yield the CPU?
3. If I issue the hypercall and the event never comes is it possible
to to yield the CPU for ever?
2016 Nov 17
2
NamedRegionTimer - printing structured data, full nanosecond resolution values
Hi all,
I'd like to output structured data for all of the gathered timers with the full nanosecond numbers to a file, say JSON for example. Does the timer infrastructure support this, or at least installing some custom print handlers? If not, does any of that sound like an interesting patch?
David
2014 Sep 22
0
Re: [PATCH] New APIs: Implement stat calls that return nanosecond timestamps (RHBZ#1144891).
On Monday 22 September 2014 13:48:38 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The existing APIs guestfs_stat, guestfs_lstat and guestfs_lstatlist
> return a stat structure that contains atime, mtime and ctime fields
> that store only the timestamp in seconds.
>
> Modern filesystems can store timestamps down to nanosecond
> granularity, and the ordinary glibc stat(2) wrapper will return these