Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Floating IP breaks AD replication"
2020 Nov 23
3
Floating IP breaks AD replication
Maybe this is a stupid idea, but what we are doing here is using just the
domain name for all sorts of services, i.e. LDAP.
So instead of pointing a client to dc1.somedom.contoso.com or
dc2.somedom.contoso.com, we point them to somedom.contoso.com which is then
resolved to both and the client can pick.
Best regards
Johannes
Am Mo., 23. Nov. 2020 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Rowland penny via samba <
2020 Nov 23
3
Floating IP breaks AD replication
> we point them to somedom.contoso.com which is then
> resolved to both and the client can pick
I want to avoid Round-Robin DNS
> You cannot use CTDB with AD DCs
You can.
/etc/ctdb/nodes
192.168.30.11
192.168.30.12
/etc/ctdb/public_addresses
192.168.30.10/24 ens18
/etc/ctdb/events/legacy/20.samba-ad.script
#!/usr/bin/env bash
function monitor_ldap() {
ldbsearch -H
2020 Nov 23
2
Floating IP breaks AD replication
> Your DC's really should have fixed IP's
Well, they have.
But there are still projects
which can not use multiple DNS Names.
e.g.
- https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/139
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/6898
So I use an additional floating IP
> I cannot recommend anyone using your method
Why not? Even if AD replication is quite robust
concerning multi
2020 Nov 23
0
Floating IP breaks AD replication
On 23/11/2020 16:50, Sven Wick via samba wrote:
>
>> You cannot use CTDB with AD DCs
> You can.
OK, I will change that to 'Do not use CTDB with Samba AD DCs'
A cluster is where all the same data is stored on multiple computers but
they act as if they were just one computer, which funnily enough is what
Samba AD dc's do, so you are wrapping something that acts like one
2015 Feb 02
2
Fileserver Failover with AD and Gluster
I currently plan to move my storage to Gluster. One of the anticipated
advantages is to have Gluster replicate data among physical nodes, i.e.
if one node dies the file service can live on.
AD for authentication also replicates nice on distinct physical nodes.
So the remaining single point of failure is the samba file service. Is
there something more intelligent than:
if not \\severA\share
2016 Mar 30
2
AoE (ata-over-ethernet) for sysvol ?
Hai,
I was just reading : https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/ata-over-ethernet-aoe-on-debian-8-jessie/
I was wondering, anyone tried AoE for sysvol, so i dont needs replication anymore.
Anyone Pro’s and Con’s ?
Or can anyone tell of sysvol is going to be replicated by samba so we dont need scripts anymore.
Greetz,
Louis
2013 Feb 12
1
Replication Ok, or not?
Setup a DC using 4.0.3 - all appears to go fine...
Setup a second DC and everything works fine to here...but I'm not sure
if replication is actually working or not.
Here's what I get from ./samba-tool drs showrepl
I've also done. [./samba-tool drs kcc -Uadministrator
dc2.samba.somedom.local] in an attempt to fix the replication problem.
(or what I think is a problem.)
[The outbound
2012 Nov 27
6
CTDB / Samba / GFS2 - Performance - with Picture Link
Hello,
maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment.
So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know
2015 Feb 02
3
Fileserver Failover with AD and Gluster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.02.2015 um 13:30 schrieb Sven Schwedas:
> On 2015-02-02 12:56, Lars Hanke wrote:
>> I currently plan to move my storage to Gluster. One of the
>> anticipated advantages is to have Gluster replicate data among
>> physical nodes, i.e. if one node dies the file service can live
>> on.
>>
>> AD for
2014 Apr 03
1
CTDB Error / tcp port 445 not repsonding
Hi,
i need some help. We have two Networks. A CTDB Cluster and one domain controller in the same network. All other domain controller are outside this network. They are both connected with a firewall / router.
We activated netbios over tcp on the other domain controllers outside but it seems that when we remove the single internal domain controller ctdb will not start with the following error.
2007 Jul 11
3
Install errors
I''ve been trying to install Ferret on RedHat 7.3, Ruby 1.8 (let me know
if more details would be helpful) using the gem install. I''ve tried
every version >10 and it installs, but I get errors:
Building native extensions. This could take a while...
In file included from q_filtered_query.c:1:
search.h:683: array size missing in ''comparables''
make: ***
2015 Oct 22
3
joining second DC to domain and non creation of DC DNS records
Hi, I am in the middle of creating (or should that be re-creating) my
test domain, creation of the first DC went without incidence, so I moved
on to the second DC and this is where the problems started.
I downloaded samba 4.3.1 and compiled it, I then setup bind9 etc and
joined the new DC to the domain, everything seemed ok, so I then started
testing DNS. This is where I found that my nice
2010 Feb 17
5
Samba4 clustering
Hello,
is there a way to cluster samba4 with ctdb?
The old [global] parameters of samba3
Will not work:
Clustering=yes <--unknown with testparm
Idmap backend= tdb2 <--unknown with testparm
Greeetings
Daniel
-----------------------------------------------
EDV Daniel M?ller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 T?bingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax:
2015 Oct 23
4
joining second DC to domain and non creation of DC DNS records
Hi Rowland,
I have similar problem with sernet 4.2.4 package: no dns entry created and logs are showing NOTAUTH for dnsupdate
Here is my work around:
New DC joins domain with:
--dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ and --server=partnerDC.contoso.com
Don't start samba or bind yet !!
After that I've to correct some permissions rights on these folders/files (bind can read):
- private
- dns
- dns/*
-
2014 Jun 27
4
Missing features, RLY?!? & readme1st again
Missing features from memory from following this mailinglist:
- Win7 join to AD still requires two registry changes.
- SYSVOL is not replicated, use a cronjob with rsync.
- Domain-Trust works only in one direction (which one?).
- winbind does not work on DCs, use a separate file server.
- Joining an AD requires one of its DCs in the same subnet?
- Cluster filesystems destroy TDB files, use CTDB.
-
2017 Sep 08
3
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
On 2017-09-08 14:21, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> OK, you have convinced me ;-)
If you know any other part of AD DNS that is tricky, I'd be interested
to know before AD blows up again. ;-)
> Seeing how you seem to know the required 'magic', do you feel up to
> sharing it, if you do I will add a page to the Samba wiki.
What magic? How to set up dnsmasq as caching proxy?
2019 Oct 23
1
AD Member Server and 'vfs objects recycle' permission problems
Hi,
on our samba 4 domain member server we use the vfs objects module
'recycle'.
Unfortunately we ran into a strange permission problem with deleted
folders.
The newly created folders in the recycle folder have the wrong
permission. The deleted file(s) itself has the correct group (rw)
permissions.
The shares correct permissions:
getfacl Papierkorb/
# file: Papierkorb/
# owner: root
#
2019 Feb 13
3
idmap backend ad well-known-sids 512 & 513
Hi,
we are in the process of testing a migration from our NT Classic Domain
with OpenLdap to Samba AD.
In our test setup migration of all accounts, groups and computer
accounts went well using the classicupgrade path.
Next step now is testing how to add a member server for file server
services.
We were able to get the server to join the domain and also idmapping
works mostly as expected.
2014 Feb 19
2
Samba4: Strange Behaveiour On Home share with 2 DC replicating /vfs glusterfs
There is a strange behaviour having two DCs joined in one Domain concerning
the [home] share.
The [home] is fixed on a replicating gluster volume on both DC.
Now creating the users directory with ADUC ex.: \\s4master\home\%username%
would do the necessary and the directory is created on both dcs. On the
first DC all working fine
without any issue but on the second the user cannot login their home
2017 Sep 08
2
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
On 2017-09-08 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:03:53 +0200
> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rowland,
>>
>> Very appriciated.
>> The dnsmasq servers are explained, these are no problem in his setup
>> sofar i could tell/see.
>>
> Yes, but do the dnsmasq servers