similar to: dnsupdate failed with TKEY is unaceptable

Rommel Rodriguez Toiracrommelrt at nauta.cu On 18/11/2020 17:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote:>?? > In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined

? In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network. ? ? But I have a "dnsupdate_nameupdate_done: Failed DNS update with

On 18/11/2020 19:27, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac wrote: > > ?It is /etc/named.conf and /etc/samba/smb.conf > > > # cat /etc/named.conf > > > ??tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; > > > include "/usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > OK, does the /usr/local/samba/bind-dns directory exist ? if it does, is the

-------- Mensaje original --------> ?> In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.18) and following the wiki.samba.org guide I have joined it as a domain controller to my network.> ?> ? But I have a

On 18/11/2020 19:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote: > Rommel Rodriguez Toiracrommelrt at nauta.cu > On 18/11/2020 17:34, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba wrote:>?? > In my network I have a samba 4.11.4 as Active Directory Domain Controller installed in CentOS 7 (gtmad.gtm.onat.gob.cu - 192.168.41.17). I have recently installed samba 4.13.2 in CentOS 8 (gtmad1.gtm.onat.gob.cu

El 20 de noviembre de 2020 2:22:45 GMT-05:00, "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> escribi?: >I suggest you read : >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > Hello; I read the URL sugessted. There exist a Kerberos principal; there exist the bind AD account and the files permission in /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab are

Hello; last week the power (energy) of the servers fail and it shutdown all. When the power restart in the check I find that the samba4 AD DC have problems. It work, but the users in some of the container or OU dissapear, I mean, when I check with the RSAT the OU in with the user most be, is empty When I try to run # samba-tool dbcheck this is what I have: [root at gtmad ~]# samba-tool

Hello all; I use CentOS 7.5.1804 I update from samba-4.8.2 to samba-4.9.1 and finish with not errors, but when I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs I have the error: [root at gtmad ~]# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4087 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeEncodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe9' in

Hello all; I am installing samba4 (version 4.9.5) on Debian 10.5 to use it as a member of a samba4 AD DC domain (version 4.11.4). I am following the guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member but I am having problems starting samba. So far I have installed the necessary packages listed here

On 10/12/15 14:00, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 10.12.2015 um 14:38 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 10/12/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> Is it possible that kdc server is always the SOA, at least if >>> derived from DNS and not specified *explicitly* in the krb5.conf? >>> >>> In my DNS-Manager console I find that >>> >>>

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

Hello all; In my network I have a server with samba4 as AD DC and two domain members as file servers with samba4. One of then work property, but the other not. My samba4 AD DC version is compiled from sources: [root at gtmad ~]# samba -V Version 4.5.5 The samba4 as domain member (files server) are installing from .rpm packages of CentOS7. [root at gtmpve /]# uname --all Linux

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Hello to all; I use CentOS Linux release 7.8.2003. I have installed samba4 Version 4.11.4 When compiling samba4 I used the following: ./configure --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --enable-debug --enable-selftest -j2 -p --cross-answers --cross-execute --enable-cups --disable-iprint --with-acl-support --with-profiling-data --with-systemd I use samba on three

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

On 03/09/2019 10:07, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Samba 4.10.7 with Bind9_DLZ (9.10.3-P4-Debian), but I'm not > getting to insert a new DC into the Domain. My SO is a VM Debian 9.9. > > Following is the command used and the error: > > root at samba4-dc3:/var/lib/samba/private# samba-tool domain join > empresa.com.br DC -k yes

El 8 de noviembre de 2018 4:02:52 PM GMT-05:00, Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escribió: > Hello all; >I use CentOS 7.5.1804 >I update from samba-4.8.2 to samba-4.9.1 and finish with not errors, >but when I run > >samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs > >I have the error: > >[root at gtmad ~]# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs

El 6 de abril de 2017 15:43:11 GMT-04:00, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escribió: >On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:19:04 -0400 >Rommel Rodriguez Toirac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> I follow your guides to configure the Domain member server and the >> file server. In this message I send the result of some checks that