similar to: Signal 11 on domain join (Debian 10 Samba 4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1)

> ...googling around seems to me that are ''old limitation'', now gone. No. root at vdcsv1:~# samba-tool domain provision --server-role=dc --use-rfc2307 --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --realm=AD.FVG.LNF.IT --domain=LNFFVG Administrator password will be set randomly! You are not root or your system do not support xattr, using tdb backend for attributes. not using extended attributes

I am trying to install samba 4.5.1 from source, as a domain controller only, under Ubuntu 16.04, with ZFS filesystem (actually inside an lxd container with ZFS backing). Out-of-the-box, samba-tool domain provision does not like the filesystem: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix

On 26.09.2016 19:20, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 26.09.2016 14:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:18:02PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> has anyone ever run "make check" from nbd against nbdkit with a python >>> plugin? I usually get segfaults during such a run, and sometimes various

If it's imported here's the DC-Provision log too: service-samba-dc | Looking up IPv4 addresses service-samba-dc | More than one IPv4 address found. Using 192.168.188.2 service-samba-dc | Looking up IPv6 addresses service-samba-dc | No IPv6 address will be assigned service-samba-dc |

Andrew, thank you for your help! Could a "Bus error" be related to a hardware problem? Never seen it before. Anyways, here is the output of my debugging session (I hope I did everything correctly): [root at server bin]# gdb --args python /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool dbcheck GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-75.el6) Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Hi, Hope this is the right place to ask about this... I did a clean install of S4 alpha10 the other day and attempted to provision it with the python script provided. This failed with a segmentation fault, however doing this with alpha8 does not fail. I've compiled this under arm5 little endian on Ubuntu 9.04 and included a backtrace below. Any ideas where I'm going wrong or is this a

Hello, I'm trying to join a samba-fileserver to a 4.8.4 Domain Controller. Both are installed from the Debian Unstable Sources. I've setup some scripts that allows me to provision the latest samba-version for testing purposes on two VMs. The following configs where working absolutly fine when provisioning a Samba-DC version 4.7.3 and I was able to do profile roaming, but since the DC is

On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Anyone? >> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? >> >> > Hi, > > I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only >

Hello I am trying to get libvirt-python working in Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit system. I tried installing the binaries from the repo itself: 1. root@test-vm8-109:/home/test# libvirtd --version libvirtd (libvirt) 1.2.2 root@test-vm8-109:/home/test# python Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56) [GCC 4.8.2] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or

Hi Harish, I believe the proper establishment of a connection should be done by libvirt.open() or libvirt.openAuth() or libvirt.openReadOnly(). All of them will return a functional virConnect instance. I'm not sure this segfault is worth to fix since instantiate a virConnect directly is not an expected usage. Hope this information will help you. Best Regards, Hao Liu +86-010-62608262

Trying again. Is there another mailer list for libvirt-python related discussions? Regards, Harish On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Harish Vishwanath <harish.shastry@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello > > I am trying to get libvirt-python working in Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit system. I > tried installing the binaries from the repo itself: > > 1. > > root@test-vm8-109:/home/test#

On 26.09.2016 14:29, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:18:02PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> has anyone ever run "make check" from nbd against nbdkit with a python >> plugin? I usually get segfaults during such a run, and sometimes various >> other errors happen before the segfault, suggesting that some memory

Hello, I don't know if this question ought to go here, or rather on R-devel, so please bear with me. I'm interfacing to R via RPy (rpy.sf.net) and an embedded Python interpreter. This is really quite convenient. I use this approach to calculate the correlation coefficient of 1 independent dataset (vector) with 4 dependent vectors. It'd be nice if that could be done in 4 parallel

Hello, I don't know if this question ought to go here, or rather on R-devel, so please bear with me. I'm interfacing to R via RPy (rpy.sf.net) and an embedded Python interpreter. This is really quite convenient. I use this approach to calculate the correlation coefficient of 1 independent dataset (vector) with 4 dependent vectors. It'd be nice if that could be done in 4 parallel

Hi, We are having problems with sysvol AD shared folder in a Samba 4.9.13 AD. Has been running smoothly until recently, and we don't know how to fix it. We detected the problem trying to create a new AD GPO, it fails with the message (sorry, we have windows in Spanish, it's not literal translation): "this security identifier cannot be assigned as object owner". If we execute

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > There is a limitation for containers regarding xattrs as I understand > it, so you may need to go to a full DC. ...googling around seems to me that are ''old limitation'', now gone. I've also hitted: https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/2015-November/012789.html so seems that

I cannot seem to probe any of the Python interpreter''s C functions on OS X. $ sudo dtrace -n ''pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry'' -c python dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry: probe description pid59706::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry does not match any probes These functions show up in ustack()s, but they do not appear to be available

hi again, now the join finished but ... i have a high CPU load caused by a samba-process. Samba is consuming 100% of one CPU and the replication fails. Is my AD to large???? root at dc2:# samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: e9d31c7e-acb3-4473-823a-39b06ab9fa95 DSA invocationId: 49a80da8-975f-49ef-834b-224b2bbf0805 ==== INBOUND

Hi Denis, yes, the problem initiated after changing the primary group of all my 11034 users. I changed the primary group to different groups. This caused that now every user is member of the LDAP object "Domain users" ldapsearch -LLL -x -h dc1 -x -b "cn=domain users,cn=users,dc=example,dc=net" member | grep ^member: | wc -l 11034 After this action the replication

Hi, the only thing i did, was to assign every user to a ohter group. After this i changed the primary group to this new groups and the samba-server itself assigned the users to the group "domain users"automatically (attribute: member). Now i try to revert this and to rechange the primary group to 513. So i can have again a Domain users object with small number of members. Thanx