similar to: Error Upgrading Schema

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Error Upgrading Schema"

2020 Nov 02
0
Error Upgrading Schema
Hello! I just upgraded from Samba v4.10.9 to v4.11.15. The upgrade seems to have gone smoothly. As part of major release maintenance, I ran the following command on my schema master DC: > samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I get the following output: > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using
2020 Sep 02
2
schemaupgrade
Hello: I need to update the samba schema when I run the command: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I have this error: Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff Patched Sch51.ldf using
2020 Sep 02
1
schemaupgrade
root at pdc1-samba:/opt/adprep# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$(echo "DC=$(hostname -d)" | sed 's/\./,DC=/g')" -s base objectVersion | grep 'objectVersion' | awk '{print $NF}' 30 The scheme that this domain: 30 because it was a migration from a 2003 server some time ago. I want to upgrade. Now Try this
2020 Nov 20
0
Error Upgrading Schema
Rowland, I had the same thought. When I do that and try again, I get this message: # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff Exception in patch: b'patching file Sch50.ldf\nHunk #2 succeeded at 209 (offset -35 lines).\n' b'patch: ****
2020 Nov 20
3
Error Upgrading Schema
On 20/11/2020 02:13, Matthew Delfino Samba List wrote: > Thank you, Andrew! > > This evening I attempted the upgrade. I first carefully commented out each of the attributes from the Schema-Updates.md file. I then saved the file and ran the following command, which gave me the subsequent output: > > (as root) > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily
2020 Nov 20
0
Error Upgrading Schema
Thank you, Andrew! This evening I attempted the upgrade. I first carefully commented out each of the attributes from the Schema-Updates.md file. I then saved the file and ran the following command, which gave me the subsequent output: (as root) # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using
2020 Nov 20
1
Error Upgrading Schema
On 20/11/2020 15:46, Matthew Delfino Samba List wrote: > Rowland, > > I had the same thought. When I do that and try again, I get this message: > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting > Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff > Exception in patch:
2020 Nov 18
2
Error Upgrading Schema
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 23:12 +0000, Matthew Delfino Samba List via samba wrote: > > There is only one thing that concerns me: One of the attributes > specified in the Samba script has a parameter whose value directly > contradicts the value specified in my old ldif file: > Well done with the analysis! > > In Samba script: > > dn:
2020 Nov 18
0
Error Upgrading Schema
Hello Rowland & Andrew, I did a careful analysis of what I had imported several years ago, and what I found in /usr/share/samba/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Schema-Updates.md and wanted to quickly run this by you before I attempted the upgrade. I appreciate the grace of your patience, as I am not a schema expert, so I may use incorrect terminology. I found the following attributes in the
2015 Dec 30
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Okay, I'm already riding the test base ... thank you Leveraging believe may be related, when access peo UDCA part of Domains Controller, I can think of error and logs appears: [12/30/2015 08: 55: 52.277383, 0] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb wrap.c: 72 (ldb wrap debug) ldb: acl_read: CN = DC-LINUX, OU = Domain Controllers, DC = Internal, DC = MYDOMAIN can not find attr [msDS-isRODC] in schema of It
2019 Sep 09
2
AD Schema Upgrade
Hi I wonder if anyone can help. I am trying to upgrade the schema version. Current environment: Two domain controllers both running samba 4.7.6 - Ubuntu package Version: objectVersion: 44 (server 2008) According to samba docs, 'samba-tool domain schemaupgrade' only works from 2008 R2 version 47. For earlier it says: 'the ldf files must be manually sourced from the
2015 Dec 30
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
OK, ii see this then thank you . Executed the process ldbadd / ldbmodify and me only generated an error ldbmodify -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '--option = DSDB: update schema allowed = true' sch40mod.ldf ERR: (Attribute or value exists) "attribute 'possSuperiors': value # 0 on 'CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = Internal, DC =
2015 Dec 30
2
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Ok it seems like you are in the exact same situation I was. So here are the files in a tgz. Once uncompressed, you'll have to change each occurance of "DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" according to your configuration. you can do this with something like : perl -pi -e 's/DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com/DC=Carlos,DC=com/g' * Then you will have to run ldbadd and ldbmodify in the correct order to upgrade
2015 Dec 30
0
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
Hello! Command output mainly seemed OK. ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = MYDOMAIN" -s base possSuperiors # 1 record dn: CN = msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases, CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = Internal, DC = MYDOMAIN possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nismap possSuperiors: container # Returned 1 records
2015 Dec 30
2
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
msDS-isRODC is introduced in version 32 of the schema. This is the problem I faced. You can have a look to https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-August/193258.html. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mail
2015 Aug 13
2
Samba 4 schema upgrade.
Hello, We achieved our Domain Migration from Windows 2003 R2 server to Samba 4.2.3 (sernet binaries). Now Samba 4 is the only domain controller. When we use ADUC and click on Domain Controllers we have an error. At the same time if we have a look at de syslog messages on the server, we can see "ldb: acl_read: CN=SERVER,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=DOMAIN,DC=com cannot find attr[msDS-isRODC] in
2018 Feb 13
0
Is it possible to lower the domain and forest functional level
I've found a solution. The samba ldap was missing 2 information to allow a windows 2008 R2 to join the domain as a secondary controller. Those informations were : CN=ActiveDirectoryUpdate,CN=ForestUpdates,cn=configuration,dc=yourdomain,dc=local with the attribute revision set to 5 and CN=ActiveDirectoryUpdate,CN=DomainUpdates,CN=System,dc=yourdomain,dc=local with the attribute revision set to
2019 Sep 10
0
AD Schema Upgrade
> Em 9 de set de 2019, ?(s) 11:39, Max Serafini via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > Hi > > I wonder if anyone can help. > > I am trying to upgrade the schema version. Current environment: > > Two domain controllers both running samba 4.7.6 - Ubuntu package > > Version: objectVersion: 44 (server 2008) > > According to samba docs,
2015 Dec 30
4
Was not found in the schema 'msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes'
You should run : ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base possSuperiors If the result is : # record 1 dn: CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=DEVINLECLECLERC,DC=com possSuperiors: container possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nisMap Then it's OK, the script tried to add a
2020 Nov 11
2
Error Upgrading Schema
On 10/11/2020 22:47, Matthew Delfino Samba List via samba wrote: > Andrew, > > I feel that it is your prerogative to determine how many odd possibilities you want your tools to account for, so that they might know what to do rather than exit with an error. You have a better sense for how likely it is that someone in the wild is altering their schema and might have changed an already