similar to: Active - Deactivating

Hi, I upgraded my Samba 4.5.16 installed (by apt-get) on Debian 9.9 to Samba 4.10 through the Van Belle repository (apt.van-belle.nl). apt-get install -t stretch-samba410 samba attr winbind libpam-winbind libnss-winbind libpam-krb5 krb5-config krb5-user bind9 ctdb ldb-tools smbldap-tools ufw glusterfs-common libcephfs1 The packages "bind9 ctdb ldb-tools smbldap-tools ufw glusterfs-common

Meny thanks for our fast answer ! root at AD:/source# cat /tmp/samba-debug-info.txt Collected config --- 2020-03-23-15:57 ----------- Hostname: AD DNS Domain: Caloro.m FQDN: AD.Caloro.m ipaddress: 192.168.1.7 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.Caloro.m record verified ok, sample output: Server: 192.168.1.9 Address: 192.168.1.9#53 _kerberos._tcp.caloro.m service = 0 0 88

Hello Samba Group Today installing the Samba Version 4.11.7-Debian pkg from Louis, Thanks Louis !! The Server will running but watching on the service i have DNS Problmes. Please can give me any update here : what are runing wrong. -- samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active:

Hey All, I don't know what's wrong, or what I may have done wrong, but I THOUGHT I followed all the correct steps to setup samba, and it's not working. Here's what I did: D/L latest samba code (4.13.1) & extract install dependencies ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-fhs (enable-fhs was required to get configure to run through completely) make make install cp

Hello. I'm trying to perform a classic upgrade from Samba 3.6.6 with LDAP backend on Debian to 4.1.6 on Ubuntu on a new machine. The samba-tools creates the following *smb.con*f: *# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf** *[global] workgroup = SOMEDOM realm = somedom.local netbios name = SOMEDOM server role = member server passdb backend = samba_dsdb server

Well, it almost went okay. Thumbnail: I had two DCs, running the latest in buster. I created a new one running bookworm and 4.21.3. I joined the new machine as a DC. I then transferred the FSMO roles from one of the old ones and demoted that one. My plan is to create a fourth new one and demote the other old one. But, two problems: 1. The dns on the new DC is not responding. It did

Your welkom Can you run this : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize where needed. That should tell use enough to see whats going on. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > mauri via samba > Verzonden: maandag 23 maart 2020 14:13 > Aan:

?Ok, so now : Content of /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.31.6.15 adc1.transmitcorp.com adc1 Now, stop samba. Cleanup current data and now setup samba and provision again. cleanup /var/lib/samba /var/cache/samba Rename smb.conf Then provision again, the base is wrong so the AD-DB has wrong data. > > I removed smb.conf from /etc/samba > un the interactive

Hello, Just completed a classic upgrade on a new server. NT4 style PDC was running 4.6.5, new server running 4.13.0 (Debian Buster compiled from source) Classic Upgrade process seemed to go fine with one caveat, not sure if it means anything - the wiki shows the upgrade process ending with: =========================== Commiting 'add users to groups' transaction to disk Setting password

Try this. systemctl stop smbd nmbd winbind systemctl disable smbd nmbd winbind systemctl mask smbd nmbd winbind systemctl unmask samba-ad-dc systemctl enable samba-ad-dc systemctl start samba-ad-dc Reboot server. Check again. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Lionel Monchecourt via samba

I upgraded one of my DCs from 4.19 to 4.20 using Michaels repository (http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba jammy/samba-4.20/), and the DC is now no longer responding. systemctl status samba-ad-dc returns: ? samba-ad-dc.service - LSB: Samba daemons for the AD DC Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/samba-ad-dc; generated) Active: active (exited) since Wed 2024-09-11 02:38:32 UTC; 3h 29min

From http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:upgrade-sama 4.20 has a new package samba-ad-dc (split from other binaries in previous versions) that provides DC functionality. Before 4.20, there is a meta-package with the same name that provides compatibility before the upgrade. It is recommended to install this meta package samba-ad-dc before upgrading to 4.20, so the upgrade has all its

Hello, today I upgraded one of my DCs to Ubuntu to 20.04.1. After that my DC did not work anymore, despite unmasking, reenabling. In /var/log/samba/log.samba I get the error messages below. Looks like libraries are missing. What shall I do? Thanks, Joachim root at cobra:/var/log/samba# cat log.samba [2020/10/11 15:12:51.009065, 0]

I keep getting errors in my logs about can not bind to address *.*.*.*:53 address in use.. what did i do wrong in the setup of my server or domain? attached logs and smb.conf along with the output from my provision command. Jeffrey D. Means meaje at meanspc.com Owner / CIO for MeansPC http://www.meanspc.com/ Custom Web Development For Your Needs. (970)308-1298 - The

On Wed, July 22, 2020 14:48, Rowland penny wrote: > On 22/07/2020 19:40, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> >> On Wed, July 22, 2020 12:35, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> FreeBSD-12.1p7 jail running Samba-4.10.15 on ZFS. >>> >>> When I run 'samba-tool domain backup offline targetdir=/tmp' I see this: >>> >>> running backup on dirs:

On 25/07/2019 17:52, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: > On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and >> 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory >> Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, >> Selinux, a firewall etc). Is

On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and > 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory > Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, > Selinux, a firewall etc). Is Samba actually running ? Are you using > Bind9, if so, is it running and set

Hi Louis, Hi Rowland, I will respond to both in this mail. Yes winbind is installed : [root at dmzrodc ~]# which winbindd /usr/sbin/winbindd [root at dmzrodc ~]# rpm -qa |grep winbind sernet-samba-winbind-4.8.2-10.el7.x86_64 I know about *mbd processes. so strange.. This is why I'm posting here :-) I joined the RODC following the procedure available on the wiki page

 If its really urgent then u would really suggest, invest in samba a bit and pay them to get this working. Thats what sernet can do for you. Get commercial support.   Im pretty much out of options, execpt upgrade to 4.8 and try it again.     Greetz,   Louis     Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mailto:gslongo at it-optics.com] Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 10:40 Aan: Rowland Penny; L.P.H. van Belle

On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:26:21 +0100 Andrea Venturoli via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > On several FreeBSD 11.2/amd64 servers, I've got a jail dedicated to > running Samba as an AD DC. > > Some days ago I upgraded one of them from 4.8.7 to 4.8.9 and suddenly > everything stopped working. > Since it was a production box, I immediately