similar to: Samba as AD member & without winbind...

Am 30.10.20 um 10:57 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 30/10/2020 09:20, Thomas Besser via samba wrote: >> actually we have running samba 4.5.16 under Devuan 2.0 (Ascii) as AD >> member without winbind configured. UID and GID informations coming >> from NSS (nslcd -> LDAP). LDAP and AD are in sync. > So you will have uidNumber and gidNumber attributes in AD. No, AD

Am 30.10.20 um 11:30 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 30/10/2020 10:09, Thomas Besser via samba wrote: >> Am 30.10.20 um 10:57 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >>> On 30/10/2020 09:20, Thomas Besser via samba wrote: >>>> actually we have running samba 4.5.16 under Devuan 2.0 (Ascii) as AD >>>> member without winbind configured. UID and GID

Hello, I have configured an samba AD DC for use with some windows and linux machines. The linux machines use samba for user auth and also as kerberos kdc for nfs mounts. This works fine so far but after a while the user can not access the nfs shares anymore. I tried to analyze the problem and finally found, that the obtaining a ticket for nfs service failes in this case because of a wrong

On 30/10/2020 11:20, Ralph Boehme wrote: > Am 10/30/20 um 12:11 PM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 30/10/2020 11:06, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >>> Am 10/30/20 um 10:20 AM schrieb Thomas Besser via samba: >>>> Can I configure winbind to use 'local' users and groups from NSS? >>> there's idmap_nss that may work for you. >>>

On 30/10/2020 09:20, Thomas Besser via samba wrote: > Hi all, without winbind co > > actually we have running samba 4.5.16 under Devuan 2.0 (Ascii) as AD > member without winbind configured. UID and GID informations coming > from NSS (nslcd -> LDAP). LDAP and AD are in sync. So you will have uidNumber and gidNumber attributes in AD. > > After upgrade to Devuan 3.0

Hi (Stephan?), is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of a redirected mail or simply a bug ? A sends mail to B, B redirects to C C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces for various reasons it goes back to B and A will never know about this. I thick this is came

Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:07:06 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 15/07/2020 15:44, RhineDevil wrote: > > Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:23:41 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 15/07/2020 14:56, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:56:48 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >

On 06/05/2017 11:05 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > I have updated my dovecot proxy servers from 2.2.28 to 2.2.30. Since the upgrade I'm having the error: > > Jun 5 10:54:51 musio12 dovecot: auth: Fatal: master: service(auth): child 63632 killed with signal 11 (core not dumped) > > Me too, with # 2.2.30.1 (eebd877): /opt/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole

On 30/10/2020 11:06, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 10/30/20 um 10:20 AM schrieb Thomas Besser via samba: >> Can I configure winbind to use 'local' users and groups from NSS? > there's idmap_nss that may work for you. > > -slow Already mentioned that, problem is it is an allocating backend, unless I am reading the manpage wrong. Rowland

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:00:20AM +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 10/11/2019 10:49, andi via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have configured an samba AD DC for use with > > some windows and linux machines. The linux machines use > > samba for user auth and also as kerberos kdc for > > nfs mounts. This works fine so far but after a while >

Hello everybody, since now I did no replication and spam is delivered into users folder "spambox" Every night there is a cronjob which deletes spam older than 30 days via something like "find .... -ctime +30 -delete" Now I'm going to set up replication (two way) and I thought that doing "rm" is not a good idea. So I modified the job to something like

OK, I found a solution: trusted_users = exim:dovecot in my exim.conf fixed it. Anyway this is an important change of behavour between 2.2 und 2.3 In 2.2 the "dovecot" under exims "trusted_users" was not necessary. Olaf On 04/20/2018 02:53 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3

Hello, I tried to use the new autoexpunge for my Trash folders I had in 15-mailboxes.conf mailbox Trash { special_use = \Trash auto = subscribe } (dovecot -n of the original config is below) and added just the line autoexpunge = 1h Just a short period on my test system. But it failed. In the log I see Dec 18 10:54:07 irams2 dovecot: imap(ms2test): Error: Failed to autoexpunge

On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge .... </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div>

Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote: > And I have a new one just for "unknown user" and here my bantime and findtime > are much bigger and the retries are just '2'. So here I'm much harsher. > I'll keep an eye on my logs and maybe some more twaeking is necessary. Just be careful about typos (like twaeking!): users could simply misspell their username,

On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hi (Stephan?), > is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of > a redirected mail or simply a bug ? > > A sends mail to B, B redirects to C > C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. > It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces > for various

On 04/23/2018 03:46 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >>> Hi (Stephan?), >>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >>> >>> A sends

Nobody ? :-( On 3/30/20 5:26 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hello everybody, > since now I did no replication and spam is delivered into users folder "spambox" > Every night there is a cronjob which deletes spam older than 30 days via something like > ????"find .... -ctime +30 -delete" > Now I'm going to set up replication (two way) and I thought that > doing

Hi Aki, On 4/4/20 8:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge .... mail_debug=yes is on on both ends and dovecot was restarted but anyway nothing is logged when I issue "doveadm -Dv expunge " In the shell where I issue the "expunge" I see the following: # /usr/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge