similar to: samba ad errors in log

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "samba ad errors in log"

2020 Oct 24
0
samba ad errors in log
On 24/10/2020 15:44, Sonic via samba wrote: > I'm seeing a lot of these errors from a Samba 4.13.0 DC running on > Debian Buster, the smb.conf is untouched from that which was created > via a classic upgrade. > =============================== > Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: [2020/10/24 10:25:43.886363, 0] > ../../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:352(samba_runcmd_io_handler)
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
GPO's fail to apply on Windows clients and sysvol permission errors are logged. DC is Samba 4.13.0 created via a classic upgrade. Logged sysvol errors (uid 5025 is the system I ran gpupdate on, don't know what uid 3000011 refers to): =================================== Oct 25 12:17:09 srvr01 smbd[3762]: [2020/10/25 12:17:09.695062, 0]
2020 Oct 24
2
samba ad errors in log
On 24/10/2020 18:05, Sonic wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:46 PM Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Who is user '5035' ? >> No clue, all users have a uidNumber in 1000-1999 with all sids ending >> in 2000-2999. > Sorry that was from the AD side, the same client with the > 192.168.7.176 address has a local unix uid of 5035 - I have not yet
2020 Oct 13
2
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
Hi Samba Team! It's me again I'm having some issues with gpo's and sysvol access. I've installed samba 4.12.7. using idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 When I tried to create a gpo using the rsat tools I got a Permission Denied error. Among other things, I have run: samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset Also I added to smb.conf acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes in sysvol and netlogon sections. I
2024 Jan 11
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
Hello, Issue Description After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) access to shares stops working. Error Summary: [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992, effective(1278739538, 1278738945), real(1278739538, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) chdir_current_service:
2024 Feb 21
1
Cant access home folder after 4.13.x
Hi I've been using Samba from pkgsrc successfully on Illumos, SmartOS specifically until I moved to 4.17.11. When I try to access my home folder on Linux I get, chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/home/fukr/kev) failed: Permission denied. Current token: uid=10000, gid=10001, 3 groups: 10001 10000 10002 My home folder permissions are 700. If I change to 755 it works fine. My the uid, gid are,
2024 Feb 21
1
Cant access home folder after 4.13.x
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:09:04 +0000 evil cRaftKnife via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi > > I've been using Samba from pkgsrc successfully on Illumos, SmartOS > specifically until I moved to 4.17.11. When I try to access my home > folder on Linux I get, > > chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/home/fukr/kev) failed: Permission > denied. Current token:
2023 Jan 31
2
Log errors on domain member
Hi folks, The smb.conf and other information after specification of the problems. The journal on a AD domain member server is cluttered with permission denied entries of this message pair: Jan 31 07:02:26 konsrvfast smbd[436004]: [2023/01/31 07:02:26.083500,? 0, effective(11025, 10515), real(11025, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) Jan 31
2024 Jan 11
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,
2023 Jan 31
1
Log errors on domain member
On 31/01/2023 06:59, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi folks, > > The smb.conf and other information after specification of the problems. > > The journal on a AD domain member server is cluttered with permission > denied entries of this message pair: > > ?? Jan 31 07:02:26 konsrvfast smbd[436004]: [2023/01/31 > ?? 07:02:26.083500,? 0, effective(11025, 10515),
2024 Jan 26
1
permission denied with windows acls
On 1/26/24 09:34, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 1/26/24 02:35, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba >> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> The share mounts and I am a member of the correct groups >>> CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ cat /etc/fstab //fs.carlson.lab/test >>> /mnt/test
2024 Jan 26
1
permission denied with windows acls
On 1/26/24 02:35, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:45:52 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> The share mounts and I am a member of the correct groups >> CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ cat /etc/fstab //fs.carlson.lab/test /mnt/test >> cifs credentials=/root/smbcreds,multiuser,sec=ntlmssp,_netdev 0 0 > I think
2024 Jan 25
1
Share access permission errors after upgrade from 4.12.14
On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing
2018 Oct 31
2
classicupgrade
Hello at all after a classicupgrade from samba 3.6 to samba 4.9.1 at first tests i found many error in log.smbd like these : [2018/10/31 15:26:51.317398,  0] ../source3/smbd/uid.c:386(change_to_user_internal)   change_to_user_internal: chdir_current_service() failed! [2018/10/31 15:26:51.317567,  0] ../source3/smbd/process.c:1627(switch_message)   Error: Could not change to user. Removing
2024 Feb 01
1
Samba omitting the user group setting, might be a bug
Hello, I am experiencing a strange behaviour that I think might be a bug. I was advised to consult the mailing list instead of trying to file a bug, so here it is. I have a user `kate` which is both a member of a `family` group and a `feddkate` group. There is a share called `FeddAndKate` which I what to be accessible to the `feddkate` group but not to a `family` group, and I've set up
2020 May 04
3
Access Denied to Netlogon Share on secondary DC
Hello $list, i can't access the netlogon share on the second dc. I got this error: Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.035964, 0] ../../source3/smbd/uid.c:448(change_to_user_internal) Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: change_to_user_internal: chdir_current_service() failed! Mai 04 22:13:53 dc02 smbd[3321]: [2020/05/04 22:13:53.037230, 0]
2020 May 08
1
Only domain admins can access shares
I've set up a single server with a DC and fileserver. I've read through all docs and the warnings on the wiki (VERY well done, many thanks to all the contributors) more than once so I hope I haven't missed anything. smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] netbios name = FILESERVER realm = WDC.DOMAIN.IT server role = active directory domain controller
2020 Oct 13
0
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
On 13/10/2020 19:24, Franco Suarez via samba wrote: > Hi Samba Team! > > It's me again I'm having some issues with gpo's and sysvol access. Strange as it might seem, I do not remember you :-) > > I've installed samba 4.12.7. using idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 Yes, but what on and how ? > > When I tried to create a gpo using the rsat tools I got a Permission Denied
2020 Oct 13
2
Samba Sysvol and GPO Issues
Hi Rowland. I'm using CentOS 8.2.2004 The Samba is compiled from sources, it's the only DC and I'm not using it as a fileserver. # Global parameters [global] dns forwarder = 10.30.251.70 netbios name = SAMBA4-01 realm = LARRY.LAN server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = LARRY idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes [sysvol]
2020 Oct 24
4
samba ad errors in log
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:13 AM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > denied access to sysvol and a client is being denied updating its record. > > Does the DC use itself as the first nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf ? Same issue whether or not I point to itself first or to the local cache. > Who is user '5035' ? No clue, all users have a uidNumber