similar to: 32bit DC for 64bit machines?

On 10/12/2020 7:28 PM, Gedalya wrote: > On 10/13/20 8:49 AM, Dan Egli wrote: >> >> I'm quite new to Dovecot, so forgive me if this is a simple question. >> I've got rspamd running, and it's rewriting the subject of many >> messages as spam even when they are not. I've moved things out of the >> spam folder, which I was under the impression would

On 22/10/2020 19:42, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > Question, > > ??? Since a samba DC's main purpose is simply user authentication, is > there any kind of problem with having a 32bit DC managing things for a > 64bit domain? I need to share files and printers on the domain I'm > setting up, and I've read all the warnings about having a separate DC > vs. file/print

On 05/02/2020 10:33, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > >> I didn't bother checking, I can cause the panic just by editing >> smb.conf, adding the two lines in question and then >> restarting Samba. I >> do this over SSH, so presumably the network is up on eth0 ;-) > Ah, ok, so we clearly have bug in samba??? > But i dont see this one on Debian Buster

On Jul 13, 2014, at 9:46 AM, pere at riusnebot.com wrote: > Dear Charles Lepple, > Sorry for my email intrusion. for next time: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser > I have an UPS called Ovislink 1000VA and it use a UPSMART2000R (with ?ATCL FOR UPS?). > I?m a beginner Linux user and I ?will install your new driver <nutdrv_atcl_usb > to work

> > I'm looking for some general advice. > > > > I'm beginning to set up a Raspberry Pi 4 as a SOHO server with Samba on Raspbian Buster. > > > > I will be running as a member of an existing Windows AD (JOIN), then allow logging in from > > Windows and Linux clients. > > Do you mean as a Unix domain member or as an AD DC ? > > This is a

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with

I am experiencing a weird issue with samba when I am trying to configure it as a Domain Controller. I'm using Gentoo Linux, and after finally figuring that kdb5_util was looking for the krb5.conf file where Gentoo didn't put it, I was able to initialize the realm with kdb5_util create. But now when I try to start samba (the actual Samba process, not smb) it pulls kerberos and kerberos

Thanks for your help. I followed your suggestions and I'm getting basically the same thing. I used your suggested smb.conf and created /home/pishare: <mypi>:/ $ ls -l -d /home/pishare drwxrwsr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 7 12:17 /home/pishare "pi" is a Unix and a Samba user. Attempting to logon from Win 10 gives the same error messages. Testing the connection as suggested in

Is there a version of Samba that will run on a Raspberry Pi 2? If so, can somebody point me to it? If not can, Samba be compiled on a Raspberry Pi 2? Thanks for your help. -- Paul (ganci at nurdog.com) Cell: (303)257-5208

I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, > = in smbclient) $ mkdir ~dan/test1 $ chmod 700 ~dan/test1 $ smbclient -U dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test1.txt (failure, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) > quit

On 10/29/2020 2:22 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 29/10/2020 00:41, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> I am experiencing a weird issue with samba when I am trying to configure >> it as a Domain Controller. > You would :-) Gee, thanks! :) >> >> After looking on the internet I see people getting this error before >> krb5_util create, but not after. I tried

Good Morning, I am working on setting up a 12V DC UPS that will power a NAS and a router for a few hours. It contains some lithium-ion batteries, and a BMS to control charging. Since it is just a dumb box with batteries, it has no intelligence to inform the NAS of its status. This is where NUT comes in... I would like to incorporate a Raspberry Pi NUT server into this scheme. The Rpi can

On 10/27/2020 12:50 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/10/2020 18:35, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server >> the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in >> my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, >>> = in smbclient) >> $

Dear Charles, Thanks for your quick reply, but I can't install nut_2.7.2 in my raspberry. 1) I create a [nut] directory and use wget to download three files: [nut_2.7.2-1.dsc] [nut_2.7.2.orig.tar.gz] [nut_2.7.2-1.debian.tar.xz] 2)I unpack: dpkg-source -x nut_2.7.2-1.dsc 3) I use command root at pi1:/nut/nut-2.7.2# debuild -us -uc . .. And I have the following error code:

I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin and never standby: root at rpi:~# pidstat -dl 20 Linux 4.4.50-v7+ (localhost) 11/07/2018 _armv7l_ (4 CPU) 04:10:08 AM UID PID kB_rd/s kB_wr/s kB_ccwr/s iodelay Command 04:10:28 AM

llvm-toolchain-3.8 seems to have problems on debian armel and raspbian. On raspbian it builds but our armv7 contamination checker blocked it from entering the repo. Further investigation showed that "compiler-rt" was being built with -march=armv7 . I was able to remove the -march with some build-system hacker but then I got a failure on

I am not a Linux Guru, so I just learned how to configure dhcpd5 to using static address instead of uninstalling. To avoid any potential problems. It looks the opposite :-). In "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf" is a line "// If you are just adding zones, please do that in /etc/bind/named.conf.local". I do not use it, I estimate the zone will add samba provisioning. I

Hello, I've having recurring issues with the second DC in my Samba AD domain. I've demoted/removed the second DC a number of times and re-provisioned it. It'll work for a bit and then replication breaks. Since replication is broken I've been doing the following to remove it: DC-02 systemctl stop samba systemctl disable samba DC-01 samba-tool domain demote

I have two DC's. One on an Intel based box and the other on a Raspberry Pi (2B?) both using Louis' repos running Samba 4.12.3. In comparing "samba-debug-info.txt" (generated by Louis' "samba-collect-debug-info.sh" script) I see that the RPi /etc/nsswitch.conf (file) does NOT include /systemd/ in the 'passwd' & 'group' lines like the Intel

Hi, -j 1 did not help here, still that big number of "invalid string offset" messages. Is it the same on your end? @Rowland: same with you? I can work around by compiling on and using native Debian Buster 64bittish aarch64, based on https://people.debian.org/~gwolf/raspberrypi3/20190628/ , but I prefer to stay on Raspbian if possible. Regards, Norbert On 21.10.2019 13:11, L.P.H.