similar to: samba start issues after classic upgrade

Your welkom Can you run this : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize where needed. That should tell use enough to see whats going on. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > mauri via samba > Verzonden: maandag 23 maart 2020 14:13 > Aan:

Meny thanks for our fast answer ! root at AD:/source# cat /tmp/samba-debug-info.txt Collected config --- 2020-03-23-15:57 ----------- Hostname: AD DNS Domain: Caloro.m FQDN: AD.Caloro.m ipaddress: 192.168.1.7 ----------- Kerberos SRV _kerberos._tcp.Caloro.m record verified ok, sample output: Server: 192.168.1.9 Address: 192.168.1.9#53 _kerberos._tcp.caloro.m service = 0 0 88

Hello Samba Group Today installing the Samba Version 4.11.7-Debian pkg from Louis, Thanks Louis !! The Server will running but watching on the service i have DNS Problmes. Please can give me any update here : what are runing wrong. -- samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active:

No installed Debian 10.6, running local Bind9 Server, and krb5-kdc.service Running fine. Installing the Louse package ?samba 2:4.13.1+dfsg-0.1buster1? root at AD:/etc/init.d# systemctl status samba-ad-dc ? samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: deactivating (stop-sigterm) (Result:

Hi, Now, my functional level is 2008_R2. samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=empres,DC=com,DC=br' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 Everything looks fine, the replication, the consistency between the DCs, however I have checked this information in

Hi, Not sure sernet can help. It really looks like a samba issue to me..? Just found this in logs when starting the RODC : [2018/06/13 10:59:11.546077, 3, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:291(samba_runcmd_io_handler) samba_runcmd_io_handler: Child /usr/sbin/winbindd exited 1 [2018/06/13 10:59:11.546131, 0, pid=12673, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)]

I have installed and configured a Samba version 4.9.4 first in forest AD DC on a clean, updated installation of Ubuntu 18.04 running BIND 9.11.3-1ubuntu1.3-Ubuntu ... built by make with ... '--with-gssapi=/usr' ...  '--sysconfdir=/etc' ... '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' .... I am following the Samba Wiki for guidiance. The installation proceeded without error in all tests until I

On 25/07/2019 17:52, Robert A Wooldridge via samba wrote: > On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and >> 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory >> Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, >> Selinux, a firewall etc). Is

On 07/25/2019 11:35 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Well, 'WERR' is short for 'Windows Error' (I think) and > 'DNS_ERROR_DS_UNAVAILABLE' is supposed to mean that the Directory > Service is unavailable. Is something getting in the way (Apparmor, > Selinux, a firewall etc). Is Samba actually running ? Are you using > Bind9, if so, is it running and set

Hi Louis, Hi Rowland, I will respond to both in this mail. Yes winbind is installed : [root at dmzrodc ~]# which winbindd /usr/sbin/winbindd [root at dmzrodc ~]# rpm -qa |grep winbind sernet-samba-winbind-4.8.2-10.el7.x86_64 I know about *mbd processes. so strange.. This is why I'm posting here :-) I joined the RODC following the procedure available on the wiki page

 If its really urgent then u would really suggest, invest in samba a bit and pay them to get this working. Thats what sernet can do for you. Get commercial support.   Im pretty much out of options, execpt upgrade to 4.8 and try it again.     Greetz,   Louis     Van: Gaetan SLONGO [mailto:gslongo at it-optics.com] Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 10:40 Aan: Rowland Penny; L.P.H. van Belle

Hi I disabled even the windows server firewall to see if this is what it was blocking, but it didn't solve it. There appear to be Kerberos key errors, but the kinit administrator command works correctly. /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate:; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Regards, M?rcio Bacci Em sex, 2 de ago de 2019 ?s 15:51, Marcio Demetrio Bacci < marciobacci at gmail.com>

Hello, samba team. I provisioned Samba 4.8 wich compiled from sources as DC with --use-rfc2307 parameters. It is fresh installation of Domain controller. All functions are working, but i can not enable (apply group policies = yes) parameter,to provide Default Domain Password policies from GPO. That I did wrong? Thank you. root at dc4samba:~# cat /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf # Global parameters

Hi I believe I am having DNS upgrade issues, as noticed below: /etc/init.d/samba-ad-dc status ? samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2019-08-02 10:04:24 -03; 5h 20min ago Docs: man:samba(8) man:samba(7) man:smb.conf(5) Main PID: 9284

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:05:23 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > Same, as said; winbind isn't started :-) > > > > [root at dmzrodc ~]# ps ax | egrep "ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd" > 650 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -u ntp:ntp -g > 1205 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba -D > 1225 ? S 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba

On 4/19/2016 3:39 PM, Thomas Smith wrote: > Here's what I get at level 0 right after stopping/starting Samba: > > [2016/04/19 12:27:06.043469, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c:372(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.3.8-Ubuntu started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2015 > [2016/04/19 12:27:06.157629, 0] >

Am 23.07.2018 um 23:27 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:09:58 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 19.07.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:33:46 +0200 >>> Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 19.07.2018 um

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:09:58 +0200 Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 19.07.2018 um 17:50 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:33:46 +0200 > > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Am 19.07.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:21:41

It was my understanding that winbind wasn't necessary for Samba4. This server has been running for months without it. Sanatized smb.conf: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DCS realm = DCS.LOCAL netbios name = SERVER server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes debug level =

Ok, thank you--that worked, but it doesn't make sense. The server's been operational for months without winbind. Did something change in Samba that it won't operate now without it? I specifically remember reading that winbind wasn't necessary and, in fact, wasn't recommended with Samba 4 AD. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:27 PM Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: