similar to: Home folder permissions disappear sometimes

Ok, I see. Does the gotcha mean that users will receive new UIDs/GIDs and that I will have to chown files/folders and set new ACLs, or will those bits "just work"? Oleg On 2020-10-15 16:21, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 15/10/2020 14:36, Oleg Blyahher wrote: >> Thanks for the quick response. >> >> Would the following be a reasonable way of solving this on a

Hi everyone, I'm running Samba 4.7.6 on Ubuntu 18.04. I have an issue with adding users to groups with samba-tool, not really sure where to look for more info. samba -i didn't show anything at all. This is what I do: *samba-tool group add new-group** **samba-tool group addmembers new-group my-user* if I run *id my-user *or *groups my-user*, then the group *new-group *does not appear

Thank you so much for the prompt response and the valuable comments. We are using a pretty much unmodified Zentyal installation, which in its own turn sets everything up for a Samba DC. It might be a good idea for us to move away from that, if Zentyal uses an EOL-version of Samba.. You were absolutely right about the sign-in part! Almost all of us work from home in these special days, so

Hi there, I'm trying to get FreeRADIUS to authenticate against my Samba DC. It's Samba 4.7.6-ubuntu running on Ubuntu 18 (kernel version 4.15.0-66-generic). It came nicely packaged with Zentyal, which provides a nice GUI for managing a domain, as well as a CA and lots of cool small features. That same Zentyal also includes support for FreeRADIUS (3.0.16). This is my smb.conf:

Il 07/02/2016 18:33, Nizar Armansyah ha scritto: > This tutorial uses Sernet Samba: > http://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=CentOS_7&p=samba&f=4 > > This one done by compiling Samba yourself: > https://imanudin.net/2014/11/16/how-to-install-samba4-active-directory-on-centos-7-part-1/ >

Rowland, Thank you, I'll try to implement your suggestions. But it definitely worked without winbind. On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:11:47 +0200 > "linux.il" <linux.il at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> - There have been no configuration changes to the system > >

Hello, i installed zfs-auto-snapshot with Samba/Windows Shadow Copy. If the share contains "path = /srv/userdata/" it runs for me. But if I use "path = /srv/userdata/%U" I get no "Previous Versions" on my Win10 Client. I think the problem is the variable "shadow: snapdir = .zfs/snapshot". I tried with "shadow: snapdir = ../.zfs/snapshot" and

Hi all, Configuration information right off the bat: Debian Buster 10.5 and Samba 2:4.9.5+dfsg-5+deb10u1. Testparm is at the bottom I'm running into some interesting behavior on a server I've configured to use SSSD to bind to the AD domain. I've successfully bound using "net ads" and can get tickets and so on, and have samba configured to use kerberos through sssd.

On 3/20/19 9:40 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:22:36 +0200 > "linux.il via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Rowland, >> Thank you, I'll try to implement your suggestions. >> But it definitely worked without winbind. >> >> Then your 'Samba' problem isn't a Samba problem :-) >> >>

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 03/09/2020 21:15, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > >>> > >>> There is an sssd provided idmapper (on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora) it is > >>> packaged

After upgrading Samba server from 4.9 to 4.10 version running on RHEL 7.7 OS, something changed in how Windows clients see the file ownership on the exported shares. Instead of SID owners, it now shows "Unix User\username" and "Unix group\groupname" users. This works fine in all the cases except when Samba share is used for storing Windows user profiles. The workaround

On 24/07/2020 12:35, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > I can't say much about the NFS part here. However, my laptop uses SSSD > as client software and I mount our Samba shares via pam_mount and > kerberos. This all works fine. So I suspect that this should also work > with NFS. The IDs of your users need to be the same as on the server > otherwise I haven't found a

> > No, you only thought it worked using sssd on 4.8.x & 4.9.x, but it > didn't work correctly. > Maybe, but it "worked". Can we speculate what change in 4.10.x prompted Samba to export "Unix user\username" type of ownership to Windows clients instead of SID? Is there any option to revert to previous "wrong" behavior as a temporary workaround?

Like so many others, I'm having NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE issues. I've tried all the fixes I could find to no avail. My environment: Cent 7 (Linux 4.19.72-v7l.1.el7) with Samba 4.9.1, bound to AD via Realmd. SSSD for ACL's, winbind for user map. Installed packages: nano, ntpdate, ntp, realmd, sssd, sssd-tools, sssd-winbind-idmap, samba-winbind, adcli, oddjob, oddjob-mkhomedir,

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 06:43:32PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 03/09/2020 18:04, Johan Hattne via samba wrote: > > Dear all; > > > > Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have > > Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults?? I was > > convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago,

On 03/09/2020 20:01, Andrew Walker wrote: > Whoops, fumbled my response a bit. slice size by default is 200,000, > and to clarify the SID passed into murmur3() is the domain SID, not > SID?of individual user. Though, manpage for sssd-ad should be > consulted for precise details. My understanding though is as long as > everything fits in one slice, then you can just use RID. If

On 15/05/2020 14:56, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 5/15/20 12:56 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 14/05/2020 21:59, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote: >>> Sorry, I thought I had re-enabled delivery, but I had not.? So >>> trying to reply >>> to Rowland Penny here: >>> >>>> On 14/05/2020 18:46, Orion Poplawski via samba wrote:

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:00:20AM +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 10/11/2019 10:49, andi via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have configured an samba AD DC for use with > > some windows and linux machines. The linux machines use > > samba for user auth and also as kerberos kdc for > > nfs mounts. This works fine so far but after a while >

On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On

Hi Rowland, On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:37 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I am sorry but you seem to be asking on the wrong list, you appear to be > using sssd (which isn't supported with Samba from 4.8.0), Samba isn't > doing the authentication. > What part of my problem description, or which log entries make you think I am using