similar to: BIND9 failing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "BIND9 failing"

2020 Oct 12
1
BIND9 failing
Forgot this one. systemctl edit bind9 #/etc/systemd/system/bind9.service.d/override.conf is created. # add below. [Service] # Disable reloading completely. ExecReload= # Or set it to restart #ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc restart Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba >
2020 Jul 10
1
DNS issues on both DC's
I am having dns issues on both DC's. root at dc1:~# ./samba-setup-checkup.sh Check hostnames : Ok ./samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 91: [: too many arguments Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway Ping gateway ip : 192.168.0.106 : Ok Warning, no ping to gateway, this might be firewalled. check you internet connection, subdom DNS might need it. ping nameserver1:
2018 Mar 13
1
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Hai Baptiste, You missed my first message but here it is again. . systemctl cat bind9 # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service [Unit] Description=BIND Domain Name Server Documentation=man:named(8) After=network.target Wants=nss-lookup.target Before=nss-lookup.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=/etc/default/bind9 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -f $OPTIONS ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc reload
2018 Mar 13
1
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Sorry, Louis, not all of us use systemd. > Almost Harry... > > For debian Stretch. # cat /etc/debian_version buster/sid # cat /proc/1/cmdline /sbin/init You see: good old init. Just a test machine for a scheduled upgrade. > systemctl cat bind9 > # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service > [Unit] > Description=BIND Domain Name Server > Documentation=man:named(8) >
2017 Nov 10
3
Some strange errors in logs
Hai, cat "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf" also please. And check if the correct bind9_dlz is enabled. dpkg -l | grep bind9 Jessie, should be 9.9 Stretch should be 9.10 If this server was upgraded then you need to manualy adjust the file above. Looks to my bind9-dlz is enable in smb.conf but not loaded. cat /var/log/daemon.log | grep dlz You should see thing like: samba_dlz:
2016 Apr 13
1
[Fwd: Re: Samba_dlz, dhcp y zona inversa no actualiza]
>> what is in '/usr/bin/dhcpd-update-samba-dns.sh' ? # will receive addresses from this DHCP server. Instructions are found here: # https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samba_4_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#DHCP sleep 5 checkvalues() { [ -z "${2}" ] && echo "Error: argument '${1}' requires a parameter." && exit 1 case ${2} in -*) echo
2019 Jan 30
4
preparing a 2nd DC
greetings, samba-users, I am currently preparing to join a second Samba-DC to a Samba-based ADS. DC1 is a debian-9.6 machine, running samba-4.8.8 from Louis' repos. DC2 is basically identically set up (thank you, ansible) and I read and followed (1) so far, except the actual join. sysvol-rsync, kerberos ticket, modified smb.conf, resolv.conf ... done I assume 4.8.8 will give me no
2020 Apr 30
7
bind9 refuses to start -> zone has no NS records
Hi, I have to add a second DC to a Zone. I use the sernet packages Version 4.11 on a debian 10 host. The bind refuses to start: root at addc-zone02:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2020-04-30 14:51:58 EEST; 5s ago Docs:
2017 Nov 10
1
Some strange errors in logs
+1 "penny" :-) :-) for my thoughts.. :-p But yes, that should fix it. I also suggest, review your logs, you wil notice more messages. Rsyslog/apt/snmp/postfix/ntp need manual changes after the upgrade. At least these, maybe more but these are the one i've encountered. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at
2018 Mar 12
9
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper
2017 Oct 07
2
bind9 and isc-dhcp-Server for dynamic DNS-updates Error
This is my named.conf options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; notify no; empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; listen-on-v6 { none; }; forwarders { 192.168.10.3; 10.0.0.3; }; allow-query { 127.0.0.1/32; 192.168.16.0/24; }; allow-recursion { 127.0.0.1/32;
2016 Jul 18
3
samba 4.4.5 DC with bind9: DNS update failing with NOTAUTH
On 18.07.2016 22:48, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >>>> both with
2015 Mar 26
2
Bind9 Flat to Bind9 DLZ
yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2
2018 Jun 08
1
Problem with named.service
Good Afternoon! First I'm sorry for my last mail, and my english is not good. What OS? Centos 7.5 Samba Version? Version 4.7.0pre1-GIT-1c4b15a Bind Version? Name        : bind Arch        : x86_64 Epoch       : 32 Version     : 9.9.4 Release     : 61.el7 Size        : 4.3 M
2019 May 06
1
Possibly WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED or NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO
Hai, In addition to Rowlands last mail. I see wrong rights in /var/lib/samba/private You want : drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 May 6 13:06 private Missing bind (named.conf.option) In options { empty-zones-enable no; auth-nxdomain yes; # This server IS authorive for the AD-DC zones. // to use new samba backup onnline tool, you also need auth-nxdomain yes; //
2018 Dec 21
1
Samba AD DC replication error - 2, 'WERR_BADFILE'
Ok, some more resolving things to fix.   On both DC's few things to edit. In resolv.conf, the order is important here and dont point to nameserver 127.0.0.1 for the DC's.   DC1. file: /etc/resolv.conf  search example.corp nameserver IP_DC1 nameserver IP_DC2 nameserver 8.8.4.4 /etc/hosts IP_DC1 hostname.internal.example.com hostname IP_DC2 hostname.internal.example.com hostname     
2018 Jun 09
3
Problem with named.service
Good morning! I followed your instructions Rowland, but still showme the same error: I change this lines in smb.conf: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, dns For this one: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service●
2012 Jul 09
3
Samba4 and Bind9
CentOS 6.2, Samba 4.0.0beta3, Bind 9.9.1-P1. I have a workking Bind9 installation which includes several different zone files. Foward and reverse lookups work fine. When I include include "/usr/local/samba4/private/named.conf"; in the named.conf, named will no longer start: Jul 9 15:01:47 s6a named[9857]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=test,DC=cornell,DC=edu Jul 9 15:01:47 s6a
2018 Oct 15
1
bind9 and samba 4.9.1
Hello, I have the following problem with my bind9 together with samba 4.9 SerNet. If I start the bind9 I got the following error-message: --------------- Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=zfd,DC=forumzfd,DC=de Oct 15 20:35:50 addc2 named[2269]: samba_dlz: starting configure Oct 15
2016 Jun 05
2
inconsistent DNS information, windows domain member issues..
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Rowland penny [mailto:rpenny at samba.org] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 17:46 > An: Jo <j.o.l at live.com> > Cc: 'samba' <samba at lists.samba.org> > Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] inconsistent DNS information, windows domain > member issues.. > > On 05/06/16 13:43, Jo wrote: > >> Your DCs really