Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Bind9 issue"
2020 Sep 30
6
Bind9 issue
Rowland,
To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *.
example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address.
Both bind9 and samba are running.
Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first.
Louis, your answer in a few minutes.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at
2020 Oct 01
1
Bind9 issue
Hi Bob,
?
Ok, things are looking ok again?
dpkg-reconfiure krb5.conf , doesnt do much expect installing and configuringing krb5.conf which basicly only sets the REALM.?
"init administrator" will not connect to kerberos?
If the DNS isnt running, its unable to resolv the servernames for the REALM.
Resulting in, you not able to kinit.
?
Greetz,
?
Louis
?
?
Van: Robert Wooden
2020 Sep 30
0
Bind9 issue
On 30/09/2020 13:22, Robert Wooden via samba wrote:
> Yesterday I had an issue with Samba v 4.13.0.
>
> I cannot figure out why bind9 will not "host -t SRV _ldap._
> tcp.ad.dtntwk.work." or "host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.ad.dtntwk.work."
>
> root at dc1:~# host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.subdom.example.com.
Hmm, is 'subdom.example.com' really
2020 Sep 30
0
Bind9 issue
Bind_DLZ is not loaded
Which makes sence if we see the errors..
Verify if this is loaded..
I have it in named.conf.local
// adding the dlopen ( Bind DLZ ) module for samba, beware, if you using bind9.9 then you need to change this manualy
include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf";
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at
2020 Jul 06
0
dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable
On 7/3/2020 10:01 AM, Robert E. Wooden via samba wrote:
> On 7/3/2020 9:50 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
>> Originally, Samba used /var/lib/samba/private for the dns.keytab and
>> other dns files. This was then found to be possibly insecure, so it
>> was decided to use /var/lib/samba/bind-dns instead. When you upgrade
>> the Samba packages, the old files are not
2020 Jul 10
1
DNS issues on both DC's
I am having dns issues on both DC's.
root at dc1:~# ./samba-setup-checkup.sh
Check hostnames : Ok
./samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 91: [: too many arguments
Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway
Ping gateway ip : 192.168.0.106 : Ok
Warning, no ping to gateway, this might be firewalled.
check you internet connection, subdom DNS might need it.
ping nameserver1:
2019 Jul 16
0
messy replication
Hai Rowland,
Yes, agree here, better correct DC1, then join new.
So i'll post this, its focused on Debian servers, but usable for any other.
I've run the debug on the company AD-DC server here.
A good example for an AD-DC setup with Bind9_DLZ.
And remember, most is on/from wiki.samba.org
Im running this. ( Debian Stretch as AD-DC )
This server started as a wheezy server and is
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland,
Thank you.
I think the 5 zones maybe a parsing issues somewhere. Also, the realms are
in capital, must have been a typo.
The UFW has been disabled and selinux is in a disbaled state
/etc/bind/named.conf.options has
options {
directory "/var/cache/bind";
// If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want
// to talk to, you may need to
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
That the script isnt running, shows that whats going wrong..
Your resolving.. And then thats also why your kerberos settings are not working.
And, that is what your problem is.
Show this:
cat /etc/hosts
cat /etc/resolv.conf
hostname -f
hostname -d
hostname -s
hostname -A
hostname -I
cat /etc/krb5.conf
The bind setup on my Debian (10) Buster AD-DC's with Bind9_dlz
About same setup as
2020 Jul 03
2
dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable
On 7/3/2020 9:50 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> I thought I explained that, but lets try again ;-)
>
> Originally, Samba used /var/lib/samba/private for the dns.keytab and
> other dns files. This was then found to be possibly insecure, so it
> was decided to use /var/lib/samba/bind-dns instead. When you upgrade
> the Samba packages, the old files are not removed, but the
2016 May 18
2
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
So I had dhcp, radvd and bind working together nicely and now I threw in a
wrench of setting up an AD DC
I want to change my dhcp server setting to put client's into the new AD
Domain but am a little hesitant as it is all working so nicely with DDNS
I'm starting to think all I need to do is edit just my dhcpd.conf and
change occurrences of DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD to
2020 Aug 17
1
getent passwd blank response
Hai Bob,
Try this.
First flush cache.
net cache flush
getent passwd username
id username
And run this one again for me:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh
Reply might be bit later on, im running around here.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob
2019 Jul 16
4
messy replication
Hi all,
I'm simply overwhelmed with both the speed and quality of responses.
I wish all mailing lists and forums were like this!
I'm going to follow your suggestions and try to follow the template below.
My choice of new DC will probably be 4.9.5 on buster.
What steps would you recommend to unlink my broken 4.0.9 -> 4.5.16
replication before shutting down 4.5.16?
Is it sufficient
2016 May 27
2
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to
DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able
to write to bind in its zone.
[2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0]
../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done)
../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update -
NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am
2016 May 27
2
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD
helped me find that I needed to add
options {
[...]
tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab";
[...]
};
That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
> On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>
2019 Mar 12
1
classicupgrade, net rpc rights grant NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT and NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR
Am 12.03.2019 um 10:16 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:47:53 +0100
> Christian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 11.03.2019 um 09:24 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 07:16:30 +0100
>>> Christian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
2016 May 27
1
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote:
> On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote:
>
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD
>> helped me find that I needed to add
>>
>> options {
>> [...]
>> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab";
>>
2019 Jan 22
4
Samba BIND9_DLZ autoupdate PTR
Set auth-nxdomain yes;
And stop/start bind9
Other source :
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/
/snap
The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for
Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows
dynamic
2015 Dec 24
2
Centos7 poblems with dnssec-keygen
I am reading:
https://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-bind-rndc.html
I have bind installed and default config running. I have not applied my
customizations yet. The first step I am taking is getting rndc.key
created. So reading the guide I am trying to run (while logged in as
root, and in /etc):
dnssec-keygen -a hmac-md5 -b 256 -n HOST rndc.key
The system is just
2014 Jan 08
1
Samba4 AD DC Domain name question
I've been working on setting up the Sernet 4.1x series samba builds for Centos 6.
Provisioned via sudo /usr/bin/samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 -interactive
With the goal of providing authentication, user and group management with file and print services to Widows 7/8 clients, & authentication user and group management for Linux system users.
The question is around my confusion