similar to: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-mach64 6.8.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Subject: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-r128 6.8.0 To: xorg-announce at lists.freedesktop.org Dave Airlie (9): r128: fix bios size setting for pciaccess George Sapountzis (8): drop radeon, theatre (build system). drop radeon, theatre drop AtomBios and pcidb drop ati wrapper drop mach64 (build system) drop mach64

A boring release, fixing source compatibility with xserver 1.20. Adam Jackson (3): Move max mode h/v checks into ATIValidMode mach64 6.9.6 Alan Coopersmith (2): configure: Drop AM_MAINTAINER_MODE autogen.sh: Honor NOCONFIGURE=1 Emil Velikov (2): autogen.sh: use quoted string variables xf86-video-mach64: remove the GlxSetVisualConfigs stub and friends Mihail

Adam Jackson (3): preinit: Don't bother explicitly loading int10, vbe will do it for us Bump minimum xserver to 1.4 mach64 6.9.5 Alan Coopersmith (2): Remove unused atidecoder.c & atidecoder.h Remove unused atiaudio.c & ATIAudioNames declaration Connor Behan (1): Drop dependence on xf86PciInfo.h Dave Airlie (1): mach64: fix build probably

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0865 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0865.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d96572faafae1eeda3137c7c7b999f66114db3ac82e8ef159ea509cd50b4a72c xorg-x11-drv-mach64-6.9.3-4.1.el6_4.i686.rpm x86_64:

Hello Bob, looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look how it goes. Sincerely AndyBe Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > I am loading a server from the CentOS 6.7 ISO and then upgrading. After loading at release 6.7, the machine behaves normally. After running yum update, the X server will not start. Attempts to

Hello Bob, while im test something with samba, install an old centos 6.4 and updated it. before i move the virual machine into trash, here are the rebuilt driver without any modification. http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/6/ The prelink problem should be gone - hopefully. Sincerely AndyBe Am Mittwoch, den 08.02.2017, 17:40 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > I am loading a server

Styma, Robert (Nokia - US) wrote: >> >>> looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look >>> how it goes. >> I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all >> the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting >> Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is

> Hello Bob, > looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look > how it goes. > Sincerely > AndyBe Hello AndyBe, I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is the same symptom as when it

I am loading a server from the CentOS 6.7 ISO and then upgrading. After loading at release 6.7, the machine behaves normally. After running yum update, the X server will not start. Attempts to start it manually result in one of the following messages depending upon which OS is loaded. I initially loaded it as 64 bit and when that did not work I tried the 32 bit version of the OS. The

Styma, Robert (Nokia - US) wrote: > >> looks like, the driver isn't rebuilt, take the centos 6.8 ISO and look >> how it goes. > I download the ISO's and started the reinstall. It went through all > the normal setup up to outputting the message that it was starting > Anaconda. Then the screen went blank and stayed that way. This is > the same symptom as

So the rebuilt not work? Sincerely Andy Am Mittwoch, den 15.02.2017, 17:26 +0000 schrieb Styma, Robert (Nokia - US): > 1422622

Opened bug Bug 1422622 at RedHat Bugzilla.

> This is a known issue: >https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=58168 >I would recommend filing a bug with Red Hat to have them fix it. I am going to see if I can find someone in the organization with a Red Hat account to open the bug. In the meantime, I came up with a workaround. I wanted to see if I could role the updates back to CentOS 6.7 since the system was 6.7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is pre-release of the ATI driver aimed at 7.3. It doesn't contain randr1.2 support it does however contain a major re-write of the output mappings from what was known as Alex's superpatch. Please logs all regressions into bugzilla so we can fix them before the 6.7 release. Adam Jackson: Undo unintended configure.ac change.

On a fresh installed Illumos/Solaris in a VirtualBox Guest I get the following error after starting up samba 4.10: [2019/04/01 09:51:41.112485, 0] ../../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log) tdb(/var/samba/lock/gencache.tdb): tdb_open_ex: tdb_mutex_init failed for /var/samba/lock/gencache.tdb: Device busy [2019/04/01 09:51:41.141396, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready)

I am newbie in this topic and I have problems trying to bring x.org up on the hardware I have: IBM QS22 BladeServer (PowerPC64 architecture) with PCI-Express connected nVidia 6200 video card. OS: Fedora 10-ppc: Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27.5aik #1 SMP Tue Feb 10 14:55:56 EST 2009 ppc64 ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux I downloaded and compiled DRM driver (git clone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ATI 6.8 pre-release This is the long awaited radeon driver with randr 1.2 support. radeon 6.7 was pretty much a dead end, so it's been branched for those that still want to play with it. In addition to randr support there are quite a few other goodies: zero copy tfp, improved connector table parsing, TV-out support, and much more. Changes since

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:36:08 +0200, daggs wrote: > Greetings Peter, > > > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 at 9:52 AM > > From: "Peter Krempa" <pkrempa@redhat.com> > > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com> > > Cc: "libvirt-usersredhat.com" <libvirt-users@redhat.com> > > Subject: Re: scsi passthrough differs between

------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: redhat-watch-list-request@redhat.com Received: from lists.redhat.com (lists.redhat.com [199.183.24.247]) by sapphire.fnal.gov (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA26469 for <yocum@sapphire.fnal.gov>; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:19:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 7754 invoked by uid 501); 17 Jun 1999 03:06:01 -0000 Resent-Date: 17 Jun 1999 03:06:01 -0000 Resent-Cc: