similar to: Spotlight with Elasticsearch

Hi Louis, I used your excellent packages but also tried building from source. I?m trying to get Tracker working. Elasticsearch was simpler to get going but it doesn?t really suite the use case due to limitations in fscrawler. I actually created the mdssvc user but also tried directly under root once the dedicated user didn?t work. The problem might be somewhere in D-Bus configuration but I

Hello, yes sadly update 8.9 of elasticsearch broke the samba integration. Seems like 8.10 is still broken. Stay on 8.8 until this is fixed. Ive emailed Ralph B?hme of Sernet already, but hes got no time for it atm. Im not sure about the second part of your bug report though: > There is a bug where when the samba server is running and files are being indexed while samba is running finder

I?m trying to setup Spotlight with Tracker (2.3 from Ubuntu repo) backend in Ubuntu 20.04 and Samba 4.12.7. I?ve followed the wiki closely but every time I try to search I get this in the logs: [2020/10/02 10:43:42.078242, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/mdssvc/mdssvc_tracker.c:403(mds_tracker_search_start) mds_tracker_search_start: no connection to Tracker [2020/10/02 10:43:42.079897, 0]

Hi Pertu, On 6/3/24 10:34 AM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: > I see a lot of back and forth network traffic when the results are > displayed, so to me it looks like it could be due to fragmentation, > while the native results seem to come back in a big chunk. iirc I recently added fragmentation support to the mdssvc client, but it's still not implemented in the client. Though

Howdy! Am 10/2/20 um 6:02 PM schrieb Perttu Aaltonen via samba: > I used your excellent packages but also tried building from source. I?m trying to get Tracker working. Elasticsearch was simpler to get going but it doesn?t really suite the use case due to limitations in fscrawler. hm, a customer is using this with good results on laaaaaaarge datasets. I had seen you mentioning problems in an

When comparing to native macOS Spotlight searches, the Samba & elasticsearch combo is much slower, at least for me. Samba takes minutes to return a few hundred results, while native macOS returns thousands of results in a few seconds. This is remotely over a mobile connection, LAN is probably better. Is this due to the missing Spotlight RPC packet fragmentation support mentioned in the

So I have two issues. 1) Using Samba 4.19.2 with spotlight and elasticsearch 8.10.3 doesn?t work. Errors: [2023/10/22 09:04:17, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/mdssvc/mdssvc_es.c:755(mds_es_search_http_read_done) mds_es_search_http_read_done: json_loadb failed 2) Using Samba 4.19.2 with spotlight and elasticsearch 7.17.10 works. There is a bug where when the samba server is running and files

Hi Ralph, Someone has created this: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15379 Looks like the same issue. What?s a good way to fund this? Buy Samba+ and/or support from SerNet, make a donation through samba.org or something else? -Perttu > On 19. Aug 2024, at 16.21, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > ?Interesting. This will likely take a day or two to diagnose

Samba 4.12 release notes <https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.12.0.html> mention "New Spotlight backend for Elasticsearch" and specify some new parameters for smb.conf, but there appear to be zero guides or further instructions for getting this to work. I'm not even clear how filesystem indexing is supposed to work. ElasticSearch appears to be simply a searchable

Hi Noel, As we discussed on the list, I busy getting the bits and pieces in place to be able to test your windows search work. I am running all my stuff on Debian Bullseye, with Samba code in 3 lxc-containers. Two are for the DCs, one is the fileserver. Everything is managed by Ansible code, I try to avoid manual changes to my environment(s) as much as possible. Generally manual changes are

Interesting. This will likely take a day or two to diagnose and fix. Hopefully someone comes around and funds this fix. Can you please file a bugreport to we can track this and more folks become aware of this? -slow On 7/9/24 11:40 AM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I finally found out why I?ve had trouble getting Spotlight searches > working well with the latest

Hey Kees, fs2es-indexer is designed to be a lightweight alternative to FSCrawler. So no ... it doesnt do any content indexing or saves much of the metadata. As far as I understand it the OCR and other stuff makes FScrawler that big. And we dont need any of that - we just want to search for file names. BUT Im open for merge requests ;-) I currently getting away with a lot less complexity

Hi, I finally found out why I?ve had trouble getting Spotlight searches working well with the latest installation I?m working on. It looks like searches won?t work if there are any accented characters in the share name. In this case it is the ? character. Running mount in macOS shows it like this: //user at server.address/Share_with_the_O%CC%88_character on /Volumes/Share_with_the_?_character

Hi Team, Did anybody solve the issue of FScrawler crawling over multiple shares, preferably from a single job or from a single service? Setting up a service for FScrawler per share does not scale very nice... - Kees.

Hi Louis, The idea I had with this thread is to just get an honest comparison between Windows and Samba when it comes to file sharing needs in the Windows world, the missing Windows Search capability was just an example to get the discussion going. If I understand your reference correctly, there is a solution, compatible with Apple's Spotlight, to index files on a Samba server using

Hai Viktor, I dont know or can't tell if this setup can use the windows indexing, i havent looked in to that. I dont use windows indexer. But i do know if you setup as shown and you add a webpage to the server, that makes is also usable for Windows users to search. There was some work done in the area

I noticed during testing a new installation that "elasticsearch:max results? seems to be ignored in Samba 4.19.6. Any limit I set doesn?t stick and I get results over the limit. I tried setting it both in global section and in a share. Leaving it out altogether also results in results over the default limit of 100. Anyone else notice this? I?m running Samba on Debian 12 LXC container.

need to remember to mail from my samba.org address :-) -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Wsearch Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:28:29 +0000 From: Noel Power <nopower at suse.de> To: Kees van Vloten <keesvanvloten at gmail.com>, npower via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Hi Kees On 17/02/2023 10:56, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > Hi Noel, >

Hey guys, I have this log rotation script setup in my /etc/logrotate.d folder /var/log/elasticsearch/*.log { daily rotate 100 size 50M copytruncate compress delaycompress missingok notifempty create 644 elasticsearch elasticsearch } And I notice that log files are still being generated that are upwards of 7 or 8 GBs. Can anyone point out to me where the

> On 23 Oct 2019, at 18.54, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: >> From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed