similar to: Background goo

Hi, I just installed CentOS 7 with GNOME on my new Dell Latitude E6230 laptop. So far, everything runs nicely. I just have one problem with the GNOME lockscreen. I launched the OwnCloud client and started to synchronize about 20 GB of data from my OwnCloud server. During the sync, I left the laptop unattended. After about 15 minutes, the desktop was replaced by the lockscreen, as it should. As

ok, do the following. set ignore systemacl to yes on sysvol and netlogon. login as dom\administrator computer manager, connect to dc. share sysvol, goto share security, reset to defalts. same for folder. goto gpo manager, klik on every gpo object, if one has wrong acl, you get a message to reset it, thats ok. now never samba-tool sysvol reset if you do, you might need to set share/file

Hi list, Today, I spent most of the day figuring out why my password policies set via GPO are not applied on a domain level, just to find out that this is not one of the many occasions where Windows is the problem but it's really Samba, for a change. Apparently, password policies can only be changed using samba-tool and not via GPO. IMO, the FAQ is not very clear here.

GPOs are not synchronized, because I'm going to delete the zentyal domain, how can I delete delete all GPOs from AD y sysvol? and start over [root at srv-cds ~]# samba-tool gpo del {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} GPO {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} is linked to containers ERROR(ldb): Error removing GPO from container - LDAP error 50 LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS - El

Hi Guys, I am trying to connect Windows 10 to Samba domain controller. Windows 10 fails to get GPO’s because it can’t access SysVol with permissions. The domain Windows 10 is going through for SysVol would be \\example.com\SysVol when I navigate to this as Admin it does not let me go with credentials however if I use the servers hostname \\voyager\Sysvol I can access the directory. We have a

On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:03:16 -0400 Robert Marcano via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks for the information, to use a default GPO was a simple way to > try to encourage someone to reproduce the problem. > > I already created new GPOs (this is a test domain) Using the default > filter for a new GPO, "Authenticated users", creating a new group for

Who am I to say this? I am only a lowly user and would-be admin, but it seems to me that one of the most useful features of an AD environment, GPOs, is not fully trust-able under Samba because of instability and ensuing fear, before and after each update, related to sysvol and who knows what. I still love you, though.

I'm having problems with GPO in Samba 4.2.1 I created a GPO to Block Control Panel and applied in my Domain OU. In desktop client I typed "gpupdate /force" and appear a success message that to ask reboot my system. After rebuot the GPO don't work. Other GPOs as WSUS update, Wallpaper and others, don't work too. Following is the result of command: GPRESULT /H

> On 04 Jun 2016, at 22:14, Miguel Medalha <medalist at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> Can someone therefore please explain to me what exactly these GPO >> restrictions are that Samba can't handle? I'd also appreciate if someone >> could list which other GPO I cannot set successfully using RSAT. > > It seems to me that the FAQ is pretty clear. The

Hello, i have a testing environment, 2 DCs Ubuntu 18.04, SAMBA 4.7.4 - MIT Kerberos (clean, not upgraded). I just wan to create/activating a simple GPOs. # Interactive logon: Do not require CTRL + ALT + DEL -> activate # Interactive login: Do not displa last user name -> activate When im activating this Policys (no errors or something like that) nothing happend. I reboot two Domain

Hi, Our Domain controller environment is working for over 6 years without a break. It started with Samba Version 4.6.5 and today running 4.18.5. We have only Windows 10 clients across our organisation. Off late, we have observed that GPOs are not getting updated when we change some GPOs and link them to some specific OUs. For example, previously, we had not allowed one specific network path

What have you joined it to ? zentyal 4.2.11, Samba version 4.3.4-Zentyal El 12/14/2017 a las 11:49 AM, Rowland Penny via samba escribió: > What have you joined it to ?

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 22:40:41 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK - some more detail I have found in the meantime. > > I have compiled & ran listxattr, and I can now see a difference > between a working and a broken file: > > me at dc2:~/download $ > sudo ./listxattr /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ >

On 2/6/2018 1:42 PM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 02/06/2018 01:44 PM, Micha Ballmann via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> i have a testing environment, 2 DCs Ubuntu 18.04, SAMBA 4.7.4 - MIT >> Kerberos (clean, not upgraded). I just wan to create/activating a >> simple GPOs. >> >> # Interactive logon: Do not require CTRL + ALT + DEL -> activate

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:30:03 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Windows, the SYSTEM account is used by services on the local host > (in your case, the local host is your Samba server). For example, > virus scanners might use it to get access to all files. However, > there is nothing on your Samba server that uses the SYSTEM account. >

hai Micha,   The why is explained here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/The_SYSTEM_Account  Which in the end has todo with SID_BOTH, one sid for a user and group, linux does not understand that correctly.   with : acl_xattr:ignore system acls = [yes|no] When set to yes, a best effort mapping from/to the POSIX ACL layer will not be done by this module. The default is no, which means that Samba

On 2/6/2018 2:03 PM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 02/06/2018 02:52 PM, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: >> On 2/6/2018 1:42 PM, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >>> On 02/06/2018 01:44 PM, Micha Ballmann via samba wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> i have a testing environment, 2 DCs Ubuntu 18.04, SAMBA 4.7.4 - MIT >>>> Kerberos

Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn :

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

Hello Marc I already tried the first option the nt 4.0 way, but pointing the script to a network path (UNC path) instead of physical path , is it possible ? Best Regards Dante F.B. Col? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Muehlfeld" <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 2:10:35 PM Subject: Re: