Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "DNS entry missing after join to ad"
2020 Sep 10
1
DNS entry missing after join to ad
I have restart bind and samba multiple times.
I records are missing but i do not what to add them all manually.
On 10.09.20 16:34, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> Looks like you forgot to start bind9 before you started samba..
> After the join..
>
>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
>> basti
2020 Sep 11
3
dnsvi and bind_dlz
Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz?
When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH
2017 Nov 08
2
Samba 4.7 DC with BIND9_DLZ and MIT Kerberos fails at DNS Update
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:04:09 CET Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Am 07.11.2017 um 18:35 schrieb Johannes Engel via samba:
> > a month ago I have filed bug #13066 about Samba 4.7 DC using BIND9_DLZ
> > as DNS backend failing to run samba_dnsupdate using MIT Kerberos. The
> > logs show a kerberos error "Request is a replay". Logs attached here:
2019 Sep 03
3
Trouble joining DC Bind9_DLZ
On 03/09/2019 10:07, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Samba 4.10.7 with Bind9_DLZ (9.10.3-P4-Debian), but I'm not
> getting to insert a new DC into the Domain. My SO is a VM Debian 9.9.
>
> Following is the command used and the error:
>
> root at samba4-dc3:/var/lib/samba/private# samba-tool domain join
> empresa.com.br DC -k yes
2017 Nov 07
2
Samba 4.7 DC with BIND9_DLZ and MIT Kerberos fails at DNS Update
Dear all,
a month ago I have filed bug #13066 about Samba 4.7 DC using BIND9_DLZ
as DNS backend failing to run samba_dnsupdate using MIT Kerberos. The
logs show a kerberos error "Request is a replay". Logs attached here:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13066.
Since I have not received any feedback on the bug report, I am trying
this channel if someone has any idea how to fix
2016 Sep 23
3
dnsupdate_nameupdate_done - Failed DNS update
Thank you Denis and Rowland - I didn't realise this was the script, makes
sense now.
I've run it (on dc2) and it gets as far as:
need update: SRV _ldap._tcp.mysite._sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.org.uk
dc2.mydomain.org.uk 389
[lots of updates needed]
10 DNS updates and 0 DNS deletes needed
Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc1.mydomain.org.uk as DC2$
and then it fails here:
2017 Dec 18
5
DHCP-DNS problems
On 18 December 2017 at 16:20, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
>
>
> Even this looks wrong, I would expect something like this:
>
> Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.0.111 from
> cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3 via eth0
> Dec 18 07:43:59 dc3 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 192.168.0.111 to cc:4e:ec:e9:c8:d3
> via eth0
> Dec 18 07:47:33 dc3 dhcpd:
2018 Dec 12
1
[Solved] GSSAPI/Kerberos authenticate with Dovecot
OK, for now it seem to work.
Server: dovecot.my.fqdn.com
Security: STARTTLS
Auth: Kerberos/GSSAPI
Possible Problems:
- Keytabfile (samba-tool delegation show dovecot\$) ?
- IP as Servername
- SSL/TLS Port 993 ?
Maybe someone can complete the wiki with thunderbird settings?
P.S.
Roland kinit -V5 DOVECOTUSER at MY.FQDN.COM did also work
I use the samba wiki, dont know why only export 3
2016 Sep 23
5
dnsupdate_nameupdate_done - Failed DNS update
Hi,
All 3 of my DCs regularly display an error in syslog almost exactly every
10 minutes. They have been doing this for quite some time, and I have so
far ignored the message as everything else DNS-wise seemed to mostly be
working - but I figured it was worth getting to the bottom of it if I can.
So this isn't new at all but rather something that has been present for
some time.
I am using
2018 Aug 21
3
Samba 4.8.4 + BIND 9.9.4 - possibility of nonsecure DNS updates
> So you never read this:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC
> Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named
> 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D
If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made
2020 Sep 11
1
dnsvi and bind_dlz
we have our own dnsvi based on nsupdate. i have problems with dns names,
that are exists on dc2 but not on dc1.
its faster then alwasy use a windows gui :-D
On 11.09.20 10:06, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 11/09/2020 08:31, basti via samba wrote:
>> Hello is there a way to use dnsvi with samba bind_dlz?
>> When i use this i get error update failed: NOTAUTH
>>
> I
2017 Apr 12
2
BIND DNS Reverse Update
there is the same problem.
My setup is as follow:
router (DHCP/Bind as forwarder dc1 and dc2)
/etc/dhcpd.conf
option domain-name-servers 192.168.30.2, 192.168.30.6;
dc1 (192.168.30.2) / dc2 (192.168.30.6) are domain Controller with
bind_dlz DNS, dc2 is update via axfr
dc1 ist dns master and where I see the errors.
client 192.168.30.175#55454: update 'samdom.example.com/IN' denied
2017 Dec 18
2
DHCP-DNS problems
Hello there.
So, I have a Samba AD setup, with DHCP and samba_dlz setup as described in
the wiki.
However, I find that after a while, dynamic DHCPD updates stop working.
The fix is for me to restart the named server.
When in this state, I get log messages like:
DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.52.232 (192.168.60.2) from 8c:be:be:0d:cf:3c
(RedmiNote4-Gj?gur) via 192.168.52.253
Dec 18 15:39:44 dc02
2019 Jun 26
4
One DC cannot authenticate off of another DC
Thank you, Louis, for your reply.
By simply asking me to provide outputs of the aforementioned files, I found the cause of my first problem (auth failing). It was my /etc/hosts file on dc1.
All of them should look like this, and indeed DC2 and DC3's *did* look like this:
# cat /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1 ? ? ? localhost.samdom.mycompany.net ?localhost
> 192.168.3.201
2017 Apr 12
2
BIND DNS Reverse Update
OK I have done and ad an reverse zone to my ad.
manual added values are found now.
Automatic updates (by client like ipconfig /renew) are still denied.
Am 12.04.2017 um 13:28 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:12:42 +0200
> basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> In named.conf.local I have a reverse zone
>>
>> zone
2020 Sep 11
4
Problems with sysrepl
> I think all is clean fine.
You "think"..?? .. You must verify this !
Asumption is the mother of all fuckups an old boss of me always said..
And he is right.
Run : samba-tool fsmo show
And verify both servers.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record#The_objectGUID_CNAME_Record
And go through :
2024 Jan 04
1
{Device Timeout} The I/O operation specified in %hs was not completed before the timeout period expired
Hi Rowland,
Could you tell me what the correct permissions are for the bind9 files?
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:46?PM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote:
> The only 'problem' I can see is that the group is set to 'bind' instead
>> of 'root', why is this ?
>
> If I'm not mistaken, I did it on the wiki, but maybe I needed an older
>
2018 Jun 06
4
Recurrent DNS issues after DC loss
On 06.06.2018 16:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> It doesn't say that any more ;-)
>
> This is from my DCs
>
> root at dc4:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search samdom.example.com
> nameserver 192.168.0.6
> root at dc4:~# hostname -i
> 192.168.0.6
>
> root at dc3:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search samdom.example.com
> nameserver 192.168.0.7
> root at
2020 Jun 01
2
several dns issues after switching fsmo roles to samba-dc
Hello,
I've finally decided to switch all FSMO roles from Windows 2008 R2 DC (vm-dc1)
to one of the two Samba 4.12.3 DCs (vm-dc3). Here are several issues I've faced
after that:
1. After connecting DNS Manager to the all DCs, I've found that the SOA record
for my domain and msdcs zones still point to the former PDC - vm-dc1.
Is that OK?
2. So, I've changed the SOA manually
2019 Jun 25
2
One DC cannot authenticate off of another DC
Hello Samba Friends,
I have a single DC (we'll call it, "DC1") that simply will not take my password when I run this command:?
#samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc2 ldap://dc3 -Uadministrator?
Or this command:?
#samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc1 ldap://dc2 -Uadministrator?
I basically get this:?
> Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:?
> Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:?