similar to: samba-tool userou strings??

When creating a new user, that new user is placed into "ou=Users" by default. I would like to create a new user and place him/her in: samdom.example.com | >> COMPANY | >> Workstations | >> RedirectedUsers (Trying to illustrate an "ou" tree of depth.) I looked at samba-tool ou but, I am not moving an "ou" or renaming an "ou". I'm

Yes, thank you for the guidance. Regarding "*You do not put the users password here (if that is what you are trying to do): --password=PASSWORD1*" My experience has been this, no matter where I put "--password=" in the string, after the "user" as the manpage suggests or the end. When I run the create string I am asked for a "New Password:' and then

All is going well with samba-tool create [user] except for userou=USEROU. In ADUC. My domain users ou are "down in the tree" further than the default OU (used in samba-tool create [user] command.) Like so: ad.example.com (domain name) |>> Users (default location "user create" puts entry) |>> CompanyName |>>

I'm working on a shell script to create new users on a AD DC. Currently we use ADUC, but that is slow and error-prone. My (untested) command looks like this: samba-tool user create $USERNAME $PASSWORD \ --nis-domain=sta \ --unix-home=/home/${USERNAME} \ --uid-number=${NEXTID} \ --login-shell=/sbin/nologin \ --gid-number=513 \ --use-username-as-cn \ --home-drive=Z \

On 11/10/2020 13:59, Robert Wooden wrote: > Yes, thank you for the guidance. > > Regarding "/You do not put the users password here (if that is what > you are trying to do): --password=PASSWORD1/" > > My experience has been this, no matter where I put "--password=" in > the string, after the "user" as the manpage suggests or the end. When >

I've been working on setting up the Sernet 4.1x series samba builds for Centos 6. Provisioned via sudo /usr/bin/samba-tool domain provision --use-rfc2307 -interactive With the goal of providing authentication, user and group management with file and print services to Widows 7/8 clients, & authentication user and group management for Linux system users. The question is around my confusion

Hi, I tried samba 4.12.0 on our file server which is a domain member and exporting some shares. We're getting some strange errors on some shares since the update. Right after starting or restarting smbd everything is fine. After short while (seconds or a few minutes) users are getting errors when trying to access the shares, e.q. "Invalid Handle Error", "An unexpected

I am having dns issues on both DC's. root at dc1:~# ./samba-setup-checkup.sh Check hostnames : Ok ./samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 91: [: too many arguments Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway Ping gateway ip : 192.168.0.106 : Ok Warning, no ping to gateway, this might be firewalled. check you internet connection, subdom DNS might need it. ping nameserver1:

Hi, I have two member server and both with Samba 4.6.7. I'm using winbind for NSS and PAM. One of the member server is exporting an NFS4 mount which the other member server is mounting. For users with an rid-mapped uid below some value everything works fine. If the uid is above this value the group permissions are not evaluated and I'm getting a permission denied if a folder or file is

Yesterday I had an issue with Samba v 4.13.0. Went to backup and discovered backup computer has a drive failure and backup is gone. Only resort is to rebuild the DC. I cannot figure out why bind9 will not "host -t SRV _ldap._ tcp.ad.dtntwk.work." or "host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.ad.dtntwk.work." root at dc1:~# host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.subdom.example.com. >

Hi Am 09.03.20 um 16:32 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 09/03/2020 14:25, Andreas Hauffe via samba wrote: >> [global] >> ??????? dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab >> ??????? kerberos method = secrets and keytab > Why the dedicated keytab ? We have a kerberized NFS4 running on that machine, too. > >> workgroup = ILRW >> ??????? idmap config dom :

I am trying to add a (CentOS4.4) Samba-3.0.23d server to a AD Win2K3 domain and the following error occurs # /usr/kerberos/bin/kinit administrator@SUBDOM.DOMAIN # net join Using short domain name -- SUBDOM Failed to set servicePrincipalNames. Please ensure that the DNS domain of this server matches the AD domain, Or rejoin with using Domain Admin credentials. Disabled account for

I have been working on creating users with samba-tool create. samba-tool user create tuser70 --surname="Test" --given-name="User" --initials=70 --uid-number=10070 --gid -number=10000 --description='70 user' --gecos='Test 70. User' --uid='Test 70. User' --login-shell=/bin/sh --unix-home=/h ome/SAMDOM/tuser70

Thanks, I will give that a try. But I need the 'winbind separator = +'. We use some expensive commercial software (e.g. ANSYS, ABAQUS, ...), which uses shell scripts to start their software under linux. These scripts are not able to handle a backslash in the user name. The only solution was to switch to a "+" character. We reported these issues two years ago. Regards,

On 8/17/20 4:36 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 17/08/2020 10:20, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >> >> But have you tried this : >> getent passwd "SAMDOM\username" > > Unless you have in smb.conf (which are not recommended): > > winbind enum users = yes > > winbind enum groups = yes > > Running 'getent passwd' and

Hai Bob, Try this. First flush cache. net cache flush getent passwd username id username And run this one again for me: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Reply might be bit later on, im running around here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob

Dear list, After (almost) successfully removing a dead DC from my domain I am left with only one visible symptom: samba-tool drs showrepl shows two stale outbound link for one of the remaining 2 DCs: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=subdom,DC=mydom,DC=com NTDS DN: CN=NTDS

If I run Louis' "samba-check-db-repl.sh" script and it does not send an email then this is a "no news is good news" situation, I am assuming. DC1 sends no email. DC2 sends this: ERROR: Compare failed: -1 * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... * Objects to be compared: 287 * Result for [DOMAIN]: SUCCESS * Comparing [CONFIGURATION] context... * Objects to be compared: 1619 *

Hi James, thanks a lot for your hint. However, I seem to be unable to find it there. Can you please be a little more specific? I tried to check the replication topology, but no success. Thanks a lot! Best regards Johannes lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schrieb am Mo., 26. Juni 2017 um 20:52 Uhr: > On 6/26/2017 2:43 PM, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > > Dear

Hai eveyone.   I know about the dns "things" in the past. DNS Islanding problems etc. This one is a bit hijacking the subject : “Horrible BIND9_DLZ DNS breakage after DC replaced and samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server”     I would like to suggest a smale change in how we suggest to setup samba ADDC dns things, and i do think this help in the setup of the AD