similar to: Need help in Samba4.1 mount

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

Hi, I bet this question was asked several times, but I'm honestly not able to find a solution. My samba4.1 (running on FreeBSD10) is part of a larger network/AD where I only have very restricted rights. Our network consists of a "toplevel" AD-Domain (top.foo.bar) and several "subdomains" (in my case: sub1.top.foo.bar), which have their own domaincontrollers (MS Windows

Hi, I would like to accelerate CURD operation of LDAP. Please let me know a tuning setup of OS or Samba. Although I am performing shift verification to Samba 4.1.12 from OpenLDAP 2.3, the CURD operation using a LDAP interface becomes 1/10 or less speed compared with OpenLDAP. Although this OpenLDAP is performing an optimized tuning setup, Samba is in the default state immediately after carrying

OK, further to my previous message I've configured BIND, but when I try to run samba_dnsupdate I get the following: Nov 18 16:19:23 sles-shire named[6112]: samba b9_putrr: unhandled record type 0 Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone _msdcs.main.adlab.netdirect.ca Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of

Hi all, I'm in the process of setting up a test network with the view of rebuilding our existing (Samba 3.5-based) NT domain, from scratch. Most of the clients that will be connecting to it are Windows 7 machines, there is one Windows 8.1 Standard machine (that won't be joining, but not my problem), and a number of Windows XP virtual machines. Presently I'm running a network

Dear all, For an ordinary ridge regression problem, I followed three different approaches: 1. estimate beta without any standardization 2. estimate standardized beta (standardizing X and y) and then again convert back 3. estimate beta using lm.ridge() function X<-matrix(c(1,2,9,3,2,4,7,2,3,5,9,1),4,3) y<-as.matrix(c(2,3,4,5)) n<-nrow(X) p<-ncol(X) #Without standardization

Hi All, I have a recvfile patch for samba4.1. This patch is working with linux client, But if am trying this with windows client am getting following error in my server. " Unexpected RPC Fragment size! (0)" In client side am getting "Remote procedure call failed and did not execute" And the samba share not mounted. So far i tried regedit with Lanman workstation

I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need to install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not available in EPEL as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is because it is already available in a supplementary channel from RHEL for C 6. Is this the recommended method for installing it on C 6?

On 29.01.2023 19:08, Rob Campbell via samba wrote: > This was my reference > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Operating_System_Requirements > > I need to rebuild my system due to package corruptions and unintentionally > "upgrading" to sid from bullseye, I figured I'd take this time to do things > right. Although this is only for home personal use, everyone keeps

Dear Samba team In my lab: Windows XP/7/8 joined Samba4.1 AD DC OK! I don't change any password policy (all are default!) But when users logged on sucessfully, they *pressed ctrl + alt + del* in order to change their passwords (new password included over 8 characters, complexity...), but they failed I also read this link: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-September/158171.html

Hi All, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements.Following is the comparison result samba 3.6.8 + samba4.1.3. Following number is robocopy 2 flow result. 3.6.8 Read/Write (speed MB/sec) : 210/*202* 4.1 Read/Write: (speed MB/sec) : 220/*192* In case of read am getting better throughput for samba 4.1 but write always less. How can i improve the write throughput? Am not

Recently, i scanned my samba4.1 server by Nessus (a vulnerability scanner tool - http://www.tenable.com/products/nessus) Nessus says that Samba4 is vulnerable to "LDAP NULL BASE Search Access" as "The remote LDAP server may disclose sensitive information." Further it says that - The remote LDAP server supports search requests with a null, or empty, base object. This allows

On 11/25/2017 10:52 PM, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Saturday, November 25, 2017 18:55:18 +0100 >> From: H <agents at meddatainc.com> >> >> I have chromium installed on CentOS 7 and it works fine, I now need >> to install it on a CentOS 6 workstation. However, it is not >> available in EPEL as it is for C 7. From what I understand, this is >> because

This was my reference https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Operating_System_Requirements I need to rebuild my system due to package corruptions and unintentionally "upgrading" to sid from bullseye, I figured I'd take this time to do things right. Although this is only for home personal use, everyone keeps saying that I shouldn't run my file server on my DC so I want to build a

HI all, I set up a PXE server by following the following howto ( http://www.tecmint.com/install-pxe-network-boot-server-in-centos-7/ ) is working but I noticed him running I need the CD in one repository http or nfs. because it is necessary to have everything in ISO image? it is possible to boot an ISO by the network as I do with the CD or DVD? Regards.

Latest chromium-el6 at http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ is chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx wondering if there are any problems building version 29?

Hi, I recently discovered Markdown, and I'm currently using it to write some documentation for CentOS 7. https://github.com/kikinovak/formation-linux For the time being, I'm using my good old Vim editor for writing it. I turned off syntax highlighting, since this produces random results with Markdown. Pages are correctly displayed on Github, but in order to see them, I have to push

again, some fairly trivial(?) questions about working with centos 7.4, given my time immersed in fedora so i want to make sure i'm not carrying over any bad habits. first, is there anything untoward in updating an installed version of centos 7.4 with a simple "yum update"? i'm well aware of keeping in mind the goal of stability with centos, so am unsure what the philosophy is

Hi, Some time ago one of my public servers (running Slackware64 14.0) got attacked and was misused to send phishing emails. This misadventure made me more concerned about security, so I spent the last few weeks catching up on security, reading docs about SELinux and how to use it, etc. I have a public sandbox server running CentOS 7, and I'm currently experimenting quite a lot with Apache

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/17/2016 9:18 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> vlc.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el6 @rpmfusion-free-updates > > rpmfusion is comatose, that VLC rpm hasn't been updated in a couple years. Does that imply that I should abandon VLC or just rpmfusion? This site: