similar to: Win10 and NT mode: netlogon script seems does not run anymore.

On 13/04/16 21:32, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello, > > Am 13.04.2016 um 13:20 schrieb lejeczek: >> I have a win10 which is (from what I see) a good member of samba domain >> except for one thing - it does not seem to a few simply things from a >> logon.bat, or does not do anything with it. >> would you share your thoughts? > We can't, if you don't share

Hi, in a small office an old server is running Samba 3.2.15 on Debian Lenny. It is used for domain authentication and file sharing, and all Windows clients - currently up to Windows 7 - work perfectly fine with that. Now my question, to which I cannot easily find an answer on Google, is: if a client is upgraded to Windows 10, will it still work with that old Samba version? A server upgrade is

Hai, Thanks for that link, that is very usefull. Only after reading it i see its missing a very important part. This opens a security leak. See link ( dated in : Last Updated: Apr 15, 2015 ) https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3000483/ms15-011-vulnerability-in-group-policy-could-allow-remote-code-executi The examples shown there. \\<Server>\<Share> - Needs to be

Hello We have a problem with our Windows 10 Clients. Installed on a SLES12 Server is samba v4.4 I can bind the clients to the domain without any problem. Afterwards I want to login in the domain, I get the error, no logonserver available I can change in the smb conf max protocol to NT1 -> now it is possible to login with user xxx in the domain We don't want to use our samba server

Upgrading Win7-32 (connected to Samba as NT-PDC) to Win10 requires - disable HardenedUncPaths (MutualAuth & Integrity) - install NTVDM - enable LegacyConsole otherwise the logon-script in Netlogon does not run, even if samba.cnf contains "server max level = NT1" Is Samba as NT-PDC supposed to handle HardenedUncPaths? Did I miss that I should have enabled that somehow in smb.conf?

Hi Guys, I am trying to connect Windows 10 to Samba domain controller. Windows 10 fails to get GPO’s because it can’t access SysVol with permissions. The domain Windows 10 is going through for SysVol would be \\example.com\SysVol when I navigate to this as Admin it does not let me go with credentials however if I use the servers hostname \\voyager\Sysvol I can access the directory. We have a

I've been running Samba 4 in NT4 Domain mode for a few years, and it's been working fine with Windows 7 PCs. I now need to join a new Windows 10 PC to the domain, but I'm not having any success! When I try to join the domain, the Windows 10 PC says "An Active Directory Domain Controller could not be contacted...." I've tried a few things, including:- Setting

any messages in the windows 10 event logs, that could give some extra insight. according to https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/7f5207cc-b202-47fc-bbb8-9ebe46a31961/network-logon-script-failure?forum=WinPreview2014General >\\foo.lan\netlogon should work. but, https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 has some good info about the latest patch about hardening GPO. (which imo wil be

Am 14.04.2016 um 11:33 schrieb lejeczek: > I'm guessing I'm missing some specifics needed for win10 - what are > those I wonder. Is your Samba a NT4-style PDC? You are using Samba 3, I'm using Samba 4. Anyway: In my experiments I also had to set an additional regpatch for Win10 and a Samba 4.3.x NT4-style domain for logon scripts - otherwise the logon scripts are not

The issue does not seem to be connected to SMB1. It can be installed and it still won't authenticate. Something has been changed to force authentication to AD/DNS either solely or as a first step. The translation of the netbios name never happens even if the computer can resolve the name. Given that the authentication thru netbios resolution seems to get grandfathered in provided the domain

Hi list, I've a strange issue with Windows 7 (also occurs on 8.1) when accessing shares on domain controllers. If I use IP address or in-domain FQDN (server.domain.name), all is right. If I use another DNS entry pointing to the same IP, share access fails with following message (translated from french) : \\somehost.somsuffix\someshare is not accessible. […] Invalid parameter Issue

I just joined a Windows 10 (build 10130) to our Samba 3 domain. It seems to work. I can login, a home directory is created on the server, and I can access shares. All shares are OK, except "netlogon". Logon scripts don't run, and I cannot open the netlogon share. I get "Access denied" and a prompt to enter my username and password, which keeps coming back. At the

On 27/08/2020 08:49, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3181029/smb-file-server-share-access-is-unsuccessful-through-dns-cname-alias > @Rowland have a good look at this one. This one is hitting the list.. (i have seen this problem also). I think everyone knows my views on NT4-style domains, they were a good idea at the time, but that time is most

Since past the beta-times of samba 4 (and it worked in former times!!) it never worked like this: \\yourdomain\share or \\yourdomain \dfs-share. The only thing working along witch your domain is: \\yourdomain\netlogon. I had another thread open on this case some times ago. Greetings Daniel EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen

try these settings for your GPO. Solution: GPEDIT.MSC -> Computer -> Administrative templates -> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths Added \\foo.lan\netlogon and Value: RequireMutualAuthentication=0,RequireIntegrity=0,RequirePrivacy=0 add \\foo\netlogon also Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Make sure you use the new GPO policies. Looks like the problem "[Samba] Windows 10 in Samba 3 domain: netlogon share access denied" Its not only for windows 10, also 7 and 8.x Solution: GPEDIT.MSC -> Computer -> Administrative templates -> Network -> Networkprovider -> Hardened UNC Paths Added \\foo.lan\netlogon and Value:

Yes, you correct, you wasted time on this.. Read also, this will give more insight. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4034314/smbv1-is-not-installed-by-default-in-windows Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 mei 2018 19:12 > Aan: samba

Hi everyone, I have two domains with a two way trust (DomA and DomB). When users from DomA (on a DomB Linux PC) access sysvol on DomB's DC using smbclient everything works: # smbclient //DomB /sysvol -Udoma\\user -c 'ls' -k . D 0 Thu Jan 9 13:53:03 2020 .. D 0 Thu Jan 9 14:28:29 2020 domb

He.. im working also... ;-)   3 phone calls.. main boss in my office mous died... , answering you e-mail and installing windows pc. Working on support tickets... pff.. to much... at once..   And you cant access the server on DC3 at all with   \\dc3.domain.tld\sysvol   Or only \\dc3.domain.tld   Then check you share rights.   And/or apply ( but should not be needed if you use

The way we patch the Windows registry in order to allow it to boot off a virtio-blk drive was initially conceived by comparing the state with virtio-blk driver properly installed, to that without. However, we don't want to replicate the Windows PnP system; rather we need to apply just enough edits to make the system boot, and then let the Windows PnP manager figure out the rest. This series